TY - JOUR AU - Ochotny, Piotr PY - 2017/09/30 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - A presumed consent in a transplantology context JF - Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae JA - seb VL - 15 IS - 3 SE - Articles DO - 10.21697/seb.2017.15.3.03 UR - https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/seb/article/view/6229 SP - 29-35 AB - <p>The author, in his paper, pays close attention to presumed consent and wider a right to self-determination, which is meant as an act of decision in a transplantology context. Polish legislation of transplantation from 2005 in article 4 lists four reasons for transplantation of organs: post-mortem autopsy, therapeutic, academic, and didactic. Simultaneously, article 5 states that transplantation of organs for a therapeutic reason is possible when the deceased person distinctly hadn’t disagreed with such an action. If there are no clear objections against transplantation, and the deceased person does not carry a note of which could suggest otherwise, the physician can legally assume that the person had agreed to an organ sampling (from presumed consent). The phrase “for a therapeutic reason” evidently points out that a donor’s disagreement is only valid in a face of organ, tissue, and cell harvest for a medicinal cause. However, organs sampling: post-mortem autopsy, which is both academic and didactic, does not fall under the same regulations, as it will be conducted regardless of the presence or lack of permit of family or the will statement of the deceased one. On the other side, every organ sampling for academic and didactic reasons requires a separate declaration from a donor as lack of their disagreement is not sufficient in this case. To resolve this forensic-legal deadlock, it is suggested to extend a presumed consent of organs sampling.</p> ER -