The state’s attitude towards religious communities in a health crisis: pursuing toward new interpretative approaches?

Adelaide Madera

doi:10.21697/CSP.2022.26.1.13

Opublikowane: 2022-12-28

Nr 26 (2022)

The state’s attitude towards religious communities in a health crisis: pursuing toward new interpretative approaches?

Adelaide Madera

Chrześcijaństwo-Świat-Polityka

Dział: Miscellanea

https://doi.org/10.21697/CSP.2022.26.1.13

Abstrakt

Jako swego rodzaju przełom wybuch COVID-19 w 2020 r. głęboko zmienił nasze zwykłe wyobrażenie o życiu społecznym. Taki bezprecedensowy stan zagrożenia zdrowia stanowi również poważne wyzwanie w zakresie podstawowych praw i wolności, będąc testem radzenia sobie w skrajnych warunkach dla nowoczesnych konstytucyjnych systemów pluralistycznych. Ożywił obawy dotyczące „wyjątkowej” roli religii w postsekularnych społeczeństwach demokratycznych, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem wolności religijnej. Celem tego artykułu jest zbadanie, poprzez analizę porównawczą, implikacji ery pandemii jako okazji do refleksji nad potrzebą ponownego przyjrzenia się roli organizacji religijnych w ramach sieci aktorów społecznych. Artykuł pokazuje, że współpraca między aktorami politycznymi i wspólnotami wyznaniowymi może przyczynić się do wdrożenia nowych sposobów wspólnego życia, w których wszyscy aktorzy społeczni promują wspólne zaangażowanie na rzecz wspólnych celów z myślą o budowaniu bardziej zrównoważonej przyszłości.

Słowa kluczowe:

stan zagrożenia zdrowia, środki ograniczające, wspólnoty religijne, współpraca

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Madera, A. (2022). The state’s attitude towards religious communities in a health crisis: pursuing toward new interpretative approaches?. Chrześcijaństwo-Świat-Polityka, (26), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.21697/CSP.2022.26.1.13

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Artaud de la Ferrière (2020), Religion et séculasarisme au temps du coronavirus, PUG, Fontaine.
Google Scholar

Ahmad N. (2021) Protecting the rights of minorities under international law and implications of COVID-19: An overview of the Indian context, “Laws”, vol. 10, no. 17.
Google Scholar

Balsamo F., and Tarantino D. (eds.) (2020). Law, Religion and the Spread of COVID-19 Pandemic. Diresom Papers 2, Diresom, Pisa, https://diresom.net/2020/11/07/law-religion-and-the-spread-of-covid-19-pandemic-ebook-diresom-papers-2/, ( 05.05. 2021).
Google Scholar

Bean T.J. and Fretwell Wilson R. (2020), The Administrative State as a New Front in the Culture War: Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania, “Cato Supreme Court Review”, no. 20-24.
Google Scholar

Blackman J. (2021), The “Essential Free Exercise, “Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy”, vol. 4.
Google Scholar

Calabresi G., Bobbit P. (1978), Tragic Choices. The Conflicts Society Confronts in the Allocation of Tragically Scarce Resources, W.W. Norton & Co., New York.
Google Scholar

Castelli L. (2021), Alla ricerca del “limite dei limiti”: il “contenuto essenziale” dei diritti fondamentali nel dialogo fra le corti, “Rivista AIC”, no. 1.
Google Scholar

Casuscelli G. (2021), Gli “effetti secondari” (ma non troppo) della pandemia sul diritto ecclesiastico italiano e le sue fonti, “Stato, Chiese E Pluralismo Confessionale”, no. 8.
Google Scholar

Chopko M. (2021), The Constitutionality of Providing Public Fund for U.S. Houses of Worship during the Coronavirus, “Laws”, vol. 10, no. 8.
Google Scholar

Christians L.-L. and Overbeeke A. (2021), El derecho belga sobre los groupos religiosos frente el desafío de la crisis sanitaria del COVID-19. Normativa de crisis entre viejos reflejos y nuevas realidades, in: Martínez-Torrón J, and Rodrigo Lara B. (eds.), Iustel, Madrid.
Google Scholar

Colaianni N. (2020), La libertà di culto al tempo del coronavirus, “Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo e Confessionale”, no. 7.
Google Scholar

Consorti P. (2021), Emergencia y libertad religiosa en Italia frente al medio a la COVID-19, in: Martínez-Torrón J, and Rodrigo Lara B. (eds.), Iustel, Madrid.
Google Scholar

Corbin C.M. (2020), Religious Liberty in a Pandemic, “Duke L.J. Online”, vol. 70.
Google Scholar

Durham,W.C. Jr. (2020). The Coronavirus, the Compelling State Interest in Autonomy, and Religious Autonomy, “Canopy Forum” 2 October 2020 “Law, Religion, and Coronavirus in the Unites States: A Six Month Assessment”, https://canopyforum.org/2020/10/02/the-coronavirus-the-compelling-state-interest-in-health-and-religious-autonomy(05.05 2021).
Google Scholar

Fornerod A. (2021), Freedom of Worship during a Public Health State of Emergency in France, “Laws”, vol. 10, no. 15.
Google Scholar

Haynes J. (2021), Donald Trump, the Christian Right and COVID-19: The Politics of Religious Freedom, “Laws”, vol. 10, no. 6.
Google Scholar

Haynes J. (2021), Trump and the Politics of International Religious Freedom, “Religions”, vol. 11.
Google Scholar

Herbert D. (2016), Religion and Civil Society. Rethinking Public Religion in the Contemporary World, Routledge, London and New York.
Google Scholar

Hill M. (2020), Coronavirus and the Curtailment of Religious Liberty, “Laws”, vol. 9, no. 27.
Google Scholar

Hirschl R. (2004), Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Holden C. (ed.) (2021), A Guide for Dealing with COVID-19, Vienna Kaiicid.
Google Scholar

Lazzaro A. (2021), Ragionevolezza vs. precauzione nei conflitti tra interessi nel periodo pandemico: diritto alla salute e diritto all’istruzione, in : Ingratoci C., Madera A., Pellegrino F. (eds.), I diritti fondamentali al tempo della pandemia da COVID-19, ESI, Napoli.
Google Scholar

Licastro A. (2021), La libertà di culto e la lezione della pandemia, in : Ingratoci C., Madera A., Pellegrino F. (eds.), I diritti fondamentali al tempo della pandemia da COVID-19, ESI, Napoli.
Google Scholar

Lo Giacco M.L. (2020), I Protocolli per la ripresa delle celebrazioni delle confessioni diverse dalla cattolica: una nuova stagione nella politica ecclesiastica italiana, “ Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale”, no. 12.
Google Scholar

Lo Giudice A. (2021), La tentazione tirannica dei valori assoluti, in: Ingratoci C., Madera A., Pellegrino F. (eds.), I diritti fondamentali al tempo della pandemia da COVID-19, ESI, Napoli.
Google Scholar

Madera A. (2020), Some Preliminary Remarks on the Impact of COVID-19 on the Exercise of Religious Freedom in the United States and Italy, “Stato, Chiese e Pluralismo Confessionale”, no. 16.
Google Scholar

Madera A. (2021), The Implications of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Religious Exercise: Preliminary Remarks, “Laws”, vol. 10, no. 44.
Google Scholar

Martínes-Torrón J. (2021a), COVID-19 and Religious Freedom: Some Comparative Perspectives, “Laws”, vol. 10(2) no. 39.
Google Scholar

Martínes-Torrón J. (2021b), COVID-19 y libertad religiosa: ¿problemas nuevos o soluciones antiguas?, in Martínes-Torrón J. and Rodrigo Lara B., COVID-19 y libertad religiosa, Iustel, Madrid.
Google Scholar

Melillo S., Fountain D., Bormet M., and O’Brien C. (2021), Effects of Faith Actor Engagement in the Uptake and Coverage of Immunization in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries, https://usaidmomentum.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Faith-Engagement-in-Immunization_Global-Landscape-Analysis_Evidence-Summary-Report_June-2021_Sec508comp-low.pdf 17.11.2022.
Google Scholar

Mosquera Monelos S. ( 2021), The Impact of the Church-State Model for an Effective Guarantee of Religious Freedom. A Study from the Peruvian Experience during the COVID-19 Pandemic, “Laws”, vol. 10, no. 40.
Google Scholar

Neves-Silva, P. Giselle Isabele Martins G., and Léo Heller L. (2019), Human rights’ interdependence and indivisibility: a glance over the human rights to water and sanitation, “International Health and Human Rights”, vol. 19.
Google Scholar

Petrov J. (2020), The COVID-19 emergency in the age of executive aggrandizement: What role for legislative and judicial checks?, “Theory and Practice of Legislation”, vol. 8.
Google Scholar

Schwartzman M. (2012), What if Religion isn’t special?, “U. Chi. L. Rev.”, vol. 79.
Google Scholar

Ruggeri A. (2020), Il coronavirus, la sofferta tenuta dell’assetto istituzionale e la crisi palese, ormai endemica, del sistema delle fonti, “Consulta on line”, no. 1.
Google Scholar

Ysseldyk R., Matheson K, and Anisman H. (2010), Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective, “Personality and Social Psychology Review”, vol. 14, no. 1.
Google Scholar

Yendell A., Hidalgo O., Hillenbrand C. (2021), The Role of Religious Actors in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Theory-Based Empirical Analysis with Policy Recommendations for Action, Edition Kultur und Außenpolitik, Stuttgart.
Google Scholar

Wijesinghe M.S.D., Vinya S Ariyaratne V.S, Balangoda Muhamdiramlage Indika Gunawardana B.M.I., Rajapaksha R.M. N.U., W M Prasad Chathuranga Weerasinghe W.M. P.C., Gomez P., Chandraratna S., Suveendran T, Palitha Karunapema R.P. P. (2021), Role of Religious Leaders in COVID-19 Prevention: a Community-Level Prevention Model in Sri Lanka, “J. Relig. Health”, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34812996/ (17.11.2022).
Google Scholar

Van Drooghenbroeck s. (2020), Les dérogations à la CEDH : la question de l’article 15, paper presented at the webinar on “La liberté de religion aux temps du Coronavirus”, June 24 2020, https://dres.misha.cnrs.fr/IMG/pdf/art15_van_drooghenbroeck-1.pdf (29.12. 2021).
Google Scholar

Ventura M. (2021), Concluding Remarks, Conference on “Religious Freedom Before, During and After COVID-19 between Europe and the Member States, November 26 2021, https://www.units.it/news/religious-freedom-during-and-after-covid-19-between-europe-and-member-states (28.12.2021).
Google Scholar