Voegelin’s Escape from Legal Positivism: Constitutionalism and the Politico-Religious Problem

Michał Kuź

doi:10.21697/CSP.2024.28.1.08

Opublikowane: 2024-11-25

Nr 28 (2024)

Voegelin’s Escape from Legal Positivism: Constitutionalism and the Politico-Religious Problem

Michał Kuź

Chrześcijaństwo-Świat-Polityka

Dział: Temat numeru

https://doi.org/10.21697/CSP.2024.28.1.08

Abstrakt

The following article deals with the polemic between Eric Voegelin’s political philosophy and the legal positivism of Hans Kelsen. The research question deals with the importance of this polemic, following a key text analysis. Based on Voegelin’s early writings, the Munich lectures and autobiographical reflection on his postgraduate studies, I argue that it is the critique of Kelsen’s legal positivism that gave Voegelin the initial impulse to develop his own philosophy of politics. Specifically, it led him to his project of investigating the basis of the functioning of different political bodies and to the conclusion that they are not structures which can be adequately researched without considering the absolute values (as elements of the “structure of being”). This philosophical reflection has a significant impact on the theory of law and constitutionalism; it however, does not provide a satisfactory answer to the practical politico-religious problem, or, in other words, the problem of theologizing and thus absolutizing ordinary politics.

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Kuź, M. (2024). Voegelin’s Escape from Legal Positivism: Constitutionalism and the Politico-Religious Problem. Chrześcijaństwo-Świat-Polityka, (28), 132–143. https://doi.org/10.21697/CSP.2024.28.1.08

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Cooper Barry (2023), Hans Kelsen and Eric Voegelin: The History of a Divergence, „The Political Science Reviewer” vol. 47 (1): 61-91.
Google Scholar

Corwin E. (2008 [1928]), The “Higher Law” Background of American Constitutional Law, Liberty Fund, Indianapolis.
Google Scholar

Bindreiter U. (2002), Why Grundnorm: A Treatise on the Implications of Kelsen's Doctrine, Kluwe Law International, Haga, Londyn, Nowy York.
Google Scholar

Goldberg J. (2007), Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left, From Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning, Doubleday, New York.
Google Scholar

Gardner John (2001), Legal Positivism: 5½ Myths, ”American Journal of Jurisprudence”, vol. 46, p. 199-227.
Google Scholar

Franz M. (2001), Commentaries on the Work of Eric Voegelin, ”The Political Science Reviewer”, vol. 30, https://politicalsciencereviewer.wisc.edu/index.php/psr/article/view/406 (17.10.2024).
Google Scholar

George R. P. (ed.) (1996), The Autonomy of Law: Essays on Legal Positivism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Google Scholar

Katrougalos G., Mathieu, B. (2023), The Crisis of Liberal Democracy Diagnostics and Therapies, Intersentia, Cambridge, Antwerpia, Chicago.
Google Scholar

Kelsen H. (1949), General Theory of Law and State. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
Google Scholar

Kelsen H. (2004), A New Science of Politics Hans Kelsen's Reply to Eric Voegelin's "New Science of Politics", A 'Contribution to the Critique of Ideology, Ontos Verlag, Heusenstamm.
Google Scholar

Kuź M. (2016), Voegelinowska koncepcja symboli politycznych. Teoria i zastosowania, „Ateneum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne” vol. 51.
Google Scholar

Munck G, L., Snyder, R. (2007), Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Google Scholar

Miller Gary J. (1997), The Impact of Economics on Contemporary Political Science, „Journal of Economic Literature”, vol. 35, no. 3.
Google Scholar

Reiter B. (2017), The Crisis of Liberal Democracy and the Path Ahead: Alternatives to Political Representation and Capitalism (Radical Subjects in International Politics), Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Londyn.
Google Scholar

Sandoz E. (2011), What is a Mystic Philosopher and Why does it Matter? Preliminary Reflections, “APSA 2011 Annual Meeting Paper, Available at SSRN”, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1903028 (28.03.2024).
Google Scholar

Schmitt C. (2007 [1932]), The Concept of the Political, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Google Scholar

Rumble Wilfred E. (1985), The Thought of John Austin: Jurisprudence, Colonial Reform, and the British Constitution. London: Athlone Press.
Google Scholar

Trepanier L. (2017), Teaching in an Age of Ideology: Ellis Sandoz, “Voegelin View”, https://voegelinview.com/teaching-age-ideology-ellis-sandoz/ (28.03.2024).
Google Scholar

PSQ (2024), PSQ History, https://www.psqonline.org/History.cfm (28.03.2024).
Google Scholar

Szlachta B. (2022), Demokracja liberalna. Źródła, ustanowienie (?) i kres, Instytut De Republica, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

UN, 1946, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, https://legal.un.org/avl/pdf/ha/cppcg/cppcg_ph_e.pdf (28.03.2024).
Google Scholar

Voegelin E. (1999), Hitler and the Germans, University of Missouri Press, Columbia.
Google Scholar

Voegelin E. (1999b [1936]), The Authoritarian State and Essay on the Problem of the Austrian Stat, Collected Works Eric Voegelin Volume 4, University of Missouri Press, Columbia and London.
Google Scholar

Voegelin E. (1997 [1933]), Race and the State, Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
Google Scholar

Voegelin E. (1996 [1989]), Autobiographical Reflections, Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge.
Google Scholar

Voegelin E. (1987 [1952]), New Science of Politics, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
Google Scholar

Voegelin E. (1975), From Enlightenment to Revolution, Duke University Press, Durham.
Google Scholar

Weiss G. (1999), Introduction, [in:] E. Voegelin, The Authoritarian State and Essay on the Problem of the Austrian Stat, Collected Works Eric Voegelin Volume 4, University of Missouri Press, Columbia and London.
Google Scholar