Data publikacji : 2020-05-27

The censorship of speech about Islam before the European Court of Human Rights: the appalling case of E. S. v. Austria

Dział: Artykuły


The European Court of Human Rights has often issued judgments protecting individuals who have been accused of blasphemy, especially against the Christian religion. Meanwhile, he upheld the condemnation of the conviction decision of the blasphemy Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff by Austrian courts, who publicly described Mohammed's known marriage to a minor girl as pedophilia. The Austrian court officially confessed that it had to condemn these words in the name of religious peace. The ECtHR upheld this judgment in the name of religious tolerance, somewhat suspending previous case law and not censoring any statements criticizing Islam, even if they were true. This violation of freedom of expression is justified by a new positive obligation imposed on you by the Tribunal, consisting in "ensuring peaceful coexistence of all religions and those who do not belong to any religious group, by ensuring mutual tolerance." In this way, any statement, even a true one, can be considered reprehensible as an expression of religious intolerance, if it could lead to social tensions.

Słowa kluczowe

European Court of Human Rights ; Austria ; freedom of speech ; Islam ; Muhammad


Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Wskaźniki altmetryczne


Autorzy udzielają licencji wydawniczej na publikację artykułu

Wydawnictwo Naukowe UKSW
ul. Dewajtis 5, domek nr 2
01-815 Warszawa
tel. +48 22 561 89 23 (wew. 323)
O platformie:
Copyright 2019 by UKSW
OJS Support and Customization by LIBCOM
Platform & workfow by OJS/PKP
O systemie