International leadership models in the assumptions of the theory of realism

Monika Brzezińska

Publié le: 2023-12-06

Vol. 4 (2022)

International leadership models in the assumptions of the theory of realism

Monika Brzezińska

Résumé

This article is of theoretical nature and aims to try to define various models of international leadership and their nature in the light of the assumptions of realism. The main research determinants include the ones typical for the abovementioned theory, such as an actor’s identity, its position in the system, as well as the source of power and interdependencies to which it is subjected. These, on the other hand, may turn out to be useful in outlining types of international leadership represented by particular players.
In realism international leaders (states) attempt at attaining their goals by maximizing their own power, security or by exerting influence. The tools and methods they use depend on their feeling of identity, therefore, they choose the path of aggression, negotiation or peaceful cooperation. Thanks to this and as a result of influence exerted by other international leaders and the structure itself, they occupy a particular position in the international environment. This position determines their attitude to each other and to the system in which they function (and vice versa). In this way international roles played by the international leaders are built. Such roles are not permanent. They require revision of observation of factors inside the state and in the system, as well as acceptance of other leaders (it is not enough for an actor to want to be a hegemonic leader to be acknowledged as such by others).

Télécharger des fichiers

PDF (English)

Règles de citation

Brzezińska, M. (2023). International leadership models in the assumptions of the theory of realism. Politologia, 4, 5–23. Consulté à l’adresse https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/p/article/view/13489

##plugins.themes.libcom.share##

Références

Bieleń S. (2015). Tożsamość uczestników stosunków międzynarodowych. In: Zięba R., Bieleń S. & Zając J. (eds.) Teorie i podejścia badawcze w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 153-176.
Google Scholar

Czaputowicz J. (2014). Mapa współczesnego realizmu: realizm klasyczny, neorealizm, realizm neoklasyczny. In: Haliżak E. & Czaputowicz J. (eds.) Teoria realizmu w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Rambler, pp. 25-41.
Google Scholar

Gałganek A. (1992). Zmiana w globalnym systemie międzynarodowym. Supercykle i wojna hegemoniczna. Wydawnictwo Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza.
Google Scholar

Harnisch S. (2011). Role theory. Operationalization of key concept. In: Harnisch S., Frank C. & Maull H. W. (eds.) Role theory in International relations, Routledge, pp. 7-15.
Google Scholar

Hobbes T. (1914). Leviathan, London J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
Google Scholar

Kaczmarski M. (2015). Realizm neoklasyczny. In: Zięba R., Bieleń S. & Zając J. (eds.) Teorie i podejścia badawcze w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 13-27.
Google Scholar

Mearsheimer J.J. (2014). The tragedy of great power politics. W.W. Norton & Co.
Google Scholar

Morgenthau H.J. (2010). Polityka między narodami. Walka o potęgę i pokój. Difin.
Google Scholar

Nabers D. (2011). Identity and role change in international politics. In: Harnisch S., Frank C. & Maull H.M. (eds.) Role theory in International Relations. Routledge, pp. 74-92.
Google Scholar

Niebuhr R. (1945). The children of light and the children of darkness. A. vindication of democracy and a critique of its traditional defenders. Nisbet & Co. Ltd.
Google Scholar

Pawłuszko T. (2015). Kategoria systemu międzynarodowego w badaniach stosunków międzynarodowych. In: Zięba R., Bieleń S. & Zając J. (eds.) Teorie i podejścia badawcze w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 261-282.
Google Scholar

Pietraś Z.J. (1990). Międzynarodowa rola Chin. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.
Google Scholar

Pietraś Z.J. (2000). Decydowanie polityczne. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Schweller R. (1994). Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In. International Security, 19(1): 72-107. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2539149.
Google Scholar

Schweller R. (2006). Unanswered threats: political constraints on the balance of power. Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Thompson K.W. (1960). Political Realism and the Crisis of World Politics. Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Tomczyńska A. (2014). Realizm ofensywny Johna J. Mearsheimera a hegemonia Stanów Zjednoczonych Ameryki po zimnej wojnie. In: Haliżak E., Czaputowicz J. (eds.) Teoria realizmu w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Założenia i zastosowania badawcze. Rambler, pp. 341-356.
Google Scholar

Turner R.H. (2001). Role Theory. In: Turner R. (eds.) Handbook of Sociological Theory. Springer, pp. 233-254.
Google Scholar

Walt S.M. (1985). Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power. International Security, 9(4): 3-43. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2538540.
Google Scholar

Walt S.M. (2017). Who’s afraid of a balance of power? Available at: https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/12/08/whos-afraid-of-a-balance-of-power/ (15.02.2019).
Google Scholar

Waltz K.N. (1988). The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4): 615-628. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/204817.
Google Scholar

Waltz K.N. (2001). Man, the State and War. A. theoretical analysis. University Press Group Ltd.
Google Scholar

Waltz K.N. (2010). Struktura teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Scholar.
Google Scholar

Więcławski J. (2011). Hans Morgenthau, realizm klasyczny i jego rekomendacje dla polskiej polityki zagranicznej. Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna, 3(34): 117-140.
Google Scholar

Wohlforth W.C. (1993). The elusive balance. Power and perception during the Cold War. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar

Wohlforth W.C. (Winter, 1994-1995). Realism and the End of the Cold War. International Security, 19(3): 91-129. DOI https://doi.org/10.2307/2539080.
Google Scholar

Wojciuk A. (2010). Dylemat potęgi. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Google Scholar

Zając J. (2015). Teoria ról międzynarodowych. In: Zięba R., Bieleń S. & J. Zając (eds.) Teorie i podejścia badawcze w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, pp. 127-151.
Google Scholar

Zakaria F. (1998). From wealth to power: The unusual origins of America’s world role. Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Zakaria F. (2008). The Post-American world. W.W. Norton & Co.
Google Scholar