Assessment and Quantification of Damages in Private   and Public International Law: an Overview

Marcin Kałduński

doi:10.21697/2022.12.2.08

Published : 2022-12-19

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022)

Assessment and Quantification of Damages in Private and Public International Law: an Overview

Marcin Kałduński

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2179-5733

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/2022.12.2.08

Abstract

This piece is a modest tribute to Professor Gilas who has long been the author’s tutor during the author’s academic career. Its purpose is to concisely describe how international law on damages has evolved, taking into particular account the jurisprudence of international courts and tribunals as well as domestic courts. The topic of damages is important in practice, but seems to be neglected in the doctrine. The author thus wishes to make an overview on the assessment and quantification of damages. To this end, the article starts with a presentation of basic principles to discuss further the burden and standard of proof, entitlement to damages, assessment of amount of damages, quantification of damages, reduction of damages, including causation, prohibition of speculative damages, contributory fault, foreseeability, mitigation and the prohibition of double recovery. Article concludes with final observations.

Keywords:

damages, responsibility, compensation, reduction of damages

Details

References

Statistics

Authors

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Kałduński, M. (2022). Assessment and Quantification of Damages in Private and Public International Law: an Overview . Polish Review of International and European Law, 12(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.21697/2022.12.2.08

Altmetric indicators

Cited by / Share

References

Abdala, Manuel A., Spiller, Pablo. “Chorzów’s Standard Rejuvenated: Assessing Damages in Investment Treaty Arbitrations.” Journal of International Arbitration, 2008, 25(1).

Bénabent, Alain. Droit des obligations. Paris, 2021.

Butler, Petra. “Damages Principles under the Convention on Contracts for International Sale of Goods.” In The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, edited by Trenor John, A. London: Law Business Research Ltd, 2020.

Cheng, Bin. General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge, 1953.

von Bar, Christian. The Common European Law of Torts. Vol. 2. Munich, 2000.

Connellan, Clare, Oger-Gross, Elizabeth, André, Angélica. “Compensatory Damages Principles in Civil and Common Law jurisdictions: Requirements, Underlying Principles and Limits.” In The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, edited by Trenor John, A. London: Law Business Research Ltd, 2020.

Dellepiane, Santiago, Cardani, Andrea, Honowitz, Julian. “The Applicable Valuation Approach.” In The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, edited by Trenor John, A. London: Law Business Research Ltd, 2020.

Demuth, Alexander. “Income Approach and the Discounted Cash Flow Methodology.” In The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, edited by Trenor John, A. London: Law Business Research Ltd, 2020.

Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission, Ethiopia's Damages Claims, Final Award, 17 August 2009, UNRIAA, vol. XXVI.

Gotanda, John. “Assessing Damages in International Commercial Arbitration: A Comparison with Investment Treaty Disputes.” 6 Transnational Dispute Management, 2007.

Gotanda, John. “Damages in Lieu of Performance because of Breach of Contract, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law." Working Paper Series, 2006.

Haberman, Philip, Perks, Liz. “Overview of Methodologies for Assessing Fair Market Value”, In The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, edited by Trenor John, A. London: Law Business Research Ltd, 2020.

Horn, Richard, Janceckova, Zuzana, Yin, Yie, Bivolaris, Konstantinos. “Market or Comparables Approach.” In The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, edited by Trenor John, A. London: Law Business Research Ltd, 2020.

ILC, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with Commentaries (2001).

ILC, Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts in Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of its Fifty-Third Session, UN GAOR 56th Session, Supp. No. 10.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. B3 Croatian Courier Coöperatief U.A. v. Republic of Croatia, Case No. ARB/15/5, Award, 5 April 2019.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Bernhard von Pezold and others v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Case No. ARB/10/15, Award, 28 July 2015.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v. United Republic of Tanzania, Case No. ARB/05/22, Award, 24 July 2008.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Border Timbers Limited, Border Timbers International (Private) Limited and Hangani Development Co. (Private) Limited v. Republic of Zimbabwe, Case No. ARB/10/25, Award, 28 July 2015.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Conocophillips Petrozuata B.V., Conocophillips Hamaca B.V. and Conocophillips Gulf of Paria B.V. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Case No. ARB/07/30, Award, 8 March 2019.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. EDF International S.A., SAUR International S.A. and León Participaciones Argentinas S.A. v. Argentine Republic, Case No. ARB/03/23, Award of 11 June 2012.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. HOCHTIEF Aktiengesellschaft v. Argentine Republic, Case No. ARB/07/31, Decision on Liability, 29 December 2014.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Ioan Micula and others v. Romania I, Case No. ARB/05/20, Award, 11 December 2013.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Magyar Farming Company Ltd, Kintyre Kft and Inicia Zrt v. Hungary, Case No. ARB/17/27, Award, 13 November 2019.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling Co. S.A. v. Arab Republic of Egypt, Case No. ARB/99/6, Award, 12 April 2002.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. MTD Equity Sdn. Bhd. and MTD Chile S.A. v. Republic of Chile, Case No. ARB/01/7, Award of 25 May 2004.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v. The Republic of Ecuador, Case No. ARB/06/11, Award of 5 October 2012.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A v. Argentine Republic, Case No. ARB/03/19, Award, 9 April 2015.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Tethyan Copper Company Pty Limited v. Islamic Republic of Pakistan, Case No. ARB/12/1, Award of 12 July 2019.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Total S.A. v. Argentine Republic, Case No. ARB/04/1, Award, 27 November 2013.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Biskaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v. Argentine Republic, Case No. ARB/07/26, Decision on Jurisdiction, 19 December 2012.

International Centre for Settelment of Investment Disputes. Venezuela Holdings B.V. and others (formerly Mobil Corporation and others) v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Case No. ARB/07/27, Award, 9 October 2014.

International Court of Justice. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment of 26 February 2007.

International Court of Justice. Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) (Reparations), Judgment of 9 February 2022.

International Court of Justice. Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua) (Compensation), Judgment of 2 February 2018.

International Court of Justice. Corfu Channel (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Albania), Merits, Judgment of 9 April 1949.

International Court of Justice. Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI) (United States of America v. Italy), Judgment of 20 July 1989.

International Court of Justice. Factory at Chorzów, Series A, no. 9.

International Court of Justice. Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary/Slovakia), Judgment of 25 September 1997.

International Court of Justice. LaGrand (Germany v. United States of America), Judgment, Reports 2001.

International Court of Justice. Separate Opinion by Sir Arnold McNair, International Status of South West Africa, Advisory Opinion of 11 July 1950, Report 1950.

Kantor, Mark. “Valuation for Arbitration: Compensation Standards, Valuation Methods and Expert Evidence”, The Journal of World Energy Law & Business, New York, 2008.

Lauterpacht, Hersch. The Development of International Law by the International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge, 1958.

MacGregor, Gervase, Blower, Susan, Mitchell, David. “Overview of Damages and Accounting Basics.” In The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, edited by Trenor John, A. London: Law Business Research Ltd, 2020.

McGregor, Harvey, Edelman, James. McGregor on Damages. London, 2017.

Miles, Craig, Weiss, David. “Overview of Principles Reducing Damages.” In The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, edited by Trenor John, A. London: Law Business Research Ltd, 2020..

Permanent Court of Arbitration. Copper Mesa Mining Corporation v. Republic of Ecuador, Case No. 2012-2, Award, 15 March 2016.

Permanent Court of Arbitration. Cairn Energy PLC and Cairn UK Holdings Limited (CUHL) v. Republic of India, Case No. 2016-07, Award, 21 December 2020.

Permanent Court of International Justice. Case concerning Certain German Interests in Polish Upper Silesia (Germany v. Poland), 13 September 1928, Series A, No. 17.

Permanent Court of Arbitration. CC/Devas (Mauritius) Ltd., Devas Employees Mauritius Private Limited and Telcom Devas Mauritius Limited v. Republic of India, Case No. 2013-09, Award on Quantum, 13 October 2020.

Permanent Court of Arbitration. Chevron Corporation (U.S.A.) and Texaco Petroleum Corporation (U.S.A.) v. Republic of Ecuador I, Case No. 2007-02/AA277, Partial Award on the Merits, 30 March 2010.

Permanent Court of Arbitration. Hulley Enterprises Limited (Cyprus) v. The Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, Case No. AA 226 Final Awards of 18 July 2014.

Permanent Court of Arbitration. Veteran Petroleum Limited (Cyprus) v. The Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, Case No. AA 228 Final Awards of 18 July 2014.

Permanent Court of Arbitration. Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v. The Russian Federation, UNCITRAL, No. AA 227 Final Awards of 18 July 2014.

Portugal contre Allemagne, Responsibilité de l’Allemagne à raison des dommages causés dans les colonies portugaises du sud de l’Afrique (sentence sur le principe de la responsabilité), Lausanne, 30 June 1930, UNRIAA, vol. II.

Robinson v. Harman (1848) 13 P.D. 191 (C.A.).

Sabahi, Borzu. Compensation and Restitution in Investor-State Arbitration: Principles and Practice. Oxford, 2011.

Sadowski, Wojciech. “Yukos and Contributory Fault”, TDM 12(5) (2015).

Salmon, Jean. “Des mains propres» comme condition de recevabilité des reclamations internationals.” Annuaire Français de Droit International, Année, 1964, vol. 10.

Salvioli, Gabriele. "La responsabilité des Etats et la fixation des dommages et intérêts par les tribunaux internationaux." RCADI 1929, vol. 28.

Shon, Louis, Baxter, B.B. “Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens.” American Journal of International Law, 1961, vol. 55.

Smith, Stephen, Atiyah P.A. Atiyah’s Introduction to the Law of Contract, Oxford, 2005.

Stoerk, Felix. Nouveau recueil général de traités et autres actes relatifs aux rapports de droit international, 2nd Series, vol. XXX, Leipzig, 1904.

UNIDROIT Principles 2010, Article 7.4.3

United Kingdom House of Lords. Livingstone v. Rawyards Coal Co (1880), 3 (13 February 1880).

United Nations Commission On International Trade Law. S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada, Partial Award, 13 November 2000.

United Nations Reports of International Arbitral Awards. Francisco Mallén (United Mexican States) v. U.S.A., Award of 27 April 1927, vol. IV.

United Nations Reports of International Arbitral Awards. Responsabilité de l’Allemagne à raison des dommages causés dans les colonies portugaises du sud de l’Afrique (sentence sur le principe de la responsabilité). Portugal contre Allemagne, Lausanne, 31 July 1928, vol. II.

United Nations Reports of International Arbitral Awards. Teodoro García and M. A. Garza (United Mexican States) v. U.S.A., Decision of 3 December 1926 r., vol. IV.

Wöss, Herfried, San Román Rivera, Adriana, Spiller, Pablo, Dellepiane, Santiago. “Full Compensation, Full Reparation and the But-For Premise.” In The Guide to Damages in International Arbitration, edited by Trenor John, A. London: Law Business Research Ltd, 2020.

Wöss, Herfried, San Román Rivera, Adriana, Spiller, Pablo, Dellepiane, Santiago. Damages in International Arbitration under Complex Long-Term Contracts. Oxford, 2014.