Safeguarding Ukraine’s Cultural Heritage in War: Identifying the Obligations of Non-Parties to the Conflict, with Special Focus on the European Union

Andrzej Jakubowski

doi:10.21697/2023.12.2.06

Published: 2024-02-13

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023)

Safeguarding Ukraine’s Cultural Heritage in War: Identifying the Obligations of Non-Parties to the Conflict, with Special Focus on the European Union

Andrzej Jakubowski

Polish Review of International and European Law

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/2023.12.2.06

Abstract

Russia’s aggression against Ukraine is a true war against cultural heritage. However, while international law regulates the obligations and duties of parties to an armed con"ict, the eective protection of cultural heritage largely depends on the conduct of non-participants. Hence this article addresses the nature and content of the legal obligations to protect Ukraine’s cultural heritage incumbent on non-parties to the con"ict. Its main focus is on the European Union (EU) due to its close political, legal, economic and cultural ties with Ukraine. It explains that cultural considerations today permeate almost all EU policies. In addition, Member States and the Union itself are bound by a number of international law obligations in relation to cultural heritage and cultural rights. This article further demonstrates that such obligations increasingly address the protection of heritage as a common good of all humankind, linked to the maintenance of global peace and security, and to the protection and promotion of all human rights. While referring to the EU’s current practice in safeguarding Ukraine’s heritage, this article envisages and advocates further developments in this respect.

Keywords:

European Union, Ukraine, armed conflict, human right, international cultural heritage law

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Jakubowski, A. (2024). Safeguarding Ukraine’s Cultural Heritage in War: Identifying the Obligations of Non-Parties to the Conflict, with Special Focus on the European Union. Polish Review of International and European Law, 12(2), 141–166. https://doi.org/10.21697/2023.12.2.06

Cited by / Share

References

Akinsha, Konstantin (2023). “Scythian Gold Is at the Heart of Russia’s Identity War.” The Art Newspaper [online edn.], 19 January 2023.
Google Scholar

Antonopoulos, Constantine. Non-Participation in Armed Con"ict. Continuity and Modern Challenges to the Law of Neutrality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022.
Google Scholar

Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, done 21 March 2014, [2014] OJ L161/3 (as amended).
Google Scholar

Blake, Janet. International Cultural Heritage Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Google Scholar

Bushard, Brian. “These are Some of the Most Famous Ukrainian Works of Art Looted by Russia.” Forbes [online edn.], 14 January 2023.
Google Scholar

Campbell, Matthiew. “Russia’s Art Raids in Ukraine Are the Biggest Treasure Loots since Nazis.” The Times [online edn.], 5 February 2023.
Google Scholar

Campfens, Evelien. Study for JURI Committee – Cross-border claims to looted art. European Parliament, Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, Brussels, 2023.
Google Scholar

Campfens, Evelien, Andrzej Jakubowski, Kristin Hausler, and Elke Selter.
Google Scholar

Research for Cult Committee – Protecting Cultural Heritage from Armed Conflicts in Ukraine and Beyond. European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Brussels, 2023.
Google Scholar

CESCR, General Comment No. 3: The nature of States parties obligations (Art. 2, para 1), 14 December 1990, E/1991/23; 1(1) IHRR 6 (1999).
Google Scholar

Charter of the United Nations, opened for signature June 26, 1945, 1 UNTS XVI, as amended.
Google Scholar

CoE, Parliamentary Assembly, “Cultural heritage in crisis and post-crisis situations”, Resolution 2057 (2015), <https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref- XML2HTML-EN.asp?+leid=21784&lang=en> accessed 20 October 2023.
Google Scholar

Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage, opened for signature 16 November 1972, 1037 UNTS 151.
Google Scholar

Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Con"ict, opened for signature 14 May 1954, 249 UNTS 240.
Google Scholar

Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property, opened for signature 14 November 1970, 823 UNTS 231.
Google Scholar

Coomans, Fons. “The Extraterritorial Scope of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Work of the United Nations Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.” Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 11, No. 1 (2011): 1-35.
Google Scholar

Declaration on the Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage, adopted 17 October 2003, UNESCO Doc. 32 C/Resolutions Res 33.
Google Scholar

Dixon, Robyn. “Russia Sending Teachers to Ukraine to Control What Students Learn.” The Washington Post [online edn.], 18 July 2022.
Google Scholar

EU EEAS, Concept on Cultural heritage in con"icts and crises. A component for peace and security in European Union’s external action, 9962/21, Brussels, 18 June 2021.
Google Scholar

EU, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: on the EU’s humanitarian action: new challenges, same principles, COM(2021)110, Brussels, 10 March 2021.
Google Scholar

EU, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, The European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the EU Security Union Strategy, COM(2020)605, Brussels, 24 July 2020.
Google Scholar

EU, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament,
Google Scholar

the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the EU Strategy to Tackle Organised Crime 2021-2025, COM(2021) 170, Brussels, 14 April 2021.
Google Scholar

EU, Conclusions of the Council and of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States, meeting within the Council, on the establishment of a Civilian CSDP Compact, 9588/23, 22 May 2023.
Google Scholar

EU, Consolidated text of the Council Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 of 17 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine (15 September 2023), ANNEX I, <https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02014R0269-20230624&qid=1691093648547> accessed 19 October 2023.
Google Scholar

EU, Council conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe (21 May 2014) [2014] OJ C183/36.
Google Scholar

EU, Council conclusions on EU approach to cultural heritage in con"icts and crises, 9837/21, Brussels, 21 June 2021.
Google Scholar

EU, Council Conclusions on operationalising the humanitarian-development nexus, 9417/17, Brussels, 19 May 2017.
Google Scholar

EU, Council conclusions on the need to bring cultural heritage to the fore across policies in the EU (23 May 2018), [2018] OJ C196/20.
Google Scholar

EU, Directive (EU) 2018/843 of the European Parliament of 30 May 2018 amending Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the +nancial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist +nancing, and amending Directives 2009/138/EC and 2013/36/EU, [2018] OJ L156/43.
Google Scholar

EU, European Council meeting (23 and 24 June 2022) – Conclusions, EUCO 24/22, Brussels, 24 June 2022.
Google Scholar

EU, Regulation (EU) 2019/880 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the introduction and the import of cultural goods [2019] OJ L151/1.
Google Scholar

EU, Regulation (EU) No. 1210/2003 of the Council of 7 July 2003 concerning certain speci+c restrictions on economic and +nancial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No. 2465/96, [2003] OJ L169/6.
Google Scholar

EU, Regulation (EU) No. 1332/2013 of the Council of 13 December 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No. 36/2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria, [2013] OJ L335/3.
Google Scholar

EU, Updated European Union Guidelines on promoting compliance with international humanitarian law (IHL) [2009] OJ C303/12.
Google Scholar

Frigo, Manlio. “Approaches Taken by the Security Council to the Global Protection of Cultural Heritage: An Evolving Role in Preventing Unlawful Trac of Cultural Property.” Rivista di diritto internazionale, Vol. 101, No. 4 (2018): 1164-81.
Google Scholar

Hausler, Kristin. “Cultural Heritage and the Security Council: Why Resolution 2347 Matters.” Questions of International Law, No. 48 (2018): 5-19.
Google Scholar

Hausler, Kristin. “The EU Approach to Cultural Heritage in Con"ict and Crisis: An Elephant in the Room?” Santander Art and Culture Law Review, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2021): 193-202.
Google Scholar

Hausler, Kristin, Jakubowski, Andrzej. “Combating Illicit Trade in Cultural Objects to Defend Peace and Security”. In The Preservation of Art and Culture in Times of War, edited by Claire Finkelstein, Derek Gillman and Frederik Rosén, 161-85. New York: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Google Scholar

ICC OTP, “Policy on Cultural Heritage” (June 2021), para. 26, available at accessed 20 October 2023.
Google Scholar

ICJ, Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Armenia v. Azerbaijan), Provisional Measures, ICJ order of 7 December 2021, available at <https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/+les/case- related/180/180-20230706-ord-01-00-en.pdf> accessed 20 October 2023.
Google Scholar

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, opened for signature December 16, 1966, 993 UNTS 3.
Google Scholar

Jakubowski, Andrzej. “Black Sea Tomb Raiders and the Practice of Global Cultural Exchange: Revisiting the Ethics and Responsibility of Museums.” Art, Antiquity and Law, Vol. 19, No. 1 (2014): 75-86.
Google Scholar

Jakubowski, Andrzej. “International Protection of Cultural Heritage in Armed Con"ict: Revisiting the Role of Safe Havens.” Indonesian Journal of International Law, Vol. 16, No. 2 (2019): 169-90.
Google Scholar

Jakubowski, Andrzej, Hausler, Kristin, Fiorentini, Francesca, eds. Cultural Heritage in the European Union. A Critical Inquiry into Law and Policy. Boston- Leiden: Brill, 2019.
Google Scholar

Kwiecie¬, Roman. “The Aggression of the Russian Federation Against Ukraine: International Law and Power Politics or ‘What Happens Now.” Polish Review of International and European Law, Vol. 11, No. 1 (2022): 9-21.
Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko. Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties: Law, Principles, and Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Google Scholar

Mullins, Charlotte. “Ukraine’s Heritage Is under Direct Attack’: Why Russia Is Looting the Country’s Museums.” The Guardian [online edn.], 27 May 2022.
Google Scholar

Munawar, Nour A., Symonds, James. “Empires of Lies? The Political Uses of Cultural Heritage in War.” The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, https:// doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2023.2205193.
Google Scholar

O’Keefe, Roger. “Cultural Heritage and International Humanitarian Law”. In The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, edited by Francioni, Francesco, Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa, 43-74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Google Scholar

Pietz, Tobias, Schmidtke, Maximilian. “EU CSDP Missions and the Protection of Cultural Heritage.” Istituto Affari Internazionali Commentaries, No. 19/63 (2019).
Google Scholar

Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Con"ict, opened for signature May 14, 1954, 249 UNTS 358.
Google Scholar

Psychogiopoulou, Evangelia. “Cultural Heritage in European Union Law and Policies.” Legal Issues of Economic Integration, Vol. 45, No. 2 (2018): 177-98.
Google Scholar

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, opened for signature July 17, 1998, 2187 UNTS 90.
Google Scholar

Second Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Con"ict, opened for signature March 26, 1999, 2253 UNTS 2.
Google Scholar

Treaty on the European Union, consolidated version [2016] OJ C202/13.
Google Scholar

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), consolidated version [2016] OJ C202/47.
Google Scholar

UNHRC, “Cultural Rights and the Protection of Cultural Heritage”, Resolution 37/17 (22 March 2018), UN Doc. A/HRC/RES/37/17.
Google Scholar

UNHRC, “The Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage as a Violation
Google Scholar

of Human Rights”, Report by Karima Bennoune, Special Rapporteur in the Field
Google Scholar

of Cultural Rights (9 August 2016), UN Doc. A/71/317.
Google Scholar

UNESCO World Conference on Cultural Policies and Sustainable Development – MONDIACULT 2022, Final Declaration, signed 30 September 2022, UNESCO Doc. MONDIACULT-2022/CPD/6.
Google Scholar

UNESCO, “Damaged Cultural Sites in Ukraine Veri+ed by UNESCO”, 19 October 2023, <https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/damaged-cultural-sites-ukraine-veri+ed-unesco> accessed 20 October 2023.
Google Scholar

UNESCO, “Dialogue with the Special Rapporteur in the Field of Cultural Rights, Ms Alexandra Xanthaki, on the Role of Cultural Rights for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Con"ict (Proposed by Austria)” (2022), UNESCO Doc. C54/22/17.COM/6, <https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000383702> accessed 15 October 2023.
Google Scholar

UNESCO, “Odesa Inscribed on UNESCO’s World Heritage List in the Face of Threats of Destruction” (25 January 2023), available at: <https://www.unesco.org/en/ articles/odesa-inscribed-unescos-world-heritage-list-face-threats-destruction> accessed 20 October 2023.
Google Scholar

UNESCO, “The Role of Culture for Resilience, Peace and Security: a New International Agenda Promoted by UNESCO”, available at <https://en.unesco.org/ The-role-of-culture-for-resilience-peace-and-security> accessed 18 October 2023.
Google Scholar

UNESCO, “Warsaw Recommendation on Recovery and Reconstruction of Cultural Heritage” (8 May 2018), para. 4, <https://whc.unesco.org/document/168799> accessed 19 October 2023.
Google Scholar

UNESCO, General Conference, Res. 3.5 (13 November 1993), UNESCO Doc. 27 C/ Resolutions + CORR.
Google Scholar

UNIDROIT, Convention on Stolen and Illegally Exported Cultural Objects, opened for signature June 24, 1995, 2421 UNTS 457.
Google Scholar

United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime, opened for signature December 12, 2000, 2225 UNTS 209.
Google Scholar

UNSC, Res. 1483 (22 May 2003), UN Doc. S/RES/1483.
Google Scholar

UNSC, Res. 2100 (25 April 2013), UN Doc. S/RES/2100.
Google Scholar

UNSC, Res. 2199 (12 February 2015), UN Doc. S/RES/2199.
Google Scholar

UNSC, Res. 2347, “Maintenance of International Peace and Security” (24 March 2017), UN Doc. S/RES/2347.
Google Scholar

UNSC, Res. 686 (2 March 1991), UN Doc. S/RES/686.
Google Scholar

Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa, Francioni, Francesco. “Introduction”. In The Oxford Handbook of International Cultural Heritage Law, edited by Francioni, Francesco and Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa, 1-10. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Google Scholar

Zalasi¬ska, Katarzyna, and Brodowska, Aleksandra. Saving Ukraine’s Culture. Polish Support Center for Culture I Ukraine. Activity Report February 2022 – December 2022, Warsaw: National Institute of Cultural Heritage, 2023.
Google Scholar

Zhang, Yue. “Customary International Law and the Rule against Taking Cultural Property as Spoils of War.” Chinese Journal of International Law. Vol. 17, No. 4 (2018): 943-89.
Google Scholar