From Non-intervention to Positive Obligations: Addressing Privatised Political  Interference under International Law

Florian Bayer

doi:10.21697/2025.14.1.02

Published: 2025-08-30

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)

From Non-intervention to Positive Obligations: Addressing Privatised Political Interference under International Law

Florian Bayer

Polish Review of International and European Law

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/2025.14.1.02

Abstract

This article examines whether international law can address the issue of foreign political interference by powerful private actors whose actions distort public discourse, interfere with free and fair elections, and undermine public trust in democratic institutions. This encroaches upon the sovereignty of states. At the heart of the inquiry lies a structural tension: while international law focuses on the behaviour and accountability of states, the most disruptive forms of political influence today often originate from entities that lack governmental authority or recognised legal status. Therefore, the central question is whether international law can meaningfully engage with this emerging form of privatised interference and, if so, how.

Firstly, the article analyses whether the principle of non-intervention, which lies at the core of protecting the sovereign equality of states, can be applied to such interferences. Secondly, it considers how the conduct of private actors can be attributed to a state. Finally, it explores whether other existing legal doctrines, most notably the no-harm principle and positive human rights obligations, can address the resulting accountability gap. Rather than offering definitive answers, the article highlights the limitations of a state-centric legal system when confronted with privatised power. At the same time, it outlines interpretive pathways through which international law might evolve to address this issue.

Keywords:

non-intervention, political interference, positive obligations, attribution

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Bayer, F. (2025). From Non-intervention to Positive Obligations: Addressing Privatised Political Interference under International Law. Polish Review of International and European Law, 14(1), 51–100. https://doi.org/10.21697/2025.14.1.02

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Adeyeye, Adefolake. “Corporate Responsibility in International Law: Which Way to Go?” Singapore Yearbook of International Law 11 (2007): 141–161.
Google Scholar

Arnauld, Andreas von. Völkerrecht. 4th ed. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller, 2019.
Google Scholar

Aspremont, Jean d’. “The Systemic Integration of International Law by Domestic Courts: Domestic Judges as Architects of the Consistency of the International Legal Order.” In The Practice of International and National Courts and the (De)Fragmentation of International Law. Hart Publishing, 2012.
Google Scholar

Athen, Marco. Der Tatbestand Des Völkerrechtlichen Interventionsverbots. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017.
Google Scholar

Aust, Helmut Philipp. Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Google Scholar

Banks, William. “State Responsibility and Attribution of Cyber Intrusions After Tallinn 2.0.” Texas Law Review 95, no. 7 (2017): 1487–1513.
Google Scholar

Bäumler, Jelena. “Rise and Shine: The No Harm Principle’s Increasing Relevance for the Global Community.” In The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2017, edited by Giuliana Ziccardi Capaldo, 149–74. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha. “The Extraterritoriality of the European Convention on Human Rights: Why Human Rights Depend on Jurisdiction and What Jurisdiction Amounts To.” Leiden Journal of International Law 25, no. 4 (December 2012): 857–884.
Google Scholar

Beyersdorf, Brian. “Regulating the Most Accessible Marketplace of Ideas in History: Disclosure Requirements in Online Political Advertisements after the 2016 Election.” California Law Review 107 (2019): 1061–1100.
Google Scholar

Bjola, Corneliu. “Algorithmic Invasions: How Information Warfare Threatens NATO’s Eastern Flank.” NATO Review, 7 February 2025. https://www.nato.int/docu/review/articles/2025/02/07/algorithmic-invasions-how-information-warfare-threatens-nato-s-eastern-flank/index.html.
Google Scholar

Boon, Kristen E. “Are Control Tests Fit for the Future? The Slippage Problem in Attribution Doctrines.” Melbourne Journal of International Law 15 (2014): 1-48.
Google Scholar

Boon, Kristen E. “Attribution in International Law: Challenges and Evolution.” In States, Firms, and Their Legal Fictions: Attributing Identity and Responsibility to Artificial Entities, edited by Melissa J. Durkee, 25–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2024.
Google Scholar

Brunnée, Jutta. “Sic Utere Tuo Ut Alienum Non Laedas.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, August 2022.
Google Scholar

Colomina, Carme, Héctor Sáchez Margalef, and Richard Yongs. “The Impact of Disinformation on Democratic Processes and Human Rights in the World.” Study. European Parliament, April 2021.
Google Scholar

Conroy, Oliver. “How Elon Musk’s X Became the Global Right’s Supercharged Front Page.” The Guardian, 4 January 2025. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/04/elon-musk-x-trump-far-right.
Google Scholar

Crawford, James. Brownlies Principles of Public International Law. 9th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
Google Scholar

Crawford, James. State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Google Scholar

Damrosch, Lori Fisler. “Politics Across Borders: Nonintervention and Nonforcible Influence over Domestic Affairs.” American Journal of International Law 83, no. 1 (1989): 1-50.
Google Scholar

Danielsen, Dan. “Corporate Power and Global Order.” In International Law and Its Others, edited by Anne Orford, 85–99. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Google Scholar

David, Eric. ‘Portée et Limite Du Principe de Non-Intervention’. Revue Belge de Droit International, no. 2 (1990): 350-367.
Google Scholar

Dawson, Andrew, and Martin Innes. “How Russia’s Internet Research Agency Built Its Disinformation Campaign.” The Political Quarterly 90, no. 2 (June 2019): 245–256.
Google Scholar

De Hoogh, André J. J. “Articles 4 and 8 of the 2001 ILC Articles on State Responsibility, the Tadic Case and Attribution of Acts of Bosnian Serb Authorities to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.” British Yearbook of International Law 72, no. 1 (1 January 2002): 255–292.
Google Scholar

Deluggi, Nicky, and Cameran Ashraf. “Liars, Skeptics, Cheerleaders: Human Rights Implications of Post-Truth Disinformation from State Officials and Politicians.” Human Rights Review 24, no. 3 (2023): 365–387.
Google Scholar

Dörr, Oliver. “Use of Force, Prohibition Of.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, August 2019.
Google Scholar

Duttwiler, Michael. “Authority, Control and Jurisdiction in the Extraterritorial Application of the European Convention on Human Rights.” Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 30, no. 2 (2012): 137-162.
Google Scholar

Duvic-Paoli, Leslie-Anne. The Prevention Principle in International Environmental Law. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Efrony, Dan, and Yuval Shany. “A Rule Book on the Shelf? Tallinn Manual 2.0 on Cyberoperations and Subsequent State Practice.” American Journal of International Law 112, no. 4 (2018): 583–657.
Google Scholar

Grant, Thomas D. “Doctrines (Monroe, Hallstein, Brezhnev, Stimson).” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, March 2014.
Google Scholar

Gross, Anna, and Joe Miller. “Musk Examines How to Oust Starmer as UK Prime Minister before next Election.” Financial Times, 9 January 2025. https://www.ft.com/content/dd4b066c-30a1-4ce4-a95e-82c334a740cf.
Google Scholar

Helal, Mohamed S. “Intervention, Force & Coercion: A Historical Inquiry on the Evolution of the Prohibition on Intervention.” International Law Studies 106 (2025): 206-300.
Google Scholar

Ingram, David, and Bruna Horvath. “How Elon Musk Is Boosting Far-Right Politics across the Globe.” NBC News, 16 February 2025. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/elon-musk/elon-musk-boosting-far-right-politics-globe-rcna189505.
Google Scholar

Jamnejad, Maziar, and Michael Wood. “The Principle of Non-Intervention.” Leiden Journal of International Law 22, no. 2 (June 2009): 345–381.
Google Scholar

Janig, Philipp. “Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights.” In Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights, edited by Christina Binder, Manfred Nowak, Jane A Hofbauer, and Philipp Janig, 180–91. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022.
Google Scholar

Jochum, Heike. “§ 25.” In Parteiengesetz, edited by Jörn Ipsen, 2nd ed. München: C.H.Beck, 2018.
Google Scholar

Jochum, Heike. “§ 27.” In Parteiengesetz, edited by Jörn Ipsen, 2nd ed. München: C.H.Beck, 2018.
Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. The Law of the United Nations. London: Stevens & Sons Ltd., 1951.
Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. “The Principle of Sovereign Equality of States as a Basis for International Organization.” The Yale Law Journal 53, no. 2 (1944): 207-220.
Google Scholar

Kettemann, Matthias C., and Wolfgang Schulz. “Setting Rules for 2.7 Billion: A (First) Look into Facebook’s Norm-Making System; Results of a Pilot Study.” Edited by Leibniz-Institut Für Medienforschung, Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI). Working Papers of the Hans-Bredow-Institut | Works in Progress 1 (2020).
Google Scholar

Koh, Harold Hongju. “The Trump Administration and International Law.” Washburn Law Journal 56 (2017): 413–469.
Google Scholar

Kriener, Florian. “Intervention, Prohibition Of.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, August 2023.
Google Scholar

Kriener, Florian. Proteste Und Intervention. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2024.
Google Scholar

Kunig, Philip. “Intervention, Prohibition Of.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, April 2008.
Google Scholar

Lanza, Edison. “Impact of the IAHRS Principles on Freedom of Expression and the Need for Their Expansion in the Digital Age: Challenges to the IAHRS Principles on Freedom of Expression in the Digital Age.” In The Impact of the Inter-American Human Rights System, edited by Armin Von Bogdandy, Flávia Piovesan, Eduardo Ferrer Mac-Gregor, and Mariela Morales Antoniazzi, 495–518. Oxford University Press, 2024.
Google Scholar

Mačák, Kubo, Talita Dias, and Ágnes Kasper. Handbook on Developing a National Position on International Law and Cyber Activities. University of Exeter and NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Center, 2025.
Google Scholar

Marxsen, Christian. “Territorial Integrity in International Law – Its Concept and Implications for Crimea.” Zeitschrift Für Ausländische Öffentliches Recht Und Völkerrecht 75 (2015): 7–26.
Google Scholar

McCorquodale, Robert. “Spreading Weed Beyond Their Garden: Extraterritorial Responsibility of States for Violations of Human Rights by Corporate Nationals.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 100 (2006): 95.
Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko. “Ecuador Turns Off Julian Assange’s Internet Access.” EJIL:Talk! (blog), 19 October 2016. https://www.ejiltalk.org/ecuador-turns-off-julian-assanges-internet-access/.
Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko. Extraterritorial Application of Human Rights Treaties. Oxford University Press, 2011.
Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko. “Revisiting Coercion as an Element of Prohibited Intervention in International Law.” American Journal of International Law 117, no. 4 (October 2023): 601–650.
Google Scholar

Moynihan, Harriet. “The Application of International Law to State Cyberattacks: Sovereignty and Non-Intervention.” Research Paper. Chatham House, 2019.
Google Scholar

Mueller, Robert S. “Report on the Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election.” U.S. Departement of Justice, March 2019.
Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg. “Article 2(7)”. In The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary, edited by Bruno Simma, Daniel Erasmus-Khan, Georg Nolte, and Paulus, 4th ed., 421–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.
Google Scholar

Ohlin, Jens David. “Did Russian Cyber Interference in the 2016 Election Violate International Law?” Texas Law Review 95 (2017): 1579-1598.
Google Scholar

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. ‘Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and Elections in the Digital Age’, April 2020. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/9/8/451150_0.pdf.
Google Scholar

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. ‘Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and “Fake News”, Disinformation and Propaganda’, March 2017. https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/6/8/302796.pdf.
Google Scholar

Ossoff, William. “Hacking the Domaine Réservé: The Rule of Non-Intervention and Political Interference in Cyberspace.” Harvard International Law Journal 62, no. 1 (2021): 295-323.
Google Scholar

Peters, Anne, and Heike Krieger. “Due Diligence and Structural Change in the International Legal Order.” In Due Diligence in the International Legal Order, edited by Heike Krieger, Anne Peters, and Leonhard Kreuzer. Oxford, 2020.
Google Scholar

Puma, Giuseppe. “The Principle of Non-Intervention in the Face of the Venezuelan Crisis.” Questions de Droit International - Questioni Di Diritto Internazionale 79 (2021): 5–26.
Google Scholar

Raible, Lea. “Between Facts and Principles: Jurisdiction in International Human Rights Law.” Jurisprudence 13, no. 1 (2022): 52–72.
Google Scholar

Ratner, Steven. “Ecuador’s Disconnect of Assange: Politics or Principle?” OpinioJuris (blog), 23 October 2016. https://opiniojuris.org/2016/10/23/ecuadors-disconnect-of-assange-politics-or-principle/.
Google Scholar

‘Regierungspressekonferenz Vom 20. Dezember 2024’. Bundesregierung, 20 December 2024. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/service/archiv/regierungspressekonferenz-vom-20-dezember-2024-2328068.
Google Scholar

Reid, Tim, and Jason Lange. “Musk Spent over a Quarter of a Billion Dollars to Help Elect Trump.” Reuters, 6 December 2024. https://www.reuters.com/world/us/musk-spent-over-quarter-billion-dollars-help-elect-trump-2024-12-06/.
Google Scholar

Roscini, Marco. International Law and the Principle of Non-Intervention: History, Theory, and Interactions with Other Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.
Google Scholar

Rosenau, James N. “The Concept of Intervention.” Journal of International Affairs 22, no. 2 (1968): 165–176.
Google Scholar

Sander, Barrie. “Democracy Under The Influence: Paradigms of State Responsibility for Cyber Influence Operations on Elections.” Chinese Journal of International Law 18, no. 1 (2019): 1–56.
Google Scholar

Sauvé, Mathieu-Robert, and Alexandre Coutant. « Loi Française Contre La Manipulation de l’information En Période Électorale et Pratiques Professionnelles Des Journalistes Face Au Phénomène Des Fake News. » Les Enjeux de l’information et de La Communication N° 23/1A, no. S1 (2024): 103–122.
Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael N. “Foreign Cyber Interference in Elections.” International Law Studies 97 (2021): 739–764.
Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael N. (ed). Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Operations. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Google Scholar

Shrivastava, Abhijeet. “Tackling Foreign Election Interference Through Self-Determination.” Völkerrechtsblog (blog). Accessed 15 May 2025. https://voelkerrechtsblog.org/tackling-foreign-election-interference-through-self-determination/.
Google Scholar

Siggelkow, Pascal. „Wie Musk Sich in Den Wahlkampf Einmischt.“ Tageschau, 24 January 2025. https://web.archive.org/web/20250124043636/https://www.tagesschau.de/faktenfinder/kontext/musk-x-bundestagswahl-100.html. https://www.tagesschau.de/faktenfinder/kontext/musk-x-bundestagswahl-100.html.
Google Scholar

Singh, Krittika, and Timo Koivurova. “Due Diligence.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law. Oxford University Press, August 2022.
Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and William Burke-White. “An International Constitutional Moment.” Harvard International Law Journal 43, no. 1 (2002): 1-21.
Google Scholar

Slaughter, Anne-Marie, and William Burke-White. “The Future of International Law Is Domestic (or, The European Way of Law).” Harvard International Law Journal 47, no. 1 (2006): 327-352.
Google Scholar

Sudworth, John. “Hong Kong Protests Test Beijing’s “Foreign Meddling” Narrative.” BBC, 15 December 2019. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-50753963.
Google Scholar

Talmon, Stefan. “The Responsibility of Outside Powers for Acts of Secessionist Entities.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58, no. 3 (2009): 493–517.
Google Scholar

Tams, Christian J. “The Use of Force against Terrorists.” European Journal of International Law 20, no. 2 (1 April 2009): 359–397.
Google Scholar

Tladi, Dire. “The Duty Not to Intervene in Matters within Domestic Jurisdiction.” In The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50, edited by Jorge E. Viñuales, 87–104. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Google Scholar

Vylegzhanin, Alexander N, Ekaterina A Torkunova, Sergey A Lobanov, and Kirill V Kritskiy. “Forcible Discharge of Ukrainian President Yanukovich from Power: Complicity of the Obama Administration.” Chinese Journal of International Law 20, no. 1 (26 July 2021): 165–172.
Google Scholar

Wheaton, Henry. History of the Law of Nations in Europe and America — From the Earliest Times to the Treaty of Washington, 1842. New York: Gould Banks & Co, 1845.
Google Scholar

Wrange, Pål. “Intervention in National and Private Cyberspace and International Law.” In International Law and Changing Perceptions of Security, edited by Jonas Ebbesson, Marie Jacobsson, Mark Adam Klamberg, David Langlet, and Pål Wrange, 307–326. Brill Nijhoff, 2014.
Google Scholar

Wu, Cecilia Yae. “Challenging Paternalistic Interference: The Case for Non-Intervention in a Globalized World.” Harvard International Law Journal 65, no. 1 (2023): 253–282.
Google Scholar