The Evolution of the International Court of Justice’s Approach to the Right of Actio Popularis Before It, Based on Recent Case Law

Szymon Zaręba

doi:10.21697/2025.14.2.02

Opublikowane: 2026-02-23

Tom 14 Nr 2 (2025)

The Evolution of the International Court of Justice’s Approach to the Right of Actio Popularis Before It, Based on Recent Case Law

Szymon Zaręba

Polish Review of International and European Law

Dział: Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/2025.14.2.02

Abstrakt

The article analyses the jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) relating to the admissibility of actio popularis before it prior to 2020 and then, against this background, demonstrates the extent to which continuity and change can be observed in the Court’s subsequent case law on this topic. The article argues that while the ICJ’s line of jurisprudence on action popularis has generally remained consistent, there has been an important and qualitatively significant evolution in the ICJ’s position over the past few years. This is primarily evident in the Court’s recent acknowledgement of the possibility of bringing actio popularis claims before it based solely on erga omnes norms of customary international law. The text signals some potential challenges this may present. It also highlights that the ICJ still does not seem willing to relax its expectations regarding procedural requirements, such as consent to jurisdiction, which significantly limits the potential impact of allowing actio popularis claims based on norms of customary international law.

Słowa kluczowe:

actio popularis, legal interest , International Court of Justice , standing before the ICJ , international community

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Zaręba, S. (2026). The Evolution of the International Court of Justice’s Approach to the Right of Actio Popularis Before It, Based on Recent Case Law. Polish Review of International and European Law, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.21697/2025.14.2.02

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Aceves, William J. „Actio Popularis – The Class Action in International Law.” University of Chicago Legal Forum (2003), vol. 2003, article 9.
Google Scholar

Ahmadov, Farid. The Right of Actio Popularis before International Courts and Tribunals. Brill, 2018.
Google Scholar

Alland, Denis. “Countermeasures of General Interest.” European Journal of International Law (2002), vol. 13, is. 5.
Google Scholar

Alleged Breaches of Certain International Obligations in respect of the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Nicaragua v. Germany). Provisional Measures. ICJ order of 30 April 2024.
Google Scholar

Alleged Violations of Sovereign Rights and Maritime Spaces in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Colombia, Preliminary Objections. ICJ judgment of 17 March 2016. ICJ Reports 2016.
Google Scholar

Application of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (Canada and Netherlands v. Syrian Arab Republic). Provisional Measures. ICJ order of 16 November 2023. ICJ Reports 2023.
Google Scholar

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar). Preliminary Objections. ICJ judgment of 22 July 2022. ICJ Reports 2022.
Google Scholar

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (The Gambia v. Myanmar). Provisional Measures. ICJ order of 23 January 2020. ICJ Reports 2020.
Google Scholar

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel). Provisional Measures. ICJ order of 26 January 2024.
Google Scholar

Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro). Preliminary Objections. ICJ judgment of 11 July 1996. ICJ Reports 1996.
Google Scholar

Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain), Second Phase. ICJ judgment of 5 February 1970. ICJ Reports 1970.
Google Scholar

Benzing, Markus. “Community Interests in the Procedure of International Courts and Tribunals.” The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals (2006), vol. 5, no. 3.
Google Scholar

Bonafé, Béatrice I. “La violation d'obligations envers la communauté internationale dans son ensemble et la compétence juridictionnelle de la Cour internationale de Justice.” In The Present and Future of Jus Cogens, ed. Enzo Cannizzaro. Sapienza Università Editrice, 2015.
Google Scholar

Chow, Pok Yin S. “On Obligations Erga Omnes Partes.” Georgetown Journal of International Law (2021), vol. 52, no. 2
Google Scholar

Couvreur, Philippe. “The International Court of Justice and the Effectiveness of International Law.” Collected Courses of the Xiamen Academy of International Law (2017), vol. 9.
Google Scholar

Czapliński, Władysław and Wyrozumska, Anna. Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne. Zagadnienia systemowe. CH Beck, 2014.
Google Scholar

Czapliński, Władysław. “Is There a Space for Jus Cogens in Present International Law? Remarks in the Context of a Ban on the Use of Force.” Polish Review of International and European Law (2022), vol. 11, iss. 2.
Google Scholar

D’Argent, Pierre. “The Monetary Gold Principle: A Matter of Submissions.” AJIL Unbound (2021), vol. 115.
Google Scholar

De Wet, Erika. “Invoking obligations erga omnes in the twenty-first century: Progressive developments since Barcelona Traction.” South African Yearbook of International Law (2013), vol. 38.
Google Scholar

Donoghue, Joan E. “The Role of the World Court Today.” Georgia Law Review (2012), vol. 47, no. 1.
Google Scholar

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie. “Back to the Future of a Multilateral Dimension of the Law of State Responsibility for Breaches of ‘Obligations Owed to the International Community as a Whole’.” The European Journal of International Law (2012), vol. 23, no. 4.
Google Scholar

East Timor (Portugal v. Australia). ICJ judgment of 30 June 1995. ICJ Reports 1995.
Google Scholar

Frowein, Jochen A. “Reactions by Not Directly Affected States to Breaches of Public International Law.” Recueil des Cours (1994), vol. 248.
Google Scholar

Gattini, Andrea. “Actio Popularis.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Procedural Law, ed. Hélène Ruiz Fabri and Rüdiger Wolfrum. Oxford University Press, 2019.
Google Scholar

Gould, Harry D. The Legacy of Punishment in International Law. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
Google Scholar

Hachem, Alaa, Hathaway, Oona A. and Cole, Justin. “A New Tool for Enforcing Human Rights: Erga Omnes Partes Standing.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law (2024), vol. 62, no. 2.
Google Scholar

International Court of Justice. Rules of Court (1978) adopted on 14 April 1978 and entered into force on 1 July 1978. https://www.icj-cij.org/index.php/rules.
Google Scholar

International Court of Justice. Statute of the International Court of Justice. 26 June 1945, https://www.icj-cij.org/statute.
Google Scholar

International Law Commission. “Draft Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts.” Yearbook of the International Law Commission (2001) vol. 2.
Google Scholar

International Law Commission. “Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, with commentaries.” Yearbook of the International Law Commission (2001) vol. 2, part 2.
Google Scholar

Kawasaki, Kyoji. “The ‘Injured State’ in the International Law of State Responsibility.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics (2000), vol. 28.
Google Scholar

Kuc, Oktawian. “Obligation to comply with ICJ decisions: the ‘Jurisdictional Immunities’ saga within the Italian legal order.” Studia Iuridica 2024, vol. 102.
Google Scholar

Kwiecień, Roman. “A New Life for Actio Popularis in International Law? The Prevention and Punishment of Genocide as an Interest of ‘the International Community as a Whole’ before the International Court of Justice.” Forum Prawnicze (2024), vol. 84, no. 4.
Google Scholar

Lachowski, Tomasz. “Comments on the ICJ Provisional Measures Orders in the Case of South Africa v. Israel on 26 January 2024, 28 March 2024 and 24 May 2024.” Polish Review of International and European Law (2024), vol. 13, iss. 2.
Google Scholar

Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem. ICJ Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024. ICJ Reports 2024.
Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. ICJ Advisory Opinion of 9 July 2004. ICJ Reports 2004.
Google Scholar

Monetary Gold Removed from Rome in 1943 (Italy v. France, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and United States of America). ICJ judgment of 15 June 1954. ICJ Reports 1954.
Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André. “International Adjudication of Global Public Goods: The Intersection of Substance and Procedure.” The European Journal of International Law (2012), vol. 23, no. 3.
Google Scholar

North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany/Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany/Netherlands). ICJ judgment of 20 February 1969. ICJ Reports 1969.
Google Scholar

Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. United Kingdom). Preliminary Objections. ICJ judgment of 5 October 2016. ICJ Reports 2016.
Google Scholar

Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. India). Jurisdiction and Admissibility. ICJ judgment of 5 October 2016. ICJ Reports 2016.
Google Scholar

Obligations concerning Negotiations relating to Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and to Nuclear Disarmament (Marshall Islands v. Pakistan). Jurisdiction and Admissibility. ICJ judgment of 5 October 2016. ICJ Reports 2016.
Google Scholar

Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change. ICJ Advisory Opinion of 23 July 2025.
Google Scholar

Ostrihansky, Rudolf. „Kompetencja Międzynarodowego Trybunału Sprawiedliwości do rozpoznawania sporów międzypaństwowych.” Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny (1988), no. 2.
Google Scholar

Paddeu, Federica, and Jackson, Miles. “State Responsibility in the ICJ's Advisory Opinion on Climate Change.” EJIL: Talk!, 25 July 2025. https://www.ejiltalk.org/state-responsibility-in-the-icjs-advisory-opinion-on-climate-change/.
Google Scholar

Pezzano, Luciano. “Obligaciones erga omnes y ius standi ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia ¿hacia una actio popularis en el derecho internacional?” Revista de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Nacional de Cordoba (2024), vol. 15, no. 2.
Google Scholar

Ragazzi, Maurizio. The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes. Oxford University Press, 2000.
Google Scholar

Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal). ICJ judgment of 20 July 2012. ICJ Reports 2012.
Google Scholar

Reparation for Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations. ICJ Advisory Opinion of 11 April 1949. ICJ Reports 1949.
Google Scholar

Reservations to the Convention on Genocide. ICJ Advisory Opinion of 28 May 1951. ICJ Reports 1951.
Google Scholar

South West Africa cases (Ethiopia v. South Africa; Liberia v. South Africa). Second Phase. ICJ judgment of 18 July 1966. ICJ Reports 1966.
Google Scholar

Tams, Christian J. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law. Cambridge University Press, 2005.
Google Scholar

Thirlway, Hugh. “Injured and Non-injured States before the International Court of Justice.” In International Responsibility Today. Essays in Memory of Oscar Schachter, ed. Maurizio Ragazzi. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2005.
Google Scholar

Urs, Priya. “Obligations erga omnes and the question of standing before the International Court of Justice.” Leiden Journal of International Law (2021), vol. 34, iss. 2.
Google Scholar

Villalpando, Santiago. “The Legal Dimension of the International Community: How Community Interests Are Protected in International Law.” The European Journal of International Law (2010), vol. 21, no. 2.
Google Scholar