Zasada zachowania integralności prawa do obrony. Analiza przypadków

Marcin Czujek

doi:10.21697/im.2018.29.1.04

Opublikowane: 2018-01-15

Tom 29 Nr 1 (2018)

Zasada zachowania integralności prawa do obrony. Analiza przypadków

Marcin Czujek

Ius Matrimoniale

Dział: Rozprawy i artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2018.29.1.04

Abstrakt

Right of defense, being the actual possibility of intervening the parties is one of the essential elements of the structure of a just process. Preservation of the integrity of this law depends not only on the parties themselves, who are allowed to take any attitude towards their rights, but also, and perhaps above all, this task is for a judge whose goal, in addition to the search for truth is also the concern for the true contradictoriality of the process. The decisions and instances of violation of the integrity of the right to defense discussed in the article, indicate how important is this role in canonical process of the nullity of marriage.

Słowa kluczowe:

prawo do obrony, proces o stwierdzenie nieważności, strony

Pobierz pliki

pdf PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Czujek, M. (2018). Zasada zachowania integralności prawa do obrony. Analiza przypadków. Ius Matrimoniale, 29(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2018.29.1.04

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Akta Trybunału II instancji w Poznaniu, sygn. akt 54/16 W
Google Scholar

Bianchi P., La pubblicazione degli atti di causa can. 1598, Quaderni di diritto ecclesiale (12) 1999.
Google Scholar

Chacón R. R., La publicación de las actuaciones. Intervención de las partes y los abogados, Revista Española de Derecho Canonico (68) 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36576/summa.30702
Google Scholar

Conde A., Diritto processuale canonico, Roma 2006.
Google Scholar

Dec. c. Burke z dnia 21.06.1990 r. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.199004336
Google Scholar

Dec. c. Burke z dnia 15.11.1990, Studia Canonica (25) 1991.
Google Scholar

Dec. c. Erlebach z dnia 16.07.2015 r. Prot. N. 22.555, B. Bis 102/2015 – nieopublikowany.
Google Scholar

Dec. c. Erlebach, z dnia 26.06.2016 Prot. N. 22.406 B. Bis 55/16 – nieopublikowany.
Google Scholar

Dec. c. McKay z dnia 27.10.2007 r. B.103/07, w: Aa.Vv, L’istruttoria nel processo di nullità matrimoniale, Città del Vaticano 2014.
Google Scholar

Dec. c. Jaeger z dnia 23.03.2012 r. B. 41/12, w: Aa.Vv, L’istruttoria… dz. cyt.
Google Scholar

Erlebach G., La nullità della sentenza giudiziale „ob ius defensionis denegatum” nella giurisprudenza rotale, Città del Vaticano 1991.
Google Scholar

Greszata M., Komentarz do art. 270 DC, w: T. Rozkrut (red.) Komentarz do Instrukcji procesowej Dignitas Connubii, Sanomierz 2007.
Google Scholar

Gullo C., Gullo A., Prassi processuale nelle causa canoniche di nullità del matrimonio, Città del Vaticano 2009.
Google Scholar

Hilbert M., De publicatione actorum, Periodica (81) 1992.
Google Scholar

Llobell J., I processi matrimoniali nella Chiesa, Roma 2015.
Google Scholar

MendonÇa A., The Right of the Parties to Inspect the Acts and Its Relation to the Validity of a Definitive Sentence in a Marriage Nullity Process, Studia Canonica.
Google Scholar

Mingardi M., Conclusione e riapertura dell’istruttoria, w: Aa.Vv, L’istruttoria… dz. cyt.
Google Scholar

Moodie M., Fundamental Rights nad Access to the Acts of a Case, Studia Canonica (28) 1994.
Google Scholar

Pawluk T., Prawo Kanoniczne t. IV, Olsztyn 1990.
Google Scholar

Zuanazzi I., Lo ius ad probationes come espressione del diritto di difesa nel processo matrimoniale canonico, Ius Ecclesiae (11) 1999.
Google Scholar