Parafilia wyzwaniem dla małżeństwa kanonicznego

Kinga Szymańska

doi:10.21697/im.2020.31.1.02

Opublikowane: 2020-06-01

Tom 31 Nr 1 (2020)

Parafilia wyzwaniem dla małżeństwa kanonicznego

Kinga Szymańska

Ius Matrimoniale

Dział: Rozprawy i artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.1.02

Abstrakt

The considerations made in this article justify the conclusion that a paraphilic assesses the marriage from a selfish perspective, because everything he does is aimed at satisfying his pleasure. He does not consider the other person or the possibility of treating him objectively - in other words, a parafilik treats his partner as a thing to satisfy his selfish need for pleasure. Meanwhile, in the marriage relationship, closeness and realization of the good of the other party are sought as an equal partner. On the other hand, paraphilism, which is a sexual impulse, destroys not only the marriage but the spouse and, to a greater or lesser extent, the paraphilic himself. In a marriage with a paraphilic, there is no stability, no realization of the spouse's good, no realization of the community of life and love, only instinctive satisfaction, which is also unnatural. Nevertheless, regardless of the definition of paraphilia in medical sciences and psychology, when conducting a trial in an ecclesiastical court, it should be verified in the light of the concept of Christian anthropology, proper to canon studies. The paraphilia itself does not nullity it, it all depends on the severity of the disorder in question and its impact on the functioning in marriage.

Słowa kluczowe:

parafilia, zaburzenie parafilne, kanoniczne prawo małżeńskie, nieważność małżeństwa, proces małżeński

Pobierz pliki

pdf

Zasady cytowania

Szymańska, K. (2020). Parafilia wyzwaniem dla małżeństwa kanonicznego. Ius Matrimoniale, 31(1), 25–49. https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.1.02

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

I. Prawo kanoniczne
Google Scholar

1. Źródła systematyczne
Google Scholar

Codex Iuris Canonici auctoritate Joannis Pauli PP. II promulgatus–25.01.1983, AAS 75 (1983), pars II, s. 1-317.
Google Scholar

2. Opracowania
Google Scholar

Fuentes J. A., Desviaciones de la sexualidad. Parafilias y transsexualismo en las causas de nulidad matrimonial canonica, Ius Canonicum 53 (2013) nr 106, s. 655-690.
Google Scholar

II. Nauki medyczne
Google Scholar

1. Źródła
Google Scholar

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Mental Disorders, Washington DC 1952.
Google Scholar

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Washington DC 1968.
Google Scholar

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–III), Washington DC 1980.
Google Scholar

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Text Revision (DSM–IV-TR), Washington DC 2000.
Google Scholar

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), Washington DC – London 2013.
Google Scholar

International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10), t. 1, Geneva 2016.
Google Scholar

International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 11th Revision (ICD-11), https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http://id.who.int/icd/entity/2110604642 (Dostęp: 15.12.2019)
Google Scholar

2. Opracowania
Google Scholar

Abel G., Rouleau J., The nature and extent of sexual assault, w: Handbook of Sexual Assault: Issues, Theories and Treatment of the Offender, W.L. Marshall, D.R. Laws, H.E. Barbaree (red.), New York 1990, s. 9-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0915-2_2
Google Scholar

Aggrawal A., Forensic and Medico-legal Aspects of Sexual Crimes and Unusual Sexual Practices, New York 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420043099
Google Scholar

Aggrawal A., Paraphilias and Sexual Crimes-An Overview, w: Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science (Five Volume Set), A. Jamieson, A. Moenssens (red.), edycja online z 2016 r., s. 2, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470061589.fsa1023/pdf (dostęp: 12.01.2020).
Google Scholar

Beech A.R., Miner M.H., Thornton D., Paraphilias in the DSM-5, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 12 (2016) nr 1, s. 383-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093330
Google Scholar

Bradford J. M.W., Ahmed A.G., The natural history of paraphilia, Psychiatric Clinics of North America 37 (2014) nr 2, s. xi-xv. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2014.03.010
Google Scholar

Brockman B., Bluglass R., A general psychiatric approach to sexual deviation w: Sexual deviation, I. Rosen I (red.), Oxford-New York-Tokyo 1996, s. 1-42.
Google Scholar

Cierpiałkowska L., Psychopatologia, Warszawa 2014.
Google Scholar

Dora M., Mijas M., Dobroczyński B., Kryteria zaburzeń parafilnych w DSM-5 wobec asfiksji autoerotycznej i pozaseksualnej formy ograniczania dopływu tlenu, Psychiatria Polska 53 (2019) nr 5, s. 1103-1112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/78166
Google Scholar

Dunsieth N.W., Nelson E.B., Brusman-Lovins L.A, Holcomb J.L., Beckman D., Welge J.A., Roby D., Taylor Jr P., Soutullo C.A., McElroy S.L., Psychiatric and legal features of 113 men convicted of sexual offenses, Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 65 (2004) nr 3, s. 293-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.v65n0302
Google Scholar

Fedoroff J.P., Di Gioacchino L., Murphy L., Problems with paraphilias in the DSM-5, Current Psychiatry Report 15 (2013) nr 8, s. 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-013-0363-6
Google Scholar

Konrad N., Welke J., Optiz-Welke A., Paraphilias, Current Opinion in Psychiatry 28(2015) nr 6, s. 440-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000202
Google Scholar

Krawczyk P., Święcicki Ł., ICD-11 vs. ICD-10 – przegląd aktualizacji i nowości wprowadzonych w najnowszej wersji Międzynarodowej Klasyfikacji Chorób WHO, Psychiatria Polska 54 (2020) nr 1, s. 7-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/103876
Google Scholar

Krueger R.B., Reed G.M., First M.B., Marais A., Kismodi E., Briken P., Proposals for Paraphilic Disorders in the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Eleventh Revision (ICD-11), Archives of Sexual Behavior 46 (2017) nr 5, s. 1529-1545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-0944-2
Google Scholar

Lew-Starowicz Z., Seksuologia sądowa, Warszawa 2000.
Google Scholar

Mic A., Lew-Starowicz Z., Zaburzenia parafilne w ujęciu DSM-5, Przegląd seksuologiczny 10 (2014) z. 2, s. 16-24.
Google Scholar

Money J., Simcoe K.W., Acrotomophilia, Sex and Disability: New Concepts and Case Report, Sexuality and Disability 7 (1984) nr 1-2, s. 43-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01101829
Google Scholar

Pużyński S., Wciórka J. (red.), Klasyfikacje zaburzeń psychicznych i zaburzeń zachowania w ICD-10. Badawcze kryteria diagnostyczne, Kraków 1998.
Google Scholar

Rosenhan D.L., Seligman M E.P., Abnormal Psychology, New York 1984.
Google Scholar

Sadoff D.H., Other sexual deviations, w: The Sexual Experience, B.J. Sadock, H.I. Kaplan, A.M. Freedman (red.), Baltimore 1976.
Google Scholar

Seligman M.E.P., Walker E.F., Rosenhan D.L., Psychopatologia, Poznań 2003.
Google Scholar

Wiederman M W., Paraphilia and fetishism, The Family Journal 11 (2003) nr 3, s. 315-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480703252663
Google Scholar

Wilcox D., Sosnoski D., Warberg B., Beech A.R., Sexual history disclosure using the polygraph in a sample of British sex offenders in treatment, Polygraph Journal 34 (2005) nr 3, s. 171-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13552600410001667797
Google Scholar

Kinga Szymańska

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-3448

Afiliacja:

Sąd Metropolitalny Warszawski Polska

Biogram

Dr Kinga Szymańska – doktor nauk prawnych w zakresie prawa kanonicznego, prawnik, politolog religii. Notariusz i audytor w Sądzie Metropolitalnym Warszawskim. Autorka publikacji z zakresu małżeńskiego prawa kanonicznego, psychiatrii i psychologii.