Can GDPR and Copyright law stop deepfake? A comprehensive legal analysis of the deepfake phenomenon and liability for the deepfake in the polish legal system

Agata Wróbel

Опубликовано: 2024-10-29

№ 1 (2024)

Can GDPR and Copyright law stop deepfake? A comprehensive legal analysis of the deepfake phenomenon and liability for the deepfake in the polish legal system

Agata Wróbel

Аннотация

The article is a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between deepfake technology and identity issues in the context of the Polish legal system. In the context of the dynamic development of generative Artificial Intelligence systems, an important aspect is the protection of individuals' identities. This article focuses on two key areas: detection technology and the legal framework that balances freedom of speech with the protection of identity and information security. The first part of the article focuses on the role of detection technology in combating deepfake. Current trends and advances in the field of content manipulation are analyzed. The second important aspect addressed in the article is the analysis of the legal framework regulating deepfake in Poland. Criminal and civil liability issues related to the creation and dissemination of deepfake are discussed, with a particular focus on image protection and related copyright law an related rights. The relationship between creative freedom and the protection of individual identity is also analyzed, including through the lens of Polish case law. The last part of the article focuses on current developments in the European AI Act (status as of December 2023). It is indicated how the new AI regulations affect the issues of identity protection and combating deepfake.

Скачать файлы

PDF (Język Polski)

Правила цитирования

Wróbel, A. (2024). Can GDPR and Copyright law stop deepfake? A comprehensive legal analysis of the deepfake phenomenon and liability for the deepfake in the polish legal system. "Młody Jurysta" Czasopismo Studentów I Doktorantów Wydziału Prawa I Administracji UKSW, (1), 22–39. извлечено от https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/mj/article/view/14572

##plugins.themes.libcom.share##

Библиографические ссылки

A. Lach, Kradzież tożsamości, Prokuratura i Prawo 3, 2012, pp. 29–39.
Google Scholar

Matlak, Cywilnoprawna ochrona wizerunku, Kwartalnik Prawa Prywatnego 13(2), 2004, pp. 317–358.
Google Scholar

Ziobroń, Deepfake a prawo karne. Uwagi de lege lata i de lege ferenda dotyczące fałszywej pornografii, Studenckie Prace Prawnicze, Administratywistyczne i Ekonomiczne 37, 2021, pp. 225–238.
Google Scholar

A.M. Niżankowska, The Right to the Integrity of the Work, Warsaw 2007
Google Scholar

Blog of the Ideas NCBR, 2024. Accessed: 20.09.2024, https://ideas-ncbr.pl/jakupewnic-sie-ze-rozmawialismy-online-z-prawdziwa-osobanaukowcy-z-ideas-ncbropracowali-prototypowe-rozwiazanie/
Google Scholar

BuzzFeedVideo, You Won’t Believe What Obama Says In This Video!, 2018. Accessed 29.12.2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQ54GDm1eL0
Google Scholar

Channel 4 Entertainment, Deepfake Queen: 2020 Alternative Christmas Message, 2020. Accessed 29.12.2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IvY-Abd2FfM
Google Scholar

D. Shelton, Capturing The Last of Us: Motion Capture Pipeline, 2015. Accessed 29.12.2023, https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1021854/Capturing-The-Last-of-Us
Google Scholar

R.A. Delfino, Pornographic Deepfakes: The Case for Federal Criminalization of Revenge Porn’s Next Tragic Act, Fordham Law Review 88(3), 2019, pp. 886–938)
Google Scholar

DiepNep, This is not Morgan Freeman - A Deepfake Singularity, 2021. Accessed
Google Scholar

12.2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxXpB9pSETo&t=1s
Google Scholar

E. Ferenc-Szydełko, Ustawa o prawie autorskim i prawach pokrewnych. Komentarz, Warsaw 2021
Google Scholar

E. Szych, The construction of posthumous substitution of the author in the light of copyright law, ZNUJ. PPWI, No. 2, 2024, pp. 89-105.
Google Scholar

I. Zgoliński, Commentary on Article 216, [in:] V. Konarska-Wrzosek (ed.) Kodeks karny. Komentarz, Warsaw 2021, pp.1146–1150.
Google Scholar

J. Barta, M. Czajkowska-Dąbrowska, Z. Ćwiąkalski, R. Markiewicz, E. Traple, Prawo autorskie i prawa pokrewne Komentarz, Wolters Kluwer, 2011.
Google Scholar

J. Kluza, Insult in Polish Penal Law. Crime of Art. 216 of the Polish Penal Code in the Perspective of the Functioning of the Judiciary with a Particular Regard to Case Law, Studenckie Zeszyty Naukowe 20(35), 2017, pp. 60–70.
Google Scholar

J. Sieńczyło-Chlabicz, Prawo do wizerunku a komercjalizacja dóbr osobistych, 2007,
Google Scholar

PiP, no. 6, pp. 19-34.
Google Scholar

J. Wilpon, T. Thomson, S. Bangalore, P. Haffner, M. Johnston, Interactions LLC, Fundamentals of Machine Learning, whitepaper. Accessed: 20.09.2024, https://www.interactions.com/resources/technology/fundamentals-machine-learning/.
Google Scholar

K. Rainko, A. Sikora, Wizerunek w świetle prawa cywilnego a ochrona danych osobowych [in:] Ochrona danych osobowych w prawie publicznym, ed. M. Jędrzejczak, Warsaw 2021, pp. 161-174.
Google Scholar

K. Szpyt, Sztuczna inteligencja i nowe technologie (nie zawsze) w służbie ludzkości, czyli cywilnoprawna problematyka rozwoju i popularyzacji technologii deepfake, [in:] K. Flaga-Gieruszyńska (ed.), Sztuczna inteligencja, blockchain, cyberbezpieczeństwo oraz dane osobowe. Zagadnienia wybrane, Warsaw 2019, pp. 75–94.
Google Scholar

M. Modrzejewska, Podobieństwo awatarów do znanych osób żyjących [in:] Verba volant, scripta manet. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Pani Profesor Bogusławie Gneli, ed. A. Kaźmierczyk, K. Michałowska, M. Szaraniec, Warsaw 2023, pp. 721-731.
Google Scholar

M. Sewastianowicz, Deepfake - ofiara realistycznej przeróbki może mieć problem z dochodzeniem swoich praw, 2023. Accessed 29.12.2023, www.prawo.pl
Google Scholar

M. Skwarzyński, Podmiotowe granice wolności słowa w wypowiedziach publicznych, Law in Action, Civil Cases, vol. 48, 2021, pp. 261–271.
Google Scholar

M.L. Joshi, Deepfake: A Systematic Review, Kalyan Bharati, No. 0976-0822, 2022, UGC-CARE List Group I (73-74)
Google Scholar

N. Bochyńska, Klonowanie głosu. Fałszywe próbki mogą oszukać systemy uwierzytelniania, CyberDefence24.pl, 2023. Accessed: 20.09.2024, https://cyberdefence24.pl/cyberbezpieczenstwo/klonowanie-glosu-falszywe-probkimoga-oszukac-systemy-uwierzytelniania
Google Scholar

O. Bodanka, Image violation with the use of deepfake technology – a legal and practical analysis, Opolskie Studia Administracyjno-Prawne 20(1), 2022, pp. 11–32.
Google Scholar

PlayStation Australia, The Last of Us Part I. Motion Capture Trailer, 2022. Accessed
Google Scholar

12.2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Wd0P5WnO9Q
Google Scholar

Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain union legislative acts. Accessed: 29.12.2023, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52021PC0206
Google Scholar

S. Haysom, People are using face-swapping tech to add Nicolas Cage to random movies and what is 2018, 2018. Accessed 29.12.2023, https://mashable.com/article/nicolascage-face-swapping-deepfakes
Google Scholar

S. Wieczorek, M. Kubiak, Ryzyka i szanse wynikające z rozwoju nowych technologii w branży mediowej na przykładzie zjawiska deep fake – analiza prawna, Monitor Prawniczy 21, 2019, pp. 101–107.
Google Scholar

V. G. Garcia, Deep fake – postęp technologiczny a prawo karne, Acta Iuridica Resoviensia, 44(126), 2024, pp. 39–53.
Google Scholar

X. Mingchuan Long, M. Zha, An Overview of Generative Adversarial Networks, Journal of Computing and Electronic Information Management, 10(3), 2023, pp. 31-36.
Google Scholar