The Use of Force and Self-determination: Parsing Indeterminacy

Craig Forcese

doi:10.21697/2024.13.2.02

Published: 2025-02-27

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024)

The Use of Force and Self-determination: Parsing Indeterminacy

Craig Forcese

Polish Review of International and European Law

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/2024.13.2.02

Abstract

Hersch Lauterpacht observed in 1952 that “if international law is, in some ways, at the vanishing point of law, the law of war is, perhaps even more conspicuously, at the vanishing point of international law.”[1] More than 70 years later, Lauterpatch’s observation overstates the indefiniteness of modern international humanitarian law – the jus in bello or law of armed conflict governing the means and methods of armed conflict. However, it remains a fair critique of the jus ad bellum – the law that addresses the “rightness” of a recourse to force. Even more pointed would be a codicil, addressing the relationship between this jus ad bellum and the right of self-determination: The vanishing point at the vanishing point of international law is the relationship between the regulation of force and the right to self-determination. At this convergence point, two challenging questions of high politics intertwine to compound the indeterminacy of the law. The result is an area fertilized with opinions but hobbled with uncertainty. This fact is not accidental. States have little incentive to lay a roadmap for their lawful forcible dismemberment. Still, it may be possible to tease from the accrual of state practice answers to some questions in this area if factual scenarios are carefully parsed.

Keywords:

Self-determination, use of force, national liberation movements, internal conflicts, external intervention

Download files

Citation rules

Forcese, C. (2025). The Use of Force and Self-determination: Parsing Indeterminacy. Polish Review of International and European Law, 13(2), 43–80. https://doi.org/10.21697/2024.13.2.02

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2010, p. 403.
Google Scholar

Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Judgment, ICJ Reports 2005, p. 168.
Google Scholar

Bannelier, Karine, and Theodore Christakis. “The Intervention of France and Others in Mali.” In The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach, edited by Tom Ruys, Olivier Corten, and Alexandra Hofer, 809-834. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Case Concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), ICJ Reports 1986, p. 14.
Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio. Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
Google Scholar

Corten, Olivier. The Law Against War: The Prohibition on the Use of Force in Contemporary International Law. 2nd ed. Hart Publishing, 2021.
Google Scholar

Cristescu, Aureliu. Special Rapporteur of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities. The right to self-determination: historical and current development on the basis of United Nations instruments: study. UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/404/Rev.1, 1981.
Google Scholar

Denmark. Military Manual on International Law Relevant to the Danish Armed Forces in International Operations. 2020.
Google Scholar

East Timor (Portugal v. Australia), Judgment, ICJ Reports 1995, p. 102.
Google Scholar

EU Independent International Fact-finding Mission on the Conflict in Georgia. 2009.
Google Scholar

Fisch, J. The Right of Self-Determination of Peoples: The Domestication of an Illusion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Google Scholar

Fox, Gregory. “The Vietnamese Intervention in Cambodia – 1978.” In The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach, edited by Tom Ruys, Olivier Corten, and Alexandra Hofer, 231-260. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Geneva Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of August 12, 1949, United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 75, p. 287.
Google Scholar

Gray, Christine. International Law and the Use of Force. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Higgins, Noelle. Regulating the use of force in wars of national liberation: the need for a new regime: a study of the South Moluccas and Aceh. Brill, 2010.
Google Scholar

Heinze, Eric A. "International Law, Self-Defense, and the Israel-Hamas Conflict," Parameters 54, no. 1 (2024).
Google Scholar

Institute of International Law. The Principle of Non-Intervention in Civil Wars. 1975.
Google Scholar

International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Rules of Customary International Humanitarian Law. 2005.
Google Scholar

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171.
Google Scholar

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 993, p. 3.
Google Scholar

ILC, Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. Supplement No. 10 (A/56/10), chp.IV.E.1, November 2001.
Google Scholar

Keller, Helen. “Friendly Relations Declaration (1970).” Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law. 2021.
Google Scholar

Kritsiotis, Dino. “The Indian Intervention into (East) Pakistan.” In The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach, edited by Tom Ruys, Olivier Corten, and Alexandra Hofer, 165-190. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Lauterpacht, H. “The Problem of the Revision of the Law of War.” British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 29, 1952, 360-382.
Google Scholar

Legal Consequences Arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, ICJ, 2024 19 July, General List No. 186.
Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2004, p. 136.
Google Scholar

Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 2019 (I), p. 139.
Google Scholar

Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Advisory Opinion, 1.C.J. Reports 1996, p. 226.
Google Scholar

Lepard, Brian. Customary International Law: A new theory with practical applications. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Google Scholar

Lieblich, Eliav. International Law and Civil Wars. Routledge, 2013.
Google Scholar

Lieblich, Eliav. “The Soviet Intervention in Hungary – 1956.” In The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach, edited by Tom Ruys, Olivier Corten, and Alexandra Hofer, 43-68. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Mačák, Kubo. Internationalized Armed Conflicts in International Law. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko. “Does Israel have a right to defend itself?” EJIL: Talk!, November 14, 2023.
Google Scholar

Miliani, Alexandre. “How does the (il)legality of the Israeli occupation inform and is informed by the doctrine of self-defence?” Blog Droit International Pénal, February 22, 2024.
Google Scholar

Moore, John Norton, ed. The Virginia-Georgetown Manual Concerning the Use of Force Under International Law: Rules and Commentaries on Jus ad Bellum. West Point Press, 2024.
Google Scholar

Nolte, Georg, and Janina Barkholt. “The Sovet Intervention in Afghanistan – 1979-80.” In The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach, edited by Tom Ruys, Olivier Corten, and Alexandra Hofer, 281-310. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

O’Connell, Mary Ellen. “The Crisis in Ukraine – 2014.” In The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach, edited by Tom Ruys, Olivier Corten, and Alexandra Hofer, 835-872. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 1125, p. 3.
Google Scholar

Protocol (II) additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the protection of victims of non-international armed conflicts, United Nations Treaty Series, vol., p. 609.
Google Scholar

Reference re Secession of Quebec, 2 SCR 217.
Google Scholar

Ruys, Tom. “The Indian Intervention in Goa – 1961.” In The Use of Force in International Law: A Case-Based Approach, edited by Tom Ruys, Olivier Corten, and Alexandra Hofer, 85-102. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Google Scholar

Shany, Yuval and Amichai Cohen. “International Law ‘Made in Israel’ v. International Law ‘Made for Israel’.” Articles of War, November 22, 2023.
Google Scholar

Summers, J. Peoples and International Law. Brill, 2014.
Google Scholar

Thürer, Daniel, and Thomas Burri. “Self-Determination.” Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law. 2008.
Google Scholar

Thürer, Daniel, and Thomas Burri. “Secession.” Max Planck Encyclopedia of International Law. 2009.
Google Scholar

Tsagourias, Nicholas. “Israel’s Right to Self-Defence Against Hamas.” Articles of War, December 1, 2023.
Google Scholar

Ulfstein, Geir. “Does Israel have the right to self-defence – and what are the restrictions?” EJIL: Talk!, May 8, 2024.
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. "Aggression against Ukraine," A/RES/ES-11/1 (2022).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. “Declaration on the Inadmissibility of Intervention”. A/RES/36/103 (1981).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. “Furtherance of remedy and reparation for aggression against Ukraine,” A/RES/ES-11/5 (2022).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. “Importance of the universal realization of the right of peoples to self-determination and of the speedy granting of independence to colonial countries and peoples for the effective guarantee and observance of human rights”. A/RES/3070 (XXVIII) (1973).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. “Principles of the Charter of the United Nations underlying a comprehensive, just and lasting peace in Ukraine,” A/RES/ES-11/6 (2023).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. “Territorial integrity of Ukraine: defending the principles of the Charter of the United Nations,” A/RES/ED-11/4 (2022).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/1514 (XV) (1960).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/1541 (XV) (1960).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/2022 (XX) (1965).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/2074 (XX) (1965).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/2105 (XX) (1965).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/2107 (XX) (1965).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/2131 (XX) (1965).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/2160 (XXI) (1966).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/2184 (XXI) (1966).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/2189(XXI) (1966).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/2625 (XXV) (1970).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/3314 (1974).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/34/92G (1979).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/35/33 (1980).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/36/9 (1981).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/37/43 (1982).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/38/17 (1983).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/38/36 (1983).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/39/17 (1984).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/40/25 (1985).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/41/101 (1986).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/42/95 (1987).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/43/106 (1988).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/44/79 (1989).
Google Scholar

UN General Assembly. A/RES/45/130 (1990).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. S/RES/312 (1972).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. S/RES/322 (1972).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. S/RES/326 (1973).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. S/RES/376 (1976).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. S/RES/424 (1978).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. S/RES/447 (1979).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. S/RES/556 (1984).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. S/RES/557 (1984).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. S/RES/661 (1990).
Google Scholar

UN Security Council. Report of the Security Council to the General Assembly, Covering the period from 16 July 1956 to 15 July 1957, Supplement No. 2 (A/3648).
Google Scholar

UN Doc S/PV.746 (1956).
Google Scholar

UN Doc S/PV.987 (1961).
Google Scholar

UN Doc S/PV.988 (1961).
Google Scholar

UN Doc S/PV.1441 (1968).
Google Scholar

UN Doc S/PV.2932 (1990).
Google Scholar

Whelan, Anthony. “Wilsonian Self-Determination and the Versailles Settlement.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 43, no. 1 (1994): 99-101.
Google Scholar

Wilde, Ralph. “Israel’s War in Gaza is not a valid act of self-defence in international law.” Opinio Juris, November 9, 2023.
Google Scholar

Wilson, Heather. International Law and the Use of Force by National Liberation Movements. Oxford University Press, 1988.
Google Scholar

Yau, Dean Shun Ming. “The Legality of the Use of Force for Self-Determination.” The Palestine Yearbook of International Law 21 (2020): 32-70.
Google Scholar