Legal Form of Self-Determination in International Law

Przemysław Tacik

doi:10.21697/2024.13.2.01

Published: 2025-02-27

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024)

Legal Form of Self-Determination in International Law

Przemysław Tacik

Polish Review of International and European Law

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/2024.13.2.01

Abstract

The paper aims to address the right of peoples to self-determination through one of the perspectives of critical legal thinking, namely the concept of the legal form. The theory of the legal form remains one of the most productive paradigms within Marxist approaches to the law. A hundred years since it was proposed in 2024 by Evgeny Pashukanis, it can be creatively developed to grasp paradoxes of self-determination. China Miéville’s influential proposal opens some avenues, but they require further deepening. As the paper demonstrates, three dimensions encompassed within the tradition of the legal form can be applied to self-determination. First, the understanding of the legal subject as imposed through procedures of interpellation. The right to self-determination contains, as its foreground, a set of ideologemes aimed at offering a people’s identity. Communities which ‘recognise’ their ‘selves’ in this interpellation can become legal subjects of self-determination. At the same time, national identity is welded with imagery of sovereignty and statal expression. Second, the concept of the legal form allows of grasping the process of exchange of recognition which develops through the right of self-determination. This process is based on internal inequality, as peoples are structurally divided between statal and non-statal ones. The right to self-determination, although posited as mediating between these two, effectively freezes its non-statal subjects before the gate to the community of states. Third, the right to self-determination demonstrates a high level of singularity in international law. Singularity is expounded as what perturbs the relations between the universal and the particular, the rule and its cases. Especially after the era of decolonisation instances in which self-determination is invoked do not form a graspable chain of cases. Instead, singularity of this right appears in its suspended applicability and practical non-enforceability.

Keywords:

self-determination, critical legal theory, legal form, Evgeny Pashukanis, peoples in international law

Download files

Citation rules

Tacik, P. (2025). Legal Form of Self-Determination in International Law. Polish Review of International and European Law, 13(2), 9–42. https://doi.org/10.21697/2024.13.2.01

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Althusser, Louis. Sur la reproduction. Paris: PUF, 1995.
Google Scholar

Althusser, Louis. “Trois notes sur la théorie des discours.” In Écrits sur la psychanalyse. Freud et Lacan, 111-170. Paris: STOCK/IMEC, 1993.
Google Scholar

Amann, Diane Marie. “Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965.” American Journal of International Law 113, no. 4 (2019): 784.
Google Scholar

Anaya, S. James. “Indigenous Rights Norms in Contemporary International Law.” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 8, no. 2 (1991): 1.
Google Scholar

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London & New York: Verso, 2006.
Google Scholar

Anderson, Nancy E., and David F. Greenberg. “From Substance to Form: The Legal Theories of Pashukanis and Edelman.” Social Text 7 (1983): 69–84.
Google Scholar

Berman, Nathaniel. “Sovereignty in Abeyance: Self-Determination and International Law.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 7, no. 1 (1988): 51.
Google Scholar

Bianchi, Andrea. International Law Theories: An Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking. Oxford: OUP, 2016.
Google Scholar

Blanke, Hermann-Josef, and Yasser Abdelrehim. “Catalonia and the Right of Self-Determination from the Perspective of International Law.” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 18 (2014): 532-564.
Google Scholar

Bossacoma Busquets, Pau. Morality and Legality of Secession: A Theory of National Self-Determination. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020.
Google Scholar

Brilmayer, Lea. “Secession and the Two Types of Territorial Claims.” ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law 21, no. 2 (2015).
Google Scholar

Brophy, Susan Dianne. “An Uneven and Combined Development Theory of Law: Initiation.” Law & Critique 28, no. 2 (2017): 167.
Google Scholar

Busquets, Pau Puig I. “Exercising Self-Determination without Jeopardising the Rights of the Others: The Catalan Model.” St. Thomas Law Review 14 (2001): 395.
Google Scholar

Cass, Deborah Z. “Re-Thinking Self-Determination: A Critical Analysis of Current International Law Theories.” Syracuse Journal of International Law & Commerce 18, no. 1 (1992): 21.
Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio. Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal. Cambridge: CUP, 1995.
Google Scholar

Castellino, Joshua. International Law and Self-Determination: The Interplay of the Politics of Territorial Possession with Formulations of Post-Colonial ‘National’ Identity. Leiden & Boston: Nijhoff, 2000.
Google Scholar

Cátala, Amandine. “Remedial Theories of Secession and Territorial Justification.” Journal of Social Philosophy 44, no. 1 (2013).
Google Scholar

Chia, Eduardo A. “On the ‘Relative’ Autonomy of the Modern Form of Law: From Marx and Engels to Althusser.” In Legal Form and the End of the Law, 119-148.
Google Scholar

Christakis, Théodore. Le droit à l’autodétermination en dehors des situations de décolonisation. Paris: La documentation française, 1999.
Google Scholar

Cohen, G. A. “Base and Superstructure: A Reply to Hugh Collins.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 9, no. 1 (1989): 95.
Google Scholar

Cobban, Alfred. The Nation State and National Self-Determination. London & Glasgow: Collins, 1969.
Google Scholar

Coleman, Andrew K. Resolving Claims to Self-Determination: Is There a Role for the International Court of Justice? Abingdon & New York: Routledge, 2013.
Google Scholar

Collins, Hugh. Marxism and Law. Oxford: OUP, 1982.
Google Scholar

Crawford, James. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: OUP, 2006.
Google Scholar

Czapliński, Władysław. “Recognition and non-recognition beyond the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion”. In Questions de droit international autour de l’avis consultatif de la Cour internationale de justice sur le Kosovo, edited by Maurizio Arcari and Louis Balmond, 173-190. Milano: Giuffrè 2011.
Google Scholar

Demissie, Derege. “Self-Determination Including Secession vs. the Territorial Integrity of Nation-States: A Prima Facie Case for Secession.” Suffolk Transnational Law Review 20 (1996): 165.
Google Scholar

Driest, Simone F. van den. “Crimea’s Separation from Ukraine: An Analysis of the Right to Self-Determination and (Remedial) Secession in International Law.” Netherlands International Law Review 62 (2015): 329.
Google Scholar

Eisner, Michael. “A Procedural Model for the Resolution of Secessionist Disputes.” Harvard International Law Journal 33, no. 2 (1992): 407.
Google Scholar

Espiell, Hector Gros. The Right to Self-Determination. Implementation of United Nations Resolutions. (1980) ElCN.4/Sub.2/405/Rev.l, 22.
Google Scholar

Fisch, Jörg. “Adolf Hitler und das Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Völker.“ Historische Zeitschrift 290, no. 1 (2010): 93.
Google Scholar

Fisch, Jörg. The Right of Self-Determination of Peoples: The Domestication of an Illusion. Translated by Anita Mage. Cambridge: CUP, 2015.
Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–78. Translated by Graham Burchell. London: Picador, 2009.
Google Scholar

Peter Hilpold (ed.), Kosovo and International Law. The ICJ Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010, Leiden & Boston: Nijhoff 2012
Google Scholar

Michael Head, Evgeny Pashukanis. A Critical Reappraisal, London & New York: Routledge 2016
Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg W. F. Philosophy of Right. Translated by R. W. Dyde. Kitchener, ON: Batoche Books, 2001.
Google Scholar

Hegel, Georg W. F. The Science of Logic. Translated by G. de Giovanni. Cambridge: CUP, 2010.
Google Scholar

Hilpold, Peter, ed. Kosovo and International Law: The ICJ Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010. Leiden & Boston: Nijhoff, 2012.
Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric. Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: CUP, 1991.
Google Scholar

Hofbauer, Jane A. Sovereignty in the Exercise of the Right to Self-Determination. Leiden & Boston: Brill Nijhoff, 2016.
Google Scholar

Ibhawoh, Bonny. “Seeking the Political Kingdom: Universal Human Rights and the Anti-Colonial Movement in Africa.” In Decolonization, Self-Determination and the Rise of Global Human Rights Politics, edited by A. Dirk Moses, Marco Duranti, and Roland Burke, 35-53. Cambridge: CUP, 2020.
Google Scholar

Kennedy, Duncan. A Critique of Adjudication (fin de siècle). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
Google Scholar

Kelsen, Hans. Principles of International Law. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1966.
Google Scholar

Kinsey, Richard. “Marxism and the Law: Preliminary Analyses.” British Journal of Law and Society 5, no. 2 (1978): 202.
Google Scholar

Kivotidis, Dimitrios. “The Withering Away of the Legal Form: Revisiting Past Debates for Future Movements.” In Legal Form and the End of Law: Pashukanis’s Legacy, edited by Cosmin Cercel, Gian-Giacomo Fusco, and Przemysław Tacik, 234-257. London & New York: Routledge, 2025.
Google Scholar

Klare, Karl. “Law-Making as Praxis.” Telos 40 (1979): 123.
Google Scholar

Knop, Karen. Diversity and Self-Determination in International Law. Cambridge: CUP, 2002.
Google Scholar

Knox, Robert. “Marxism, International Law, and Political Strategy.” Leiden Journal of International Law 22, no. 3 (2009): 413-436.
Google Scholar

Liu, Han. “Two Faces of Self-Determination in Political Divorce.” ICL Journal 10, no. 4 (2016): 355.
Google Scholar

Lodgman von Auen, Rudolf. “Das Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Völker.” Donauraum 3 (1958): 198.
Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. Translated by Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin, 1976.
Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. Critique of Hegel’s “Philosophy of Right”. Cambridge: CUP, 1971.
Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. “Debates on the Law on the Theft of Wood.” In Collected Works, Vol. 1, by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, 224–263. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1975.
Google Scholar

Marx, Karl. The Critique of the Gotha Programme. In Collected Works, Vol. 24, 75-99. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 2010.
Google Scholar

Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. “Manifesto of the Communist Party.” In Selected Works, Vol. 1, 98-137. Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969.
Google Scholar

Miéville, China. Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2005.
Google Scholar

Moltchanova, Anna. National Self-Determination and Justice in Multinational States. Berlin: Springer, 2009.
Google Scholar

Nichelmann, Rolf, and Alexander Paquée. “Schutz nationaler Minderheiten und das Prinzip der Selbstbestimmung der Völker: Zeitbindung durch Recht oder Risiko?” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 28 (2007): 49.
Google Scholar

Oklopcic, Zoran. “Populus Interruptus: Self-Determination, the Independence of Kosovo, and the Vocabulary of Peoplehood.” Leiden Journal of International Law 22, no. 4 (2009): 677.
Google Scholar

Пашуканис, Евгений Брониславович. Общая теория права и марксизм in Избранные произведения по общей теории права и государства. Mocкba: Наука 1980, 32-181. English translation: Pashukanis, Evgeny. The General Theory of Law & Marxism. Transl. Barbara Einhorn. New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers 2002.
Google Scholar

Perkowski, Maciej. Samostanowienie narodów w prawie międzynarodowym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Prawnicze PWN, 2001.
Google Scholar

Peters, Anne. “The Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris: How Relevant is it for Issues of Secession?” In Self-Determination and Secession in International Law, edited by Christian Walter, Antje von Ungern-Sternberg, and Kavus Abushov, 121-137. Oxford: OUP, 2014.
Google Scholar

Pomerance, Michla. Self-Determination in Law and Practice: The New Doctrine in the United States. Leiden: Nijhoff, 1982.
Google Scholar

Rabl, Kurt. Das Selbstbestimmungsrecht der Völker. Wien: Böhlau, 1973.
Google Scholar

de la Rasilla, Ignacio. International Law and History. Modern Interfaces. Cambridge: CUP 2022.
Google Scholar

Roshwald, Aviel. “The Post-1989 Era as Heyday of the Nation-State?” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 24 (2011): 11.
Google Scholar

Sanz de Hoyos, Carloz. El derecho de autodeterminación: Constitución y normas internacionales. Cizur Menor: Aranzadi, 2017.
Google Scholar

Scotoni, Pau Puig I. “Exercising Self-Determination without Jeopardising the Rights of the Others: The Catalan Model.” St Thomas Law Review 14 (2001).
Google Scholar

Senaratne, Kalana. Internal Self-Determination in International Law: History, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP, 2021.
Google Scholar

Senaratne, Kalana. “Beyond the Internal/External Dichotomy of the Principle of Self-Determination.” Hong Kong Law Journal 43, no. 1 (2013): 463.
Google Scholar

Stankovski, Boshko. “Implications of Kosovo Independence for the Doctrine of Constitutional Self-Determination.” European Yearbook of Minority Issues 10 (2011): 91.
Google Scholar

Stone, Alan. “The Place of Law in the Marxian Structure-Superstructure Archetype.” Law and Society Review 19, no. 1 (1985), 48-56.
Google Scholar

Summers, James. Peoples and International Law. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2014.
Google Scholar

Tacik, Przemysław. Deconstructing Self-Determination in International Law: Sovereignty, Exception, Biopolitics. Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2023.
Google Scholar

Thürer, Daniel. Das Selbstbestimmung der Völker: Mit einem Exkurs zur Jurafrage. Bern: Stämpfli & Cie, 1976.
Google Scholar

Trinidad, Jamie. Self-Determination in Disputed Colonial Territories. Cambridge: CUP, 2018.
Google Scholar

Tzouvala, Ntina. Capitalism as Civilization: A History of International Law. Cambridge: CUP, 2020.
Google Scholar

Velasco, Zoilo A. “Self-Determination and Secession: Human Rights-based Conflict Resolution.” International and Comparative Law Review 16, no. 1 (2014): 75.
Google Scholar

Weller, Marc. Escaping the Self-Determination Trap. Leiden & Boston: Nijhoff, 2008.
Google Scholar

Weller, Marc. “Settling Self-Determination Conflicts: Recent Developments.” European Journal of International Law 20, no. 1 (2009): 111.
Google Scholar

Wilson, Jerome. “Ethnic Groups and the Right to Self-Determination.” Connecticut Journal of International Law 11 (1996): 433.
Google Scholar