G. Anagnostaras, Balancing Conflicting Fundamental Rights: The Sky Österreich paradigm, ‘European Law Review’ 2014, vol. 39, no 1
Google Scholar

A. Andreangeli, Ne bis in idem and Administrative Sanctions: Bonda, ‘Common Market Law Review’ 2013, vol. 50, no 6
Google Scholar

T. Ballarino, Lineamenti di diritto comunitario, Cedam, Padova, 1990
Google Scholar

B. Van Bockel, Sanctions for EU Agricultural Subsidies Fraud in the Light of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, ‘European State Aid Law Quarterly’ 2013, vol. 12, no 2
Google Scholar

M. Böse, The Principle of Proportionality and the Protection of Legal Interest, ‘European Criminal Law Review’ 2011, vol. 1, no 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/219174411798862695
Google Scholar

G. De Búrca, After the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: The Court of Justice as a Human Rights Adjudicator?, ‘Maastricht Journal of European and
Google Scholar

Comparative Law’ 2013, vol. 20, no 2
Google Scholar

G. De Búrca, The EU, the European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi, ‘Harvard International Law Journal’ 2009, vol. 51, no 1
Google Scholar

E. Cannizzaro, Il principio della proporzionalità nell’ordinamento internazionale, Giuffrè editore, Milano, 2000
Google Scholar

S. Van Drooghenbroeck, La proportionnalité dans le droit de la convention européenne des droits de l’homme, Bruylant, Bruxelles, 2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pusl.20931
Google Scholar

E. Ellyis (ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe, Hart Publishing, Oxford – Portland, 1999
Google Scholar

N. Emiliou, The Principle of Proportionality in European Law. A Comparative Analysis, Kluwer Law International, London, 1996
Google Scholar

E. Herlin-Karnell, The Constitutional Dimension of European Criminal Law, Hart Publishing, Oxford – Portland, 2012
Google Scholar

J. Kokott, C. Sobotta, The Kadi Case – Constitutional Core Values and International Law – Finding the Balance?, ‘European Journal of International Law’ 2012, vol. 23, no 4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs063
Google Scholar

K. Lenaerts, Exploring the Limits of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, ‘European Constitutional Law Review’ 2012, vol. 8, no 3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019612000260
Google Scholar

A.M. Maugeri, Il principio di proporzione nelle scelte punitive del legislatore europeo: l’alternativa delle sanzioni amministrative, [in:] G. Grasso, R. Sicurella (eds.), ‘L’evoluzione del diritto penale nei settori d’interesse europeo alla luce del Trattato di Lisbona’, Giuffrè editore, Milano, 2011
Google Scholar

T. Ostropolski, The Principle of Proportionality under the European Arrest Warrant – with an Excursus on Poland, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2014, vol. 5, no 2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441400500204
Google Scholar

G. Palmisano (ed.), Making the Charter of Fundamental Rights a Living Instruments, Brill Nijhoff, Leiden – Boston, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291850
Google Scholar

S. Peers, T. Hervey, J. Kenner, A. Ward (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary, Hart Publishing, Oxford – Portland, 2014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845259055
Google Scholar

A. Pliakos, G. Anagnostaras, Who is the Ultimate Arbiter? The Battle Over Judicial Supremacy in Europe, ‘European Law Review’ 2011, vol. 36, no 1
Google Scholar

F. Pizzetti, G. Tiberi, Le competenze dell’Unione e il principio di sussidiarietà, [in:] F. Bassanini, G. Tiberi (eds.), ‘Le nuove istituzioni europee. Commento al
Google Scholar

Trattato di Lisbona, il Mulino, Bologna, 2010
Google Scholar

A. Steinbach, The Lisbon Judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court – New Guidance on the Limits of European Integration?, ‘German Law Journal’ 2010, vol. 11, no 4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200018587
Google Scholar

M. Szwarc, Application of the Charter of Fundamental Rights in the Context of Sanctions Imposed by Member States for Infringements of EU Law: Comment on Fransson Case, ‘European Public Law’ 2014, vol. 20, no 2
Google Scholar

D. Thym, In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon Judgment of the German Constitutional Court, ‘Common Market Law Review’ 2009, vol. 46, no 6
Google Scholar

C. Tomuschat, The Kadi case: What Relationship is there between the Universal Legal Order under the Auspices of the United Nations and the EU Legal Order?, ‘Yearbook of European Law’, vol. 28, no 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/28.1.654
Google Scholar

H. Tor Inge, The Function of the Proportionality Principle in EU Law, ‘European Law Journal’ 2010, vol. 16, no 2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2009.00502.x
Google Scholar

T. Tridimas, The General Principles of EU Law, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007
Google Scholar

S. de Vries, U. Bernitz, S. Weatherill (eds.), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights as a Binding Instrument: Five Years Old and Growing, Hart Publishing, Oxford – Portland, 2015
Google Scholar

E. Xanthopoulou, The Quest for Proportionality for the European Arrest Warrant: Fundamental Rights Protection in a Mutual Recognition Environment, ‘New Journal of European Criminal Law’ 2015, vol. 6, no 1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441500600104
Google Scholar

J. Ziller, The German Constitutional Court’s Friendliness towards European Law: On the Judgment of Bundesverfassungsgericht over the Ratification of the Treaty of Lisbon, ‘European Public Law’ 2010, vol. 16, no 1
Google Scholar