Mapping position of states on the application of sovereignty in cyberspace

Łukasz Kułaga

doi:10.21697/2024.13.1.03

Opublikowane: 2024-07-31

Tom 13 Nr 1 (2024)

Mapping position of states on the application of sovereignty in cyberspace

Łukasz Kułaga

Polish Review of International and European Law

Dział: Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/2024.13.1.03

Abstrakt

The article analyses the views of states on application of sovereignty in cyberspace taking into account rising number of states’ individual and collective positions in this respect. It identifies three major models of sovereignty: sovereignty as an international authority, sovereignty as only a principle and sovereignty as not only a principle. Against this background it aims at explaining the rule-principle dichotomy and consequences of its application. Finally it distinguish converging components concerning the application of sovereignty in cyberspace. Such an exercise  allows for delimiting the scope of application sovereignty as a rule in cyberspace vis-à-vis other norms of general international law

Słowa kluczowe:

sovereignty, non-intervention, cyberspace , principle-rule distinction

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Kułaga, Łukasz. (2024). Mapping position of states on the application of sovereignty in cyberspace . Polish Review of International and European Law, 13(1), 65–88. https://doi.org/10.21697/2024.13.1.03

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Prakash, Anand Ram. Sovereign Equality of States in International Law. RCADI 1986.
Google Scholar

Perry, Barlow John. “A declaration of the independence of cyberspace”, 1996, https://www.eff.org/cyberspaceindependence .
Google Scholar

Besson, Samantha. “Sovereignty.” In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law online.
Google Scholar

Bodin, Jean. On Sovereignty On Sovereignty: Six Books Of The Commonwealth. Cambridge, 1992.
Google Scholar

Broeders, Dennis (eds.). Digital Sovereignty: From Narrative to Policy? EU Cyber Direct 2022.
Google Scholar

Broeders, Dennis. “Coalition of the unwilling? Chinese and Russian perspectives on cyberspace.” The Hague Program For Cyber Norms Policy Brief, November 2019.
Google Scholar

Broeders. Dennis (eds.). Governing Cyberspace: Behavior, Power, and Diplomacy. Digital Technologies and Global Politics. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
Google Scholar

Buchan, Rusel. “The International Legal Regulation of State-Sponsored Cyber Espionage.” In International Cyber Norms: Legal, Policy & Industry Perspectives, edited by Osula, Anna-Maria and Roigas, Henry. Tallin, 2016.
Google Scholar

Chatinakrob, Thanapt. “Interplay of International Law and Cyberspace: State Sovereignty Violation, Extraterritorial Effects, and the Paradigm of Cyber Sovereignty.” Chinese Journal of International Law, Volume 23, Issue 1, March 2024.
Google Scholar

Corn, Garry, Taylor, Robert. “Sovereignty in the Age of Cyber”, AJIL Unbound 2017, vol. 111.
Google Scholar

Crawford, James. Creation of States. Cambridge, 2004.
Google Scholar

Crawford, James. Browlnie’s Principles of Public International Law. Oxford, 2012.
Google Scholar

Crawford, James. Chance, Order, Change: The Course of International Law. General Course on Public International Law. RCADI, vol. 365 (2014).
Google Scholar

Crawford, James, Koskenniemi, Matti (eds). The Cambridge Companion to International Law. Cambridge University Press ,2012.
Google Scholar

Creemers, R. “China’s Conception of Cyber Sovereignty – Rhetoric and Realization.” In Governing Cyberspace: Behavior, Power, and Diplomacy. Digital Technologies and Global Politics, edited by Broeders, D. and Berg, B. van den (eds.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2020.
Google Scholar

Dworkin, Richard. Taking Rights Seriously. London, Bloomsbury, 2013.
Google Scholar

Goldsmith, Jack, Loomis, Alexis. “’Defend Forward’ and Sovereignty.” Aegis Series Paper No. 2102.
Google Scholar

Fitzmaurice, Gerard. The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law. RCADI, 1957.
Google Scholar

Heller, Kevin. “In Defense of Pure Sovereignty in Cyberspace.” International Law Studies 2021, vol. 97.
Google Scholar

Jamnejad, Maziar and Wood, Michael. “The Principle of Non-intervention.” Leiden Journal of International Law 2009, vol. 22.
Google Scholar

Jančárková, Tatana (eds.). 12th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: 20/20 Vision: the Next Decade. Tallinn, 2020.
Google Scholar

Jennings, Robert and Watts, Arthur (eds.). Oppenheim’s International Law: Peace. 9th ed. 1992.
Google Scholar

Kastelic, Andrea. Due diligence in cyberspace. Normative expectations of reciprocal protection of international legal rights. UNIDIR 2021.
Google Scholar

Kenny, Jac. “Cyber Operations And The Status Of Due Diligence Obligations In International Law.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 2024, vol. 73, no. 1.
Google Scholar

Kranz, Jerzy. Pojęcie suwerenności we współczesnym prawie międzynarodowym [The concept of sovereingty in international law]. Warszawa, 2015.
Google Scholar

Kushwaha Neal, Roguski Przemysław, Watson Bruce, “Sovereignty and Non-intervention Up in the air: ensuring government data sovereignty in the cloud” [in:] Jančárková Tatiana, Lindström Lauri, Signoretti Massimiliano (eds.) 12th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: 20/20 Vision: the Next Decade, Tallinn 2020, p. 43-61
Google Scholar

Kwiecień, Roman. Suwerenność państwa. Rekonstrukcja i znaczenie idei w prawie międzynarodowym [Sovereingty of state, Reconsutruction and the importance of the idea in international law]. Kraków, 2004.
Google Scholar

Lowe, Vaugham. International Law. Oxford, 2007.
Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko. “Revisiting Coercion as an Element of Prohibited Intervention in International Law.” American Journal of International Law, 2023, Vol. 117, no. 4.
Google Scholar

Milanovic, Marko, Schmitt, Michael. “Attacks and Cyber (Mis)information Operations during a Pandemic.” Journal of National Security Law & Policy, 2020, Vol. 11.
Google Scholar

Moynihan, Harriet. “The Application of International Law to State Cyberattacks.” Chatham House Research Paper, December 2019.
Google Scholar

Moynihan, Harriet. “The vital role of international law in the framework for responsible state behaviour in cyberspace.” Journal of Cyber Policy 2021.
Google Scholar

Moynihan, Harriet. “Unpacking due diligence in cyberspace.” Journal of Cyber Policy 2023, 8:1.
Google Scholar

Mueller, Milton. “Hague Keynote: Sovereignty in Cyberspace”, https://www.internetgovernance.org/2020/11/13/hague-keynote-sovereignty-in-cyberspace.
Google Scholar

Osula, Anna-Maria, Roigas, Henry (eds.). International Cyber Norms: Legal, Policy & Industry Perspectives, 2016.
Google Scholar

Przychodniak, Marcin. “China’s Internet Policy”, Bulletin PISM 2017.
Google Scholar

Schmitt , Michael and Vihul, Liz. “Respect for Sovereignty in Cyberspace.” Texas Law Review 2017.
Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael and Durward, John. “Responding to Hostile Cyber Operations: The ‘In-Kind’ Option.” International Legal Studies 2021, Vol. 97.
Google Scholar

Schmitt Michael (eds.). Tallinn Manual 2.0. Cambridge 2017.
Google Scholar

Schmitt, Michael. “Foreign Cyber Interference in Elections.” International Legal Studies, Vol. 97, 2021.
Google Scholar

Shaw, Malcolm. International law. Cambridge, 2008.
Google Scholar

Terry, Patrick. “’The Riddle Of The Sands’ Peacetime Espionage And Public International Law.” Georgetown Journal of International Law 2020, Vol. 51, no. 2.
Google Scholar

Tsagourias, Nicholas and Buchan, Russel (eds.). Research Handbook on International Law and Cyberspace. Elgar, 2021.
Google Scholar

Tsagourias, Nicholas. “Malicious Cyber Operations against Health Infrastructure during the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Renvoi to Sovereignty in Cyberspace.” ESIL Reflections 17 December 2020 Vol. 9, Issue 4.
Google Scholar

Verdross, Alfred, Simma, Brunno and Geiger, Richard. “Territoriale Souveranitdt und Gebietshoheit.” Ósterreichisches Zeitschnft fur óffentliches Recht und Vólkerrecht, 1980, no 31.
Google Scholar

Viñuales, Jorge (ed.) The UN Friendly Relations Declaration at 50. An Assessment of the Fundamental Principles of International Law. Cambridge, 2020.
Google Scholar

Watts, Sean. “Low-Intensity Cyber Operations and the Principle of Non-Intervention.” In Cyber War: Law and Ethics for Virtual Conflicts, edited by Ohlin, Jens David, Govern, Kevin and Finkelstein, Claire (eds.). Oxford, 2015.
Google Scholar