The  Court of Justice, the National Courts, and the Controversy over the ‘Ultimate Arbiter’ of the Constitutionality of Law in the European Union

Roman Kwiecień

doi:10.21697/priel.2019.8.1.01

Opublikowane: 2020-01-30

Tom 8 Nr 1 (2019)

The Court of Justice, the National Courts, and the Controversy over the ‘Ultimate Arbiter’ of the Constitutionality of Law in the European Union

Roman Kwiecień

Polish Review of International and European Law

Dział: Studies

https://doi.org/10.21697/priel.2019.8.1.01

Abstrakt

The paper addresses the issue of a judicial forum entitled to resolve conflicts between European Union law and national constitutional rules. First and foremost, the issue is discussed under the old primacy/supremacy of EU law controversy. The author seeks to answer whether the national law, including constitutional rules, of a Member State can be ineffective owing to being contradictory to EU law. If so, by whom can national laws be held ineffective? In other words, which of the two judicial fora (national and European) have the last word in these conflicts or who is the ultimate arbiter of the constitutionality of law within the European legal space? The author argues that legal reasoning should reconcile, on the one hand, the specificity of the EU’s unique legal order and effective application of its provisions and, on the other hand, the international legal status of the Member States and their constitutions. This approach leads to the conclusion that there is no ultimate judicial arbiter within the European legal space.

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Kwiecień, R. (2020). The Court of Justice, the National Courts, and the Controversy over the ‘Ultimate Arbiter’ of the Constitutionality of Law in the European Union. Polish Review of International and European Law, 8(1), 9–41. https://doi.org/10.21697/priel.2019.8.1.01

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Albi A.& van Elsuwege P., The EU Constitution, National Constitutions and Sovereignty: An Assessment of a “European Constitutional Order”, ‘European Law Review’ 2004, vol. 29.
Google Scholar

Alter K. J., The European Court’s Political Power. Selected Essays, OUP, Oxford 2009.
Google Scholar

Beck G., The Problem of Kompetenz-Kompetenz: A Conflict between Right and Right in Which There Is No Praetor, ‘European Law Review’ 2005, vol. 30.
Google Scholar

Boulouis J., Chevallier R.M., Grands Arrêts de la Cour de Justice des Communautes Européennes, 6th ed., vol. I, Dalloz-Sirey, Paris 1994.
Google Scholar

Bradley K. St C., Powers and Procedures in the EU Constitution: Legal Bases and the Court, [in:] P. Craig, G. De Búrca (eds.), ‘The Evolution of EU Law’, 2nd ed., OUP 2011.
Google Scholar

Crawford J., Sovereignty as a Legal Value [in:] J. Crawford, M. Koskenniemi (eds), ‘The Cambridge Companion to International Law’, CUP 2012.
Google Scholar

Dashwood A., States in the European Union, ‘European Law Review’ 1998, vol. 23.
Google Scholar

Frowein J.A., Solange II, ‘Common Market Law Review’ 1988, vol. 25.
Google Scholar

Jacobs F.G., The Sovereignty of Law. The European Way, CUP, Cambridge 2007.
Google Scholar

Kowalik-Bańczyk K., Should We Polish It Up? The Polish Constitutional Tribunal and the Idea of Supremacy of EU Law, ‘German Law Journal’ 2005, no. 10.
Google Scholar

Kumm M. & Ferreres Comella V., The Future of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union: Constitutional Supremacy after the Constitutional Treaty, ‘Jean Monnet Working Paper’ 5/04, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/04/040501-15.pdf.
Google Scholar

Kumm M. & Ferreres Comella V., The Primacy Clause of the Constitutional Treaty and the Future of Constitutional Conflict in the European Union, ‘ICON’ 2005, vol. 3. p. 1479.
Google Scholar

Kwiecień R., The Primacy of European Union Law over National Law under the Constitutional Treaty, ‘German Law Journal. Special Issue – Unity of the European Constitution’ 2005 , no. 11.
Google Scholar

Lenaerts K., Constitutionalism and the Many Faces of Federalism, ‘American Journal of Comparative Law’ 1990, vol. 38.
Google Scholar

Lenaerts K. & Gerard D., The Structure of the Union according to the Constitution for Europe: the Emperor Is Getting Dressed, ‘European Law Review’ 2004, vol. 29.
Google Scholar

Łętowska E., Multicentryczność współczesnego systemu prawa i jej konsekwencje, ‘Państwo i Prawo’ 2005, no. 4.
Google Scholar

MacCormick N., The New European Constitution. Legal and Philosophical Perspective, Biuro Trybunału Konstytucyjnego, Warsaw 2003.
Google Scholar

MacCormick N., Questionning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth, OUP, Oxford 1999.
Google Scholar

Maduro M.P., Europe and the Constitution: What if This Is As Good As It Gets?, [in:] J.H.H. Weiler & M. Wind (eds.), ‘European Constitutionalism Beyond the State’, CUP, Cambridge 2003.
Google Scholar

Mayer F.C, Europarecht als französisches Verfassungsrecht, ‘Europarecht’ 2004, no. 6
Google Scholar

Mayer F.C., The European Constitution and the Courts. Adjudicating European Constitutional Law in a Multilevel System, ‘Jean Monnet Working Paper’, 9/2003, http://www.jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/03/030901-03.pdf.
Google Scholar

Mayer F.C., Supremacy lost? – Comment on Roman Kwiecień, ‘German Law Journal. Special Issue – Unity of the European Constitution’ 2005 , no. 11.
Google Scholar

Mik C., State Sovereignty and European Integration: Public International Law, EU Law and Constitutional Law in the Polish Context, [in:] N. Walker (ed.), ‘Sovereignty in Transition’, Hart, Oxford-Portland 2003.
Google Scholar

Pernice I., Multilevel Constitutionalism in the European Union, ‘Whi-Paper’ 2002/2, http://www.whi-berlin.de/pernice-constitutionalism.htm.
Google Scholar

A Pre-emptive Strike from the Palais Royal, Editorial, ‘European Law Review’ 2005, vol. 30.
Google Scholar

Schilling T., The Autonomy of the Community Legal Order: An Analysis of Possible Foundations, ‘Harvard International Law Journal’ 1996, vol. 37.
Google Scholar

Schmid C.U., The Neglected Conciliation Approach to the ‘Final Arbiter’ Conflict, ‘Common Market Law Review’ 1999, vol. 36.
Google Scholar

Stone Sweet A., The European Court of Justice, [in:] P. Craig, G. De Búrca (eds.), ‘The Evolution of EU Law’, 2nd ed., OUP 2011.
Google Scholar

Stone Sweet A., The Judicial Construction of Europe, OUP, Oxford 2004.
Google Scholar

Stone Sweet A., The Juridical Coup d’État and the Problem of Authority, ‘German Law Journal’ 2007 no. 10.
Google Scholar

Verhoeven A., The European Union in Search of a Democratic and Constitutional Theory, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002.
Google Scholar

Weiler J.H.H., In Defense of the Status Quo: Europe’s Constitutional Sonderweg, [in:] J.H.H. Weiler & Marlene Wind (eds.), ‘European Constitutionalism Beyond the State’, CUP, Cambridge 2003.
Google Scholar

Weiler J.H.H. & von Bogdandy A., Doctrine of Principles, ‘Jean Monnet Working Paper’ 2003, 9/03, http://jeanmonnetprogram.org/papers/03/030901-01.pdf.
Google Scholar

Weiler J.H.H & Haltern U.R., Autonomy of the Community Legal Order – Through the Looking Glass, ‘Harvard International Law Journal’ 1996, vol. 37.
Google Scholar

De Witte B., Direct Effect, Primacy and the Nature of the Legal Order, [in:] P. Craig, G. De Búrca (eds.), ‘The Evolution of EU Law’, 2nd ed., OUP 2011.
Google Scholar

De Witte B.,”Retour à Costa”. La primauté du droit communautaire à lumière du droit international, ‘Revue Trimestrielle de Droit Européen’ 1984, no. 20.
Google Scholar

Wouters J., National Constitutions and the European Union, ‘Legal Issues of Economic Integration’ 2000, no. 27.
Google Scholar

Roman Kwiecień

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0831-9203

Afiliacja:

Jagiellonian University in Kraków Polska

Biogram

Professor, Faculty of Law and Administration, Jagiellonian University in Kraków