The Idea of Unity and Catholicity of the Church in the Custom of Mentioning the Bishop’s Name in the Eucharistic Prayer

Andrzej Żądło

doi:10.21697/ct.2022.92.2.07

Published: 2022-05-28

Vol. 92 No. 2 (2022)

The Idea of Unity and Catholicity of the Church in the Custom of Mentioning the Bishop’s Name in the Eucharistic Prayer

Andrzej Żądło

Collectanea Theologica

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.2022.92.2.07

Abstract

The editio tertia emendata of the Paul VI Missal was made available to the Church in 2008. Particularly noteworthy among the many emendationes of this edition is the one that refers to the situation when the bishop celebrates the Holy Mass outside his own diocese. In the Missal published in 2002, it was suggested that this mention should be as follows: et me indigno famulo tuo, et fratre meo N., Episcopo huius Ecclesiae N. In the revised edition it is proposed that the “guest” bishop should mention his brother first (et fratre meo N.), who for him is the bishop of the diocese where he celebrates Mass, and only later mention himself (et me indigno famulo tuo). In doing so, he should also not additionally define the local Church as “N.,” i.e., for example, Varsovian or Washingtonian, which, as such, do not exist, but he should pray for the bishop of “this Church” (huius Ecclesiae), within which he celebrates the liturgy in communion with the universal Church, emphasized by fraternal unity with the local pastor. The article shows that this modification is of great theological significance and corresponds to the ecclesiology of Vatican II.

Keywords:

bishop, diocese, Eucharist, name, unity, Church, Paul VI Missal

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Andrzej Żądło, The Idea and the Theology of the Fatherland in the Texts of the Paul VI Missal , Collectanea Theologica: Vol. 93 No. 3 (2023)

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Żądło, A. (2022). The Idea of Unity and Catholicity of the Church in the Custom of Mentioning the Bishop’s Name in the Eucharistic Prayer. Collectanea Theologica, 92(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.2022.92.2.07

Cited by / Share

References

Barba, M., “La menzione del vescovo nelle intercessioni della Preghiera Eucaristica,” Ephemerides Liturgicae 122/4 (2008) 385–396.
Google Scholar

Barba, M., Missale romanum. Processi evolutivi nella terza edizione emendata del 2008 (Theologica uxentina 6; Roma – Monopoli: Viverien 2015).
Google Scholar

Chupungco, A.J., “Storia della liturgia nei primi quattro secoli,” Scientia liturgica. Manuale di Liturgia. I. Introduzione alla liturgia (ed. A.J. Chupungco; Casale Monferrato: Piemme 1998) 109–128.
Google Scholar

Congregation for Divine Worship, Decree De nomine episcopi in prece eucharistica proferendo (1972), Notitiae 8 (1972) 347–349.
Google Scholar

The Consilium for the Execution of the Liturgy Constitution, “Declaration De nonnullis in novis precibus eucharisticis definiendis (1968),” Notitiae 4 (1968) 356.
Google Scholar

Cuva, A., “‘…una cum… antistite nostro N.’ La menzione del Vescovo nella Preghiera Eucaristica,” Notitiae 27 (1991) 130–142.
Google Scholar

Emminghaus, J.E., Die Messe. Wesen, Gestalt, Vollzug. Durchgesehen und überarbeitet von Th. Maas-Ewerd (5th ed.; Klosterneuburg: Verlag Österreichisches Katholisches Bibelwerk 1992).
Google Scholar

“Fermentum,” Leksykon liturgii (ed. B. Nadolski; Poznań: Pallottinum 2006) 466–467.
Google Scholar

Giraudo, C., “Dimensione verticale e dimensione orizzontale nella preghiera della Chiesa,” Il concilio venti anni dopo. III. Il rapporto Chiesa-mondo (ed. N. Galantino; Roma: AVE 1986) 159–176.
Google Scholar

Hofmann, J., “Znaczenie Kościoła rzymskiego i jego biskupa dla Kościoła powszechnego od ‘konstantyńskiego przełomu’ do Soboru Chalcedońskiego (451),” Rocznik Teologii Katolickiej 8 (2009) 175–192. http://hdl.handle.net/11320/1296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15290/rtk.2009.08.14
Google Scholar

Ignatius Antiochenus, Letter to the Church in Smyrna, in Pierwsi świadkowie. Pisma Ojców apostolskich (ed. M. Starowieyski; trans. A. Świderkówna; Biblioteka Ojców Kościoła 10; Kraków: Wydawnictwo M 2010) 136–139.
Google Scholar

“Institutio generalis Missalis Romani,” Missale Romanum ex decreto Sacrosancti Oecumenici Concilii Vaticani II instauratum, auctoritate Pauli PP. VI promulgatum, Ioannis Pauli PP. II cura recognitum (3rd ed.; Vatican: Typis Vaticanis 2002) 17–86; (USA edition, Downers Grove, IL: Midwest Theological Forum 2015) 14–61.
Google Scholar

“Kościół tytularny,” Leksykon liturgii (ed. B. Nadolski; Poznań: Pallottinum 2006) 686–687.
Google Scholar

Krakowiak, C., “Fermentum – Sancta,” Encyklopedia katolicka. V. (ed. L. Bieńkowski et al.; Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego 1989) col. 136.
Google Scholar

Kunzler, M., Liturgia Kościoła (Amateka: Podręczniki teologii katolickiej 10; ed. and trans. L. Balter; Poznań: Pallottinum 1999).
Google Scholar

Maas-Ewerd, T., “Nominari debet. Zur Nennung des Papstes, des Ortsbischofs und des Kollegiums der Bischöfe im eucharistischen Hochgebet,” Gratias agamus. Studien zum eucharistischen Hochgebet (eds. A. Heinz – H. Rennings, Freiburg – Basel – Wien: Herder 1992) 269–281.
Google Scholar

Metzger, M., “Storia della celebrazione eucaristica in Occidente,” Scientia liturgica. Manuale di Liturgia, III. L’Eucaristia (ed. A.J. Chupungco; Casale Monferrato: Piemme 2003) 114–143.
Google Scholar

Michałek, R., “Imię biskupa w Modlitwie Eucharystycznej,” Collectanea Theologica 43/4 (1973) 54–56.
Google Scholar

Missale Romanum ex decreto Sacrosancti Oecumenici Concilii Vaticani II instauratum auctoritate Pauli PP. VI promulgatum Ioannis Pauli PP. II cura recognitum (3rd ed.; Vatican: Typis Vaticanis 2002).
Google Scholar

Missale Romanum ex decreto Sacrosancti Oecumenici Concilii Vaticani II instauratum auctoritate Pauli PP. VI promulgatum Ioannis Pauli PP. II cura recognitum (3rd ed.; Downers Grove, IL: Midwest Theological Forum 2015).
Google Scholar

Missale romanum ex decreto SS. Concilii Tridentini restitutum Summorum Pontificum cura recognitum. Editio typica 1962 (eds. M. Sodi – A. Toniolo; Monumenta Liturgica Piana 1; Vatican: Typis Vaticanis 2007).
Google Scholar

Nadolski, B., Liturgika. I. Liturgika fundamentalna (2nd ed.; Poznań: Pallottinum 2014).
Google Scholar

Nautin, P., “Le rite du « fermentum » dans les églises urbaines de Rome,” Ephemerides Liturgicae 96 (1982) 510–522.
Google Scholar

“Ordo Romanus I,” Les Ordines Romani du haut Moyen Âge. II. Les textes (Ordines I–XIII) (ed. M. Andrieu; Réimpression anastatique; Louvain: Spicilegium sacrum Lovaniense 1971) 67–108.
Google Scholar

“Ordo Romanus II,” Les Ordines Romani du haut Moyen Âge. II. Les textes (Ordines I–XIII) (ed. M. Andrieu; Réimpression anastatique; Louvain: Spicilegium sacrum Lovaniense 1971) 113–116.
Google Scholar

Posoborowe prawodawstwo kościelne. Dokumenty prawno-liturgiczne. V. Book 1 (coll. and trans. E. Sztafrowski; Warszawa: Akademia Teologii Katolickiej 1974).
Google Scholar

Righetti, M., Manuale di storia liturgica. III. La Messa. Commento storico-liturgico alla luce del Concilio Vaticano II (3rd ed.; Milano: Ancora 2014).
Google Scholar

Sinka, T., Liturgika (Kraków: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Teologicznego Księży Misjonarzy 1994).
Google Scholar

Śrutwa, J., “Edykt mediolański,” Encyklopedia katolicka. IV. (ed. R. Łukaszyk et al.; Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego 1985) col. 666.
Google Scholar

Vagaggini, C., Il Canone della Messa e la riforma liturgica. Problemi e progetti (Quaderni di Rivista Liturgica 4; Torino: Elle Di Ci 1966).
Google Scholar

Vaticanum II, Constitution on the Sacred Liturgy Sacrosanctum Concilium (1963).
Google Scholar

Vaticanum II, Dogmatic Constitution on the Church Lumen gentium (1964).
Google Scholar