Balthasar, H.U. von, Teodramatyka. I. Prolegomena (ed. Z.J. Kijas; trans. M. Mijalska – M. Rodkiewicz – W. Szymona; Kraków: Wydawnictwo M 2005).
Google Scholar
Bielawski, K., “Χρόνος (chronos) – καιρός (kairos) – αἰών (aion): czas dla filologa,” Boska radość powtórzenia, idea wiecznego powrotu (ed. M. Proszak – A. Szklarska – A. Żymełka; Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego 2014) 63–70.
Google Scholar
Bielecki, S., “Nowotestamentalne ujęcie terminu kairos,” Ruch Biblijny i Liturgiczny 45/2–6 (1992) 57–65.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21906/rbl.1963
Google Scholar
Bujak, J., Człowiek jako imago Dei. Wokół antropologicznych treści w wybranych dokumentach dialogów doktrynalnych (Szczecin: Faculty of Theology of the University of Szczecin 2007).
Google Scholar
Catechism of the Catholic Church (2nd ed.; Huntington: Our Sunday Visitor 2020).
Google Scholar
Catts, O., The Art of The Semi-Living, https://www.academia.edu/74833933/The_Art_of_The_Semi_Living (access 15.04.2022).
Google Scholar
Cortez, M., Theological Anthropology: A Guide for the Perplexed (London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark 2010).
Google Scholar
Davis, J., “Cases for Genetic Art,” Sings of Life: Bio Art and Beyond (ed. E. Kac; Cambridge, MA – London: The MIT Press 2009) 249–266.
Google Scholar
Debatty, R., Que le cheval vive en moi (May the horse live in me), https://we-make-money-not-art.com/que_le_cheval_vive_en_moi_may/ (accessed on 10.05.2022).
Google Scholar
Denzinger, H., Enchiridion symbolorum definitionum et declarationum de rebus fidei et morum. Compendium of Creeds, Definitions, and Declarations on Matters of Faith and Morals (revised and extended ed.; ed. P. Hünermann; Latin-English ¬43rd ed.; trans. R. Fastiggi – A. Englund Nash; San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press 2012) (= DH).
Google Scholar
Duszek, K.E., “Theological Insight into the Phenomenon of Life: The Bios as a Vestigium Dei,” Teologia w Polsce 13/1 (2019) 59–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/twp.2019.13.1.04.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/twp.2019.13.1.04
Google Scholar
Dybel, P., Gadamera myśl o sztuce (Gdańsk: Academy of Fine Arts in Gdańsk 2014).
Google Scholar
Heller, M. – Pabjan, T., Stworzenie i początek Wszechświata. Teologia – filozofia – kosmologia (Kraków: Copernicus Center Press 2013).
Google Scholar
Herder, J.G., Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit (Berlin – Weimar: Aufbau 1965).
Google Scholar
Hobson, G., Imago Dei: Man/Woman created in the Image of God: Implications for Theology, Pastoral Care, Eucharist, Apologetics, Aesthetics (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock 2019).
Google Scholar
John Paul II, Apostolic Exhortation Ecclesia in Europa (2003).
Google Scholar
John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Veritatis Splendor (1993) (= VS).
Google Scholar
John Paul II, Letter to artists (1999), https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/letters/1999/documents/hf_jp-ii_let_23041999_artists.html (access 15.07.2022).
Google Scholar
Kac, E., “Bio Art: From Genesis to Natural History of Enigma,” Folia Philosophica 28 (2010) 13–37.
Google Scholar
Kac, E., “Life Transformation – Art Mutation,” Signs of Life: Bio Art and Beyond (ed. E. Kac; Cambridge, MA – London: The MIT Press 2009) 163–184.
Google Scholar
Kac, E., “Transgenic Art,” Artnodes 1/1 (2002). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i1.676.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i1.676
Google Scholar
Krąpiec, M.A., “Od mimesis do katharsis,” U podstaw rozumienia kultury (ed. M.A. Krąpiec; Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL 1991) 201–215.
Google Scholar
Kupczak, J., “Antropologia,” Dogmatyka w perspektywie Bożego Miłosierdzia (Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL 2010) 89–101.
Google Scholar
Lasek, P.A., “Zjawisko ‘duszy’ w Heksaemeron,” Verbum vitae 40/3 (2022) 613–630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.13873.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/vv.13873
Google Scholar
Lapworth, A., “Habit, art, and the plasticity of the subject: the ontogenetic shock of the bioart encounter,” Cultural geographies 22/1 (2015) 85–102.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013491926
Google Scholar
Lapworth, A., “Theorizing Bioart Encounters after Gilbert Simondon,” Theory, Culture & Society 33/3 (2016) 123–150.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415580173
Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Bioart and the vitality of media (Seattle, WA – London: University of Washington 2010).
Google Scholar
Müller, G.L., Katholische Dogmatik. Für Studium und Praxis der Theologie (Freiburg – Basel – Wien: Herder 1995).
Google Scholar
Myers, W., BioArt: Altered Realities (New York, NY: Thames & Hudson 2015).
Google Scholar
Nadis, S., “Science for art’s sake,” Nature 407 (2000) 668–670.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35037788
Google Scholar
Pannenberg, W., What Is Man? Contemporary Anthropology in Theological Perspective (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press 1970).
Google Scholar
Pędrak, A., “Interpretation of spiritual life according to the Imago Dei,” Teologia w Polsce 14/1 (2020) 169–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/twp.2020.14.1.08.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/twp.2020.14.1.08
Google Scholar
Pędrak, A., “Umbra Dei. A Theological Interpretation of Psychological Life,” Teologia w Polsce 13/1 (2019) 87–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/twp.2019.13.1.06.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/twp.2019.13.1.06
Google Scholar
Rozynek, M., “Bioart, czyli mariaż sztuki i nauki,” Tutoring Gedanensis 3/11 (2018) 29–32.
Google Scholar
Siwecki, L., Człowiek odczytany w Bogu Ojcu. Teologiczno-antropologiczne refleksje w nauczaniu Jana Pawła II (Lublin: Towarzystwo naukowe KUL 2020).
Google Scholar
Vaticanum II, Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World Gaudium et spes (1965).
Google Scholar
Vaage, N.S., “What Ethics for Bioart?,” Nanoethics 10/10 (2016) 87–104.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0253-6
Google Scholar
Wilczek, K., Antropologia filozoficzna a antropologia teologiczna Karola Wojtyły – Jana Pawła II (Kraków: Wydawnictwo scriptum 2018).
Google Scholar
Wojtyła, K., “Człowiek jest osobą,” Osoba i czyn oraz inne studia antropologiczne (ed. The Learned Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin; Lublin: Towarzystwo naukowe KUL 2000) 415–420.
Google Scholar
Woźniak, J.R., “Dogmatyka w perspektywie interdyscyplinarnej. Prolegomena teoretyczno-metodologiczne,” Dogmat i metoda. Wprowadzenie do badań interdyscyplinarnych w teologii dogmatycznej (ed. R.J. Woźniak; Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM 2021) 17–50.
Google Scholar
Yetisen, A.K. – Davis, J. – Coskun, A.F. – Church, G.M. – Yun, S.H., “Bioart,” Trends in Biotechnology 33/12 (2015) 724–734.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.09.011
Google Scholar
Žukauskaité, A., “Hybrids, Chimeras, Aberrant Nuptials: New Modes of Cohabitation in Bioart,” Nordic Theatre Studies 31/1 (2019) 22–37.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/nts.v31i1.113000
Google Scholar