Poważny brak rozeznania oceniającego co do istotnych praw i obowiązków małżeńskich (kan. 1095 n. 2 KPK) w świetle wyroku Roty Rzymskiej "coram" Erlebach z 16 października 2008 r.

Wojciech Góralski

doi:10.21697/im.2013.18(24).10

Published: 2013-01-15

Vol. 24 No. 18 (2013)

A serious lack of the evaluative analysis regarding significant marital rights and obligations (can. 1095, n.2 of the Code of Canon Law) in view of a decision of the Roman Rota c. Erlebach of 16 October 2008

Wojciech Góralski

Ius Matrimoniale

Section: Orzecznictwo sądowe

https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2013.18(24).10

Abstract

The author presents and comments on the Rotal decision (negative) issued in the second instance after appealing against the decision (positive) issued in the first instance (by one-man tribunal) by the respondent due to a serious lack of the evaluative analysis of both parties. The Rotal judge, after a thorough interpretation of the code-based expression discretio iudicii (including three elements), emphasizes that not always the lack of such analysis constitutes inability to come to a marital agreement. This inability shall constitute exclusively the serious lack of discretio iudicii, both in its internal and external aspects.

Keywords:

marital rights, conjugal duty, grave defect of discretion of judgment, canon 1095 n. 2 CIC/1983

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Góralski, W. (2013). A serious lack of the evaluative analysis regarding significant marital rights and obligations (can. 1095, n.2 of the Code of Canon Law) in view of a decision of the Roman Rota c. Erlebach of 16 October 2008. Ius Matrimoniale, 24(18), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2013.18(24).10

Cited by / Share