Forma wyrażenia zgody małżeńskiej określona w kan. 1104 § 1-2 KPK

Ginter Dzierżon

doi:10.21697/im.2017.28.3.01

Published: 2017-09-18

Vol. 28 No. 3 (2017)

The Form of Expressing Matrimonial Consent Specified in Can. 1104 § 1-2 CIC

Ginter Dzierżon

Ius Matrimoniale

Section: Rozprawy i artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2017.28.3.01

Abstract

The analyses of the current legal order show that for a marriage to become contracted validly the contracting parties need to be present together or may enter into marriage by proxy (proxies).

Naturally, for a marriage to be valid it is insufficient to express matrimonial consent in the internal sphere only; it is necessary to externalize the consent with the aim of its social verification45 but also because of the dignity of the other party to whom a nupturient is willing to give himself.

Canonists agree that according to the natural law matrimonial consent in its external sphere could be expressed in any possible way. However, in the ecclesiastical order the legislator did not allow this kind of latitude and specified the forms of expression of matrimonial consent (as discussed in can. 1104 § 1-2 CIC). In an ordinary situation, if both nupturients can speak, they should contract a marriage in words although meeting this requirement is not necessary for the validity but rather for the fairness of the act. However, in extraordinary conditions, when at least one person cannot speak, it is possible to express one’s consent through equivalent signs. Silence nonetheless does not meet the criteria discussed here since in this hypothesis one’s will remains inertial and, as a result, a legal act does not attain effectivity in the system.

Keywords:

matrimonial consent, form, word, equivalent signs, canon 1104 § 1-2 CIC

Download files

PDF (Język Polski) PDF

Citation rules

Dzierżon, G. (2017). The Form of Expressing Matrimonial Consent Specified in Can. 1104 § 1-2 CIC. Ius Matrimoniale, 28(3), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2017.28.3.01

Cited by / Share

References

a. Źródła
Google Scholar

Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium auctoritate Joannis Pauli PP. II promulgatus-18.10.1990, AAS 82 (1990), s. 1045-1363; Kodeks Kanonów Kościołów Wschodnich promulgowany przez papieża Jana Pawła II, tłum. L. Adamowicz, M. Dyjakowska, Lublin 2002.
Google Scholar

Google Scholar

Codex Iuris Canonici auctoritate Joannis Pauli PP. II promulgatus-25.01.1983, AAS 75 (1983), pars II, s. 1-317; tekst polski, Kodeks Prawa Kanonicznego. Przekład polski zatwierdzony przez Konferencję Episkopatu, Poznań 1984.
Google Scholar

Codex Iuris Canonici Pii X Maximi iussu digestus Benediicti Papae XV auctoritatae promulgatus-25.01.1917, AAS 9 (1917), pars II, s. 1-593.
Google Scholar

Dec. c. Grazioli z 10 VII 1939, SRRD, t. 31, s. 435-450.
Google Scholar

Pontificia Commisio Codici Iuris Canonici Recognoscendo, Liber IV - De iure matrimoniali (Series Altera) - Sessio III 16-21 V 1977,Textus et disceptatio de matrimoniis mixtis: cann. 276-278 et 4us novus, 321, 280, 279; de impedimentis dirimentibus: cann. 282-294; de consensu matrimoniali: cann. 295-310; [divisi o Sessionis erronea est], Communicationes 9 (1977), s. 357-378.
Google Scholar

Obrzędy sakramentu małżeństwa dostosowane do zwyczajów diecezji polskich, Katowice 19732.
Google Scholar

Sacra Congregatio Sancti Officii, Responsa-15 VII 1949, w: Leges Ecclesiae, t. 2, kol. 2615.
Google Scholar

Suprema Sacra Congregatio S. Offici, Responsa-18 V 1949, AAS 41(1949), s. 427.
Google Scholar

b. Opracowania
Google Scholar

Althaus R., Prader J., Reinhard J.F., Das kirchiliches Eherecht in der seelsorgeriscger Praxis, Essen 20145.
Google Scholar

Andreini P.M., De matrimonio, Bologna 1998.
Google Scholar

Aznar Gíl F., Derecho matrimonial canónico, t. 2, Salamanca 2002.
Google Scholar

Bersini F., Il diritto canonico matrimoniale, Torino 1994.
Google Scholar

Biskupski S., Prawo małżeńskie Kościoła Rzymskokatolickiego, Warszawa 1956.
Google Scholar

Boni G., La manifestazione del consenso matrimoniale e il matrimonio per procura e per interprete, w: Diritto matrimoniale, red. P. A. Bonnet, C. Gullo, Città del Vaticano 2007, s. 605-683.
Google Scholar

Chiappetta L., Il matrimonio nella nuova legislazione canonica e concordatoria, Roma 1990.
Google Scholar

Fornés J., Derecho matrimonial canónico, Madrid 2008.
Google Scholar

Gasparri P., Tractatus canonicus de matrimonio, t. 1., Typis Polyglotis Vatinanis 1932.
Google Scholar

Góralski W., Kościelne prawo małżeńskie, Warszawa 2006.
Google Scholar

Hendriks J., Diritto matrimoniale. Commento ai canoni 1055-1165, Milano 1998.
Google Scholar

Lüdicke K., Heiligungsamt: Ehe, w: Münsterischer Kommentar zum Codex Iuris Canonici, red. K. Lüdicke, t. 1, Essen 1985, ad 1104.
Google Scholar

Pawluk T., Prawo kanoniczne według Kodeksu Jana Pawła II, t. 3, Olsztyn 1984.
Google Scholar

Prader J., Il matrimonio in oriente e in occidente, Roma 20032.
Google Scholar

Sabbarese L., Il matrimonio canonico nell’ordine della natura e della grazia, Roma 2016.
Google Scholar

Salachas D., Commento al. can. 837 CCEO, w: Commento al Codice dei Canoni delle Chiese Orientali, red. P.V.Pinto, Città del Vaticano 2001, s. 717-718.
Google Scholar

Schembri K., Oikonomia, Divorce and Remarriage in the Eastern Ortodox Tradition, Roma 2017.
Google Scholar

Sebott R., Das neue kirchliche Eherecht, Franfurt am Main 2005.
Google Scholar

Viladrich P.J., Konsens małżeński, tłum. S. Świaczny, Warszawa 2002.
Google Scholar

c. Słowniki
Google Scholar

Słowo: w: Słownik języka polskiego PWN, red. L. Drabik, A. Kubiak-Sokół, E. Sobol, L. Wiśniakowska, Warszawa 20143, s. 927.
Google Scholar