Wykluczenie dobra sakramentu, dobra wiary oraz dobra potomstwa po stronie pozwanej, a także wykluczenie dobra potomstwa po stronie powodowej (kan. 1101 § 2 KPK) w wyroku Roty Rzymskiej c. Bottone z 2 lutego 2010 roku

Ginter Dzierżon

doi:10.21697/im.2020.31.2.06

Published: 2020-12-15

Vol. 31 No. 2 (2020)

Exclusion of the good of the sacrament, exclusion of the good of the faith, exclusion of the good of the offspring on the defendant’s side as well as the exclusion of the good of the offspring on the plaintiff's side (can. 1101 § 2 CIC) in the judgment of

Ginter Dzierżon

Ius Matrimoniale

Section: Orzecznictwo sądowe

https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.06

Abstract

In the presented study the Author commented on the judgment of the Roman Rota c. Bottone of 2 February 2010. The analysis shows that the legal part of the rotal judgment was based on the general theory of a legal act. In the factual part ponens accumulated two titles exclusion of the good of the sacrament and exclusion of the good of faith. The invalidity of the marriage was proven using indirect proof. In the present case, it has been shown that what prompted the defendant to take such a step was the fact that even before the marriage she had maintained a relationship with another man. It was also proved that the plaintiff's exclusion of offspring was in close connection with the defendant's change of attitude towards him.

Keywords:

canonical marriage, defect of marital consent, judgment, exclusion of the good of sacrament, exclusion of the good of the offspring, exclusion of the good faith

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Dzierżon, G. (2020). Exclusion of the good of the sacrament, exclusion of the good of the faith, exclusion of the good of the offspring on the defendant’s side as well as the exclusion of the good of the offspring on the plaintiff’s side (can. 1101 § 2 CIC) in the judgment of. Ius Matrimoniale, 31(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2020.31.2.06

Cited by / Share