Instytucja apelacji wpadkowej w systemie prawa kanonicznego

Urszula  Nowicka

doi:10.21697/im.2022.33.1.06

Published: 2022-06-30

Vol. 33 No. 1 (2022)

Institution of incidental appeal in the system of canon law

Urszula Nowicka

Ius Matrimoniale

Section: Rozprawy i artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2022.33.1.06

Abstract

An appeal is an institution that is well known and is often used in litigation. However, the legislator also provided an incidental appeal, which may be filed by the defendant after being notified of the main appeal. The subject of this article is the analysis of the functioning of this institution in the ordinary litigation process, as well as in proceedings for nullity of marriage. These considerations include both theoretical issues related to the proper understanding of the incidental appeal, as well as special situations: the possibility of a litigation party changing its position, challenging the title by the defendant or the possibility of an incidental appeal by the defender of the marriage bond.

Keywords:

appeal, incidental appeal, litigation process, the nullity of marriage

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Nowicka, U. . (2022). Institution of incidental appeal in the system of canon law. Ius Matrimoniale, 33(1), 177–193. https://doi.org/10.21697/im.2022.33.1.06

Cited by / Share

References

ARROBA CONDE M.J., Diritto processuale canonico, Roma 2006.
BONI G., La recente riforma del processo di nullità matrimoniale. Problemi, criticità, dubbi (parte terza), Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale 11/2016, https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/ statoechiese/article/view/6955 [dostęp: 20.08.2021].
ERLEBACH G., La ejecutividad de la sentencia y del decreto de confirmación a la luz del Motu Pr. Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus, Ius communionis 7 (2019) nr 2, s. 275-326.
GROCHOLEWSKI Z., L’appello nelle cause di nullità matrimoniale, Forum 4/2 (1993), s. 24-27.
GROCHOLEWSKI Z., Principi ispiratori del libro VII del CIC, w: GRUPPO ITALIANO DOCENTI DI DIRITTO CANONICO (red.), I giudizi nella Chiesa. Il processo contenzioso e il processo matrimoniale, Milano 1998, s. 9-34.
MISZTAL-KONECKA J., Zakaz wyrokowania ponad żądanie strony (‘ne eat iudex ultra petita partium’) – rzymskie tradycje i współczesne regulacje polskiego procesowego prawa cywilnego, Zeszyty Prawnicze 12 (2012) nr 4, s. 41-56.
MONTINI G.P., L’appello in una causa di nullità matrimoniale, Quaderni di diritto ecclesiale 22 (2009), s. 318-334.
NOWAKOWSKI B., Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus – nadzieje i obawy sądownictwa kościelnego w sprawach o nieważność małżeństwa, Ius Matrimoniale 26 (2015) nr 3, s. 25-41.
NOWICKA U., Animadversiones obrońcy węzła małżeńskiego w trybunale apelacyjnym, Prawo Kanoniczne 53 (2010) nr 3-4, s. 223-243.
PEÑA GARCÍA C., l’appello nelle cause matrimoniali, w: FRANCESCHI H., ORTIZ M.A. (red.), Ius et matrimonium II. Temi processuali e sostanziali alla luce del Motu Proprio Mitis Iudex Dominus Iesus, Roma 2017, s. 310-339.
RAMOS F.J., MORAL CARVAJAL D., Diritto processuale canonico, vol. 1, Romae 2013.
RAMOS F.J., SKONIECZNY P., Diritto processuale canonico, vol. 2/2, Romae 2014.
RAMOS F.J., I tribunali ecclesiastici. Costituzione, organizzazione, norme processuali, cause matrimoniali, Roma 2000.
ROZKRUT T., Czy drugi wyrok w procesie małżeńskim jest konieczny?, Roczniki Nauk Prawnych t. 26 (2016) nr 2, s. 137-153. Google Scholar