Wpływ podstępu na ważność aktu prawnego (kan. 125 § 2 KPK)

GINTER DZIERŻON

doi:10.21697/pk.2017.60.1.02

Published: 2017-04-15

Vol. 60 No. 1 (2017)

The influence of deceit on the validity of a legal act (can. 125 § 2 CIC)

GINTER DZIERŻON

Prawo Kanoniczne

Section: Rozprawy i Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.2017.60.1.02

Abstract

A hypothesis presented in can. 125 § 2 CIC concerning the impact of deceit on the validity of a legal act became the focus of attention of the author of the presented article. His analyses showed that out of all kinds of deceit only accidental deceit has legal effect described in can. 125 § 2 CIC. This is because for the injured party involved this form does not cause a substantial but an accidental error which does not limit the liberty of an individual to an extent which would result in the invalidity of an act.

According to the author, the general rule codified in can. 125 § 2 CL is of great importance not only for theoretical-legal reasons but also because of the aspect of protection of the rights of an individual person. The legislator made it possible to rescind a valid legal act with a view to securing the rights of the injured party.

Keywords:

legal act, validity of a legal act, deceit, error

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

DZIERŻON, G. (2017). The influence of deceit on the validity of a legal act (can. 125 § 2 CIC). Prawo Kanoniczne, 60(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.21697/pk.2017.60.1.02

Cited by / Share

References

Źródła
Google Scholar

Codex Iuris Canonici autoritatae Joannis Pauli PP. II promulgatus, 25.01. 1983, AAS 75 (1983) pars II, s. 1-317; tekst polski, Kodeks Prawa Kanonicznego. Przekład polski zatwierdzony przez Konferencję Episkopatu, Poznań 1984.
Google Scholar

Codex Iuris Canonici Pii X Maximi iussu digestus Benediicti Papae XV auctoritatae promulgatus-25.01.1917, AAS 9 (1917) pars II, s. 1-593.
Google Scholar

Literatura
Google Scholar

AZNAR F., Comento al can. 125 CIC, w: Código de Derecho Canónico. Edición bilingüe comentada, red. L DE ECHEVERIA, Madrd 1985, s. 101-102.
Google Scholar

BAURA E., Il sistema delle invalidità (inexistenza e nullita; annullabilita e rescindibilità) dell’atto giuridico, w: L’atto giuridico nel diritto canonico, Città del Vaticano 2002, s. 121-142.
Google Scholar

BAURA E., Parte generale del diritto canonico. Diritto e sistema normativo, Roma 2012.
Google Scholar

L. CHIAPPETTA, ll Codice di Diritto Canonico. Commento giuridco- pastorale, t. 1, Roma 1996.
Google Scholar

D’ARENZO M., L’obbligo di riparazione del danno in diritto canonico, Cosenza 2013.
Google Scholar

D’AURIA A., Inganno, frode, deliberazione, Roma 2004.
Google Scholar

DE PAOLIS V., D’AURIA A., Le norme generali di Diritto Canonico. Commento al Codice di Diritto Canonico, Roma 2008.
Google Scholar

FALCHI F., I vizi della volontá: l’errore (can. 126 CIC) ed il dolo (can. 125 § 2 CIC), w: L’atto giuridico nel diritto canonico, Città del Vaticano 2002, s 201-230.
Google Scholar

FIJAŁKOWSKA E., Dolus, w: Leksykon tradycji rzymskiej prawa prywatnego. Podstawowe pojęcia, red. A. DĘBIŃSKI, M. JOŃCA, Warszawa 2016, s. 122-123.
Google Scholar

GARCÍA MARTÍN J., Le norme generali del Codex Iuris Canonici, Roma 1999.
Google Scholar

MICHIELS G., Principia generalia de personis in Ecclesia, Parissis-Tornaci-Romae 19552.
Google Scholar

MOSCARELLO G., «Error qui versetur circa id quo substantiam actus constituit» (can. 126), Roma 2001.
Google Scholar

PINTO P., De normis generalibus, w: Commento al Codice di Diritto Canonico, red. P. PINTO, Città del Vaticano 2001, s. 1 - 109.
Google Scholar

PREE H., Allgemeine Normen, w: Münsterischer Kommentar zum Codex Iuris Canonici, red. K. LÜDICKE, t. 1, Essen 1985, ad 125.
Google Scholar

REGATILLO E., Institutiones iuris canonici, t. 1, Santander 1961.
Google Scholar

RODRÍGUEZ CHACÓN R., Dolo, w: Diccionario general de Derecho Canónico, red. J. OTADUY, A. VIANA, J. SEDANO, t. 3, Pamplona 2012, s. 461-465.
Google Scholar

SOBAŃSKI R., Komentarz do kan. 125 KPK, w: J. KRUKOWSKI, R. SOBAŃSKI, Komentarz do Kodeksu Prawa Kanonicznego, t. 1, Poznań 2003, s. 204-206.
Google Scholar

SYRYJCZYK J., Sankcje w Kościele. Część ogólna komentarz, Warszawa 2008.
Google Scholar

THÉRIAULD M., Comento al can. 125 CIC, w: Comentario exegético al Código de Derecho Canónico, red. A. MARZOA, J. MIRAS, R. RODRÍGUEZ-OCAÑA, t. 1, Pamplona 1996, s. 826-829.
Google Scholar

URRUTIA F., De normis generalibus.Adnotationes in Codicem: Liber I, Romae 1983.
Google Scholar

VALDRINI P., Communità, persone governo. Lezioni sui libri I e II del CIC 1983, Roma 2013.
Google Scholar

WERNZ F., VIDAL P., Ius Canonicum, t. 2, Romae 1923.
Google Scholar

WOLF L., Dolo, w: Diccionario enciclopédico de Derecho Canónico, red. S. HAERING, H. SCHMITZ, tłum. H. BERNET, Barcelona 2008, s. 331-332.
Google Scholar

GINTER DZIERŻON

redakcjapk@uksw.edu.pl

Affiliation:

Faculty of Canon Law, Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw Poland

Bio Statement (e.g., department and rank)

Fr. prof. dr hab. Ginter Dzierżon - full professor, head of the Department of Theory and General Norms of Canon Law at the Faculty of Canon Law of the UKSW. The author of over 100 scientific studies in the field of matrimonial law, general norms of canon law and legal theory. Member of Consociatio Internationalis Iuris Canonici Promovendo (Rome and the Association of Polish Canonists).