The Principle of Non-Intervention in Southeast Asia: ASEAN’s Approach

Piotr Uhma

doi:10.21697/2025.14.1.05

Published: 2025-08-30

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)

The Principle of Non-Intervention in Southeast Asia: ASEAN’s Approach

Piotr Uhma

Polish Review of International and European Law

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/2025.14.1.05

Abstract

One of the most compelling reasons to study international law is its regional dimension - the way in which the universal principles of this legal framework are interpreted, adapted, and implemented across different parts of the world. Although international law aspires to universality, in practice it often reflects local legal traditions, historical circumstances, cultural values, and the political realities of individual regions. It is precisely these regional approaches that reveal the intricate balance between sovereignty and interdependence, between universal norms and local identities.

Keywords:

Non-intervention, ASEAN, Sovereignty

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Uhma, P. (2025). The Principle of Non-Intervention in Southeast Asia: ASEAN’s Approach. Polish Review of International and European Law, 14(1), 191–233. https://doi.org/10.21697/2025.14.1.05

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Acharya, Amitav. Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2009.
Google Scholar

Acharya, Amitav. „Asia Is Not One.” The Journal of Asian Studies 69, no. 4 (November 2010): 1001–1013. The Association for Asian Studies, Inc.
Google Scholar

African Union. Charter of the Organization of African Unity (1963). Accessed September 22, 2025. https://www.au.int/web/sites/default/files/treaties/7759-file-oau_charter_1963.pdf
Google Scholar

AICHR. Terms of Reference of the ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR). Accessed September 22, 2025. https://aichr.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/TOR-of-AICHR.pdf.
Google Scholar

Aloupi, Niki. "The Right to Non-Intervention and Non-Interference." Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 4 (2015).
Google Scholar

Anand, R. P. „Universality of International Law: An Asian Perspective.” In Essays in International Law, 38. New Delhi: Asian–African Legal Consultative Organization, 2007. https://www.aalco.int/RP%20Anand2007.pdf.
Google Scholar

Anghie, Antony. „The Evolution of International Law: Colonial and Postcolonial Realities.” Third World Quarterly 27, no. 5 (2006): 739–753.
Google Scholar

Antolik, Michael. ASEAN and the Diplomacy of Accommodation. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1990.
Google Scholar

Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), Merits. Judgment of 19 December 2005, [2005] I.C.J. Rep. 168.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. Zone of Peace, Freedom and Neutrality Declaration. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, November 27, 1971.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. February 24, 1976.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. The Declaration of ASEAN Concord. Bali, Indonesia, February 24, 1976.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. Declaration of ASEAN Concord II (Bali Concord II). October 7, 2003.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. Charter of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. December 15, 2008.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. Bali Declaration on ASEAN Community in a Global Community of Nations (Bali Concord III). November 17, 2011.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. Kuala Lumpur Declaration on the 10th Anniversary of the Establishment of the ASEAN Community. May 26, 2025.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. ASEAN and the Growth of Regional Cooperation in Southeast Asia by Rodolfo C. Severino Jr. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://asean.org/asean-and-the-growth-of-regional-cooperation-in-southeast-asia-by-rodolfo-c-severino-jr/.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. ASEAN Charter (2008). Accessed September 22, 2025. https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. ASEAN Human Rights Declaration. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://asean.org/asean-human-rights-declaration/.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. About Us. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://asean.org/about-us/.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. Major Sectoral Bodies & Committees. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://asean.org/major-sectoral-bodies-committees-2/.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. Phnom Penh Statement on the Adoption of the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration (AHRD). Accessed September 22, 2025. https://asean.org/phnom-penh-statement-on-the-adoption-of-the-asean-human-rights-declaration-ahrd/.
Google Scholar

ASEAN. The ASEAN Agreement on Disaster Management and Emergency Response. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://agreement.asean.org/media/download/20140117154159.pdf.
Google Scholar

Barron, Patrick, Erman Rahmant, and Kharisma Nugroho. The Contested Corners of Asia: Subnational Conflict and International Development Assistance — The Case of Aceh, Indonesia. San Francisco: The Asia Foundation, 2013. https://asiafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/The-Contested-Corners-of-Asia_The-Case-of-Aceh.pdf.
Google Scholar

Behrens, Paul. Diplomatic Interference and the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Google Scholar

Bell, Duncan. Under an Empty Sky: Realism and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023.
Google Scholar

Cambridge Dictionary. “English Dictionary.” Accessed September 22, 2025. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/.
Google Scholar

Carrai, Maria Adele. Sovereignty in China: A Genealogy of a Concept Since 1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
Google Scholar

China Consulate in Surabaya. Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin Meets with ASEAN Secretary-General Le Luong Minh. Accessed September 22, 2025. http://surabaya.china-consulate.gov.cn/eng/jrzg_2/201607/t20160707_5332028.htm.
Google Scholar

Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. Theories and Theoretical Research. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://en.icc.org.cn/thinktank_theories/theoretical_research/350.html.
Google Scholar

Cooper, Robert. „The New Liberal Imperialism.” The Guardian, April 7, 2002. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/apr/07/1.
Google Scholar

Cooper, Robert. The Breaking of Nations: Order and Chaos in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Grove Press, 2003.
Google Scholar

Cottiero, Christina, and Stephan, Haggard. „The Rise of Authoritarian Regional International Organizations.” IGCC Working Paper No. 1, 2021. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1360q3g4.
Google Scholar

Cottiero, Christina, and Stephan, Haggard. The Post-Modern State and the World Order. London: Demos, 2000.
Google Scholar

Corfu Channel (United Kingdom v. Albania), Merits, Judgment of 9 April 1949, [1949] I.C.J. Rep. 4.
Google Scholar

Czaputowicz, Jacek. Suwerenność. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2013.
Google Scholar

Czaputowicz, Jacek. Teorie stosunków międzynarodowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2022.
Google Scholar

Deinla, Imelda. The Development of the Rule of Law in ASEAN: The State and Regional Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.
Google Scholar

D'Amato, Anthony. „Trashing Customary International Law.” American Journal of International Law 81 (1987): 101–106.
Google Scholar

Domagała, Arkadiusz. Od interwencji humanitarnej do odpowiedzialności za ochronę. Społeczność międzynarodowa wobec wymuszania przestrzegania praw człowieka. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2016.
Google Scholar

Dupont, Alan. „ASEAN's Response to the East Timor Crisis.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 54, no. 2 (2000): 163–170.
Google Scholar

Emmerson, Donald K. „Security, Community, and Democracy in Southeast Asia: Analyzing ASEAN.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 6, no. 2 (2005): 165–185.
Google Scholar

Esquerra, Christian V., and TJ Burgonio. „Philippines, MILF Sign Landmark Peace Deal.” Philippine Daily Inquirer, March 27, 2014.
Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom. „The State of Sovereignty in Southeast Asia.” University of Chicago Law School Faculty Scholarship, 2005. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/journal_articles/1633/.
Google Scholar

Huck, Winfried. „Informal International Law-Making in the ASEAN: Consensus, Informality and Accountability.” Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht (ZaöRV) 80 (2020): 261–290.
Google Scholar

Irrawaddy. Myanmar Junta Opposes Timor-Leste’s ASEAN Membership. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-junta-opposes-timor-lestes-asean-membership.html.
Google Scholar

Irvine, David. „Making Haste Slowly: ASEAN from 1975.” In Understanding ASEAN, edited by Alison Broinowski, 40. London: Macmillan, 1982.
Google Scholar

Jamnejad, Maziar, and Michael Wood. „The Principle of Non-Intervention.” Leiden Journal of International Law 22 (2009): 345–381.
Google Scholar

Jayakumar, S. „Non-Interference in the Affairs of Another Country Was... the Key Factor as to Why No Military Conflict Had Broken Out Between Any Two Member States since 1967.” The Straits Times, July 25, 1997.
Google Scholar

Jennings, Robert Y., and Watts, Arthur, eds. Oppenheim’s International Law. 9th ed. 2 vols. London: Longman, 1992.
Google Scholar

Jones, Lee. ASEAN, Sovereignty and Intervention in Southeast Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
Google Scholar

Jorgensen-Dahl, Arnfinn. Regional Organization and Order in Southeast Asia. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1982.
Google Scholar

Kingston, Jeff. Nationalism in Asia: A History Since 1945. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2016.
Google Scholar

Kłodkowski, Piotr. Azjatycka wielka gra: Indie i Azja Południowa w sporze o regionalną i globalną dominację w XX i XXI wieku. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2024.
Google Scholar

Kwiecień, Roman. Teoria i filozofia prawa międzynarodowego: Problemy wybrane. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer, 2011.
Google Scholar

Kwiecień, Roman. „Hegemonializm v. pluralizm społeczności państw a jedność i powszechność prawa międzynarodowego.’ In Rozwój prawa międzynarodowego. Jedność czy fragmentacja?, edited by Jan Kolasa and Andrzej Kozłowski. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, 2007.
Google Scholar

Lengeling, Isabelle. „‘(Non-)Intervention Is Always for Someone and for Some Purpose’: A Critical Theory Analysis on the Principle of Non-Interference within ASEAN.” Student Paper Series (IBEI). Treballs de l'Institut Barcelona d'Estudis Internacionals (IBEI), n.d. https://repositori.upf.edu/items/a84a6dfc-861d-4e58-a00b-dbdf243915f2.
Google Scholar

Manchester University Library. Judge Xue Hanqin – Speaker Notes. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://www.library.manchester.ac.uk/media/services/library/usingthelibrary/servicesweprovide/digitisation/Judge-Xue-speaker-notes.pdf.
Google Scholar

Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), Merits. Judgment of 27 June 1986, [1986] I.C.J. Rep. 14.
Google Scholar

Mik, Cezary. Fenomenologia regionalnej integracji państw. Studium prawa międzynarodowego. Tom II: Regionalne organizacje integracji państw z perspektywy analitycznej prawa międzynarodowego. Warszawa: C.H. Beck, n.d.
Google Scholar

Muzaffar, Chandra. „The Peace Agreement between the Philippine Government and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front: Significance and Challenges.” Third World Resurgence 264–265 (2012): 5–8.
Google Scholar

MyASEAN2025. 46th ASEAN Summit Retreat (26 May 2025). Accessed September 22, 2025. https://myasean2025.my/46th-asean-summit-retreat-26-may-2025/.
Google Scholar

Narine, Shaun. Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2002.
Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André. „Universality.’ In Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law. Oxford Public International Law. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1497.
Google Scholar

Na Thalang, Chanintira. „Resolving the Conflict in Thailand’s Southern Border Provinces: Contentions between Upholding State Authority and Human Rights within the ASEAN Context.” Journal of International Peacekeeping 26, no. 2–3 (2023): 129–154.
Google Scholar

Nehru, Jawaharlal. „India Quarterly.” India Quarterly 41, no. 1 (January–March 1985): 74–100.
Google Scholar

Nguyen, Tram-Anh. „Norm or Necessity? The Non-Interference Principle in ASEAN.” Cornell International Affairs Review 9, no. 1 (Fall 2015): 30–42.
Google Scholar

Nollkaemper, André. „Universality.” In Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law. Oxford Public International Law. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1497
Google Scholar

Organization of American States. Charter of the Organization of American States. Accessed September 22, 2025. http://www.oas.org/en/sla/dil/inter_american_treaties_A-41_charter_OAS.asp.
Google Scholar

OSCE. The Helsinki Final Act. Accessed September 22, 2025. http://www.osce.org/helsinki-final-act.
Google Scholar

Peacekeeping United Nations. Chronology of UNTAET in East Timor. Accessed September 22, 2025. https://peacekeeping.un.org/mission/past/etimor/Untaetchrono.html.
Google Scholar

Ramcharan, Robin. „ASEAN and Non-Interference: A Principle Maintained.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 22, no. 1 (2000): 60–88.
Google Scholar

Ririhena, Yohanna. „RI Calls for Restoration of Democracy in Thailand.” The Jakarta Post, May 24, 2014. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/05/24/ri-calls-restoration-democracy-thailand.html.
Google Scholar

Rupprecht, Katja. „Separatist Conflicts in the ASEAN Region: Comparing Southern Thailand and Mindanao.” ASEAS – Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies 7, no. 1 (2014): 29–48.
Google Scholar

Schreuer, Christoph. „Regionalism v. Universalism.” European Journal of International Law 6 (1995): 477–499.
Google Scholar

Seo, Junsu. „Erosion of Democracy in Thailand and Myanmar.” Obrana a strategie 23, no. 2 (2023): 45–60.
Google Scholar

Simma, Bruno. „Universality of International Law from the Perspective of a Practitioner.” European Journal of International Law 20, no. 2 (2009): 265–297.
Google Scholar

Southgate, Laura. ASEAN Resistance to Sovereignty Violation: Interests, Balancing and the Role of the Vanguard State. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2019.
Google Scholar

Suzuki, Sanae. „Why is ASEAN Not Intrusive? Non-Interference Meets State Strength.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 8, no. 2 (2019): 199–218.
Google Scholar

Southgate, Laura. ASEAN Resistance to Sovereignty Violation: Interests, Balancing and the Role of the Vanguard State. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2019.
Google Scholar

Tang, Shuiling. „A Case Study of Separatist Movement in Thailand: South Thailand Insurgency.” Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Studies 7, no. 1 (2025): 106–112.
Google Scholar

Tene, R. M. Michael. ASEAN Five-Point Consensus on Myanmar. Singapore: S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, 2024. https://rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/CO24106.pdf.
Google Scholar

Usuluddin, Fachruddin, Pujo Widodo, and Barik Ali Amiruddin. „A Common Threat Analysis of Intergovernmental Policy Convergence in the Framework of Regional Integration: A Case Study of the ASEAN Strategic Partnership ‘Our Eyes’.” Journal Hubungan Internasional 8, no. 2 (2020): 143–159.
Google Scholar

United Nations. Charter of the United Nations. Accessed September 22, 2025. http://www.un.org/en/sections/un-charter/un-charter-full-text/.
Google Scholar

United Nations. Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. UN General Assembly Resolution 2625 (XXV), October 24, 1970.
Google Scholar

United Nations. UN Security Council Resolution 1264. S/RES/1264, September 15, 1999.
Google Scholar

United Nations. Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. Done at Vienna, April 18, 1961. United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 500.
Google Scholar

Wilson Center Digital Archive. Document: Conversations Between Foreign Ministers of the Soviet Union and Indonesia (1960). Accessed September 22, 2025. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/123891.
Google Scholar