Commission Opens Infringement Procedure against Hungary concerning its Asylum Law, EU Commission, press release IP/15/6228, 10.12.2015.
Google Scholar

Conrelisse G., Reneman M., “Border Procedures in the Commission’s New Pact on Migration and Asylum: A Case of Politics outplaying Rationality?”, European Law Journal, vol. 26 (2020): 181-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12382
Google Scholar

Cornelisse G., “The Pact and Detention: An Empty Promise of ‘Certainty, Clarity and Decent Conditions’”, 2021, https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/the-pact-and-detention-an-empty-promise-of-certainty-clarity-and-decent-conditions/ (accessed 28.09.2021).
Google Scholar

Den Heijer M., “Coercion, Prohibition and Great Expectations. The Continuing Failure of the Common European Asylum System”, Common Market Law Revier, no 53 (2016): 607-647. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2016059
Google Scholar

Dózsa D., Menkes M.J., “Somewhere between Poland and Germany – The Hungarian Constitutional Court’s Ruling in the Refugee Push-Back Case”, “EU Law Live”, https://eulawlive.com/op-ed-somewhere-between-poland-and-germany-the-hungarian-constitutional-courts-ruling-in-the-refugee-push-back-case-by-daniel-dozsa-and-marcin-j-menkes/ (accessed 22.12.2021).
Google Scholar

Immigration Detention in Hungary: Transit Zone or Twilight Zone?, Global Detention Project 2020.
Google Scholar

Inotai E., “Pandemic Hit Hungary Harps on About ‘Migrant Crisis’”, Reporting Democracy (2020).
Google Scholar

Lang I. G., Nagy B., “External Border Control Techniques in the EU as a Challenge to the Principle of Non-Refoulement”, European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 17, no. 3 (2021): 442-470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000249
Google Scholar

Progin-Theuerkauf S., “Defining the Boundaries of the Future Common European Asylum System with the Help of Hungary?”, European Papers, vol. 6, no. 1 (2021): 7-15.
Google Scholar