The (still) Unresolved Question of COVID-19 Passes Compatibility with the ECHR. Comments on the ECtHR Decision of 7 October 2021 in Zembrano v. France (Application no. 41994/21)

Julia Kapelańska-Pręgowska

doi:10.21697/2022.11.1.07

Opublikowane: 2022-06-30

Tom 11 Nr 1 (2022)

The (still) Unresolved Question of COVID-19 Passes Compatibility with the ECHR. Comments on the ECtHR Decision of 7 October 2021 in Zembrano v. France (Application no. 41994/21)

Julia Kapelańska-Pręgowska

Polish Review of International and European Law

Dział: Case comments

https://doi.org/10.21697/2022.11.1.07

Abstrakt

This article analyses the question of compatibility of COVID-19 passes with the European Convention of Human Rights. The present commentary’s point of reference is the European Court of Human Rights inadmissibility decision in Zembrano v. France. Nevertheless, the main focus is not given to the admissibility criteria but to the more general considerations concerning restrictions of individual rights and freedoms introduced in the context of the current pandemic. The article offers some insights into the necessity and proportionality of an interference (the COVID-19 pass requirement). It also discusses if such measures are discriminatory or not

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Kapelańska-Pręgowska, J. (2022). The (still) Unresolved Question of COVID-19 Passes Compatibility with the ECHR. Comments on the ECtHR Decision of 7 October 2021 in Zembrano v. France (Application no. 41994/21) . Polish Review of International and European Law, 11(1), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.21697/2022.11.1.07

Cited by / Share

Bibliografia

Arai, Y. (2001) The Margin of Appreciation Doctrine and the Principle of Proportionality in the Jurisprudence of the ECHR, Antwerp/Oxford/New York: Intersentia.
Google Scholar

Bivolaru v. Romania, appl. no. 28796/04, Judgement of 28 February 2017.
Google Scholar

Centrum för Rättvisa v. Sweden [GC], Application no. 35252/08, Judgement of 25 May 2021.
Google Scholar

Communaute genevoise d'action syndicale (CGAS) v. Switzerland, appl. no. 21881/20, Judgement of 15 March 2022.
Google Scholar

Cope, K., Stremitzer A., “Governments Are Constitutionally Permitted to Provide “Vaccine Passports”— Some May Also Be Constitutionally Obligated to Do So”, Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 62(6), June 2021: 771-772, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262434
Google Scholar

Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights, Practical Guide on Admissibility Criteria, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Admissibility_guide_ENG.pdf (accessed 4.1.2022).
Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights and on Article 1 of Protocol No. 12 to the Convention, 2021, https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art_14_Art_1_Protocol_12_ENG.pdf (accessed 13.3.2022).
Google Scholar

General comment no. 18, Non-discrimination, 21 November 1989, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.1.
Google Scholar

Giubilini, A., Minerva F., Schuklenk U., Savulescu J., “The ‘Ethical’ COVID-19 Vaccine is the One that Preserves Lives: Religious and Moral Beliefs on the COVID-19 Vaccine”, Public Health Ethics, vol. 14, Issue 3 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phab018
Google Scholar

Green Pass: Which Countries in Europe Require a COVID Vaccine Pass to Get Around?, https://www.euronews.com/travel/2021/10/12/green-pass-which-countries-in-europe-do-you-need-one-for (accessed 10.2.2022).
Google Scholar

Harris, D.J., O’Boyle M., Bates E.P., Buckley C.M. (2014), Law of the European Convention on Human Rights, OUP, 3rd ed. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199606399.003.0001
Google Scholar

Jaskiernia, Jerzy, “Challenges Posed by the COVID-19 Pandemic to the Protection of Human Rights”, Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations, no. 4(56) (2002), DOI: 10.7366/020909614202004.
Google Scholar

Kalfagiannis and Pospert v. Greece, Application no. 74435/14, Decision of 9 June 2020.
Google Scholar

Kapelańska-Pręgowska, J. Inadequate State Response to Protect Life and Health in Times of COVID-19 as a Violation of Human Rights Obligations – the Example of Poland, 2022 EJIL: Talk!, https://www.ejiltalk.org/inadequate-state-response-to-protect-life-and-health-in-times-of-covid-19-as-a-violation-of-human-rights-obligations-the-example-of-poland/ (accessed 3.3.2022).
Google Scholar

Kudła v. Poland, Application no. 30210/96, Judgement of 26 October 2000.
Google Scholar

Milanović M., “Covid Passes and Non-Discrimination", https://www.ejiltalk.org/covid-passes-and-non-discrimination/ (accessed 30.12.2021);
Google Scholar

Miroļubovs and Others v. Latvia, Application no. 798/05, Judgement of 15 September 2009.
Google Scholar

Pretty v. the United Kingdom, Application no. 2346/02, Judgement of 29 April 2002.
Google Scholar

Nawrot, O., Nawrot J., Vachev V., (2022) “The Right to Healthcare during the Covid-19 Pandemic under the European Convention on Human Rights”, The International Journal of Human Rights, DOI: 10.1080/13642987.2022.2027760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2027760
Google Scholar

Roman Zakharov v. Russia [GC], Application no. 47143/06, Judgement of 4 December 2015.
Google Scholar

S.A.S. v. France [GC], Application no. 43835/11, Judgement of 1 July 2014.
Google Scholar

Schabas, W. A. (2015) The European Convention on Human Rights. A Commentary, Oxford: OUP.
Google Scholar

Tacik, P. “The Blizzard of the World: COVID-19 and the Last Say of the State of Exception”, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica, vol. 96 (2021). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.96.02
Google Scholar

Terhes v. Romania, application no. 4933/20, decision of 20 May 2021.
Google Scholar

Toromag, s.r.o. v. Slovakia, Application no. 41217/20 and four other applications, communicated on 5 December 2020.
Google Scholar

Which Countries in Europe Will Follow Austria and Make COVID Vaccines Mandatory?, https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2022/02/01/are-countries-in-europe-are-moving-towards-mandatory-vaccination (accessed 10.2.2022).
Google Scholar

Zhdanov and Others v. Russia, Application nos. 12200/08, 35949/11, 58282/12, Judgement of 16 July 2019.
Google Scholar

Zwaan-de Vries v. The Netherlands, communication no. 182/1984, Views of 9 April 1987, CCPR/C/29/D/182/1984.
Google Scholar

Zweig, S. A., Zapf A. J., Beyrer Ch., Guha-Sapir D., Haar R. J., “Ensuring Rights while Protecting Health: The Importance of Using a Human Rights Approach in Implementing Public Health Response to COVID-19”, Health and Human Rights Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, December 2021.
Google Scholar