A joke for you, a status-boost for men: Men's tendency to tell affiliative jokes is related to their self-promotion style

Łukasz Jach; Gabriela Pietrzak

doi:10.21697/sp.2022.22.1.03

Published: 2022-12-31

Vol. 22 No. 1 (2022)

A joke for you, a status-boost for men: Men's tendency to tell affiliative jokes is related to their self-promotion style

Łukasz Jach , Gabriela Pietrzak

Studia Psychologica: Theoria et praxis

Section: Empirical Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2022.22.1.03

Abstract

A sense of humor is a desirable characteristic in both romantic and platonic relationships, and people communicate their sense of humor by telling jokes. However, there are sex differences in joking, so men tell jokes more often than women. Men’s benefits from joking correspond with such fundamental social motives, as mate seeking and mate retention, affiliation, and self-protection. However, less is known about the relation between tendency to tell jokes and more general styles of self-presentation, that is, tactical ways of behaving that can be used in many social interactions. In our study (N = 139 Polish men aged 18 to 60 [M = 29.94, SD = 11.66]), we wanted to examine the relationships between self-presentation styles (e.g., self-promotion and self-depreciation), humor styles (e.g., affiliative, self-enhancing, aggressive, and self-defeating), and tendency to tell jokes in adult men. We found that men focused on self-promotion produced humor more often and their humor styles contained more affiliative and self-enhancement aspects. Moreover, men's use of affiliative humor completely mediated the relationship between their self-promotion and their tendency to joke. We also found that men oriented on self-depreciation use more self-defeating humor, but their self-defeating motivation does not correlate with their tendency to joke. Our results suggest that men may tell jokes, especially those involving affiliative humor, to tactically achieve their self-promotion goals.

Keywords:

humor styles, jokes, public image, self-presentation, social status

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Jach, Łukasz, & Pietrzak, G. (2022). A joke for you, a status-boost for men: Men’s tendency to tell affiliative jokes is related to their self-promotion style. Studia Psychologica: Theoria Et Praxis, 22(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2022.22.1.03

Cited by / Share

References

Barel, E. (2019). The effects of mating cues and intrasexual competition on humor production. Psychology, 10, 320-335. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2019.103023
Google Scholar

Brauer, K., & Proyer, R.T. (2021). Sex differences in attractiveness of humor. In T.K. Shackelford, & V.A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 7091–7094). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_3245
Google Scholar

Buss, D.M., Gomes, M., Higgins, D.S., & Lauterbach, K. (1987). Tactics of manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1219-1229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1219
Google Scholar

Chapais, B. (2017). Psychological adaptations and the production of culturally polymorphic social universals. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 11, 63-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000079
Google Scholar

Chen, H., Wang, L., & Bao, J. (2022). Why does leader aggressive humor lead to bystander workplace withdrawal behavior?-Based on the dual path perspective of cognition- affection. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 925029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925029
Google Scholar

Cheng, J.T., Tracy, J.L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenue to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030398
Google Scholar

Cialdini, R.B. (2007). Influence: the psychology of persuasion. New York: Harper Collins.
Google Scholar

Curry, O.S., & Dunbar, R.I.M. (2006). Sharing a joke: The effects of a similar sense of humor on affiliation and altruism. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34, 125-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.11.003
Google Scholar

DiCioccio, R.L. (2012). Humor as aggressive communication. In R.L. DiCioccio (Ed.), Humor communication: Theory, impact, and outcomes (pp. 93- 108). Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
Google Scholar

Doliński, D. (2016). Techniques of social influence. The psychology of gaining compliance. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315746876
Google Scholar

Exline, J.J., Zell, A.L., & Lobel, M. (2013), Sidestepping awkward encounters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 706-720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2013.01047.x
Google Scholar

Flamson, T., & Barrett, H.C. (2008). The encryption theory of humor: A knowledge-based mechanism of honest signaling. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 261-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.6.2008.4.2
Google Scholar

Ford, T.E., Lappi, S.K., O’Connor, E.C., & Banos, N C. (2017). Manipulating humor styles: Engaging in self-enhancing humor reduces state anxiety. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 30, 169191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humor-2016-0113
Google Scholar

Gallup, G.G., Ampel, B.C., Wedberg, N., & Pogosjan, A. (2014). Do Orgasms Give Women Feedback about Mate Choice?. Evolutionary Psychology, 12, 958-978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491401200507
Google Scholar

Greengross, G., & Miller, G. (2011). Humor ability reveals intelligence, predicts mating success, and is higher in males. Intelligence, 39, 188–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.006
Google Scholar

Greengross, G., Silva, P.J., & Nusbaum, E.C. (2020). Sex differences in humor production ability: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 84, 103886. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103886
Google Scholar

Guéguen, N. (2010). Men’s sense of humor and women’s responses to courtship solicitations: an experimental field study. Psychological Reports, 107, 145-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/07.17.PR0.107.4.145-156
Google Scholar

Guéguen, N., Martin, A., & Meineri, S. (2011) Similarity and Social Interaction: When Similarity Fosters Implicit Behavior Toward a Stranger, The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 671-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2010.522627
Google Scholar

Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F.J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22, 165-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
Google Scholar

Hone, L.E., Hurwitz, W., & Lieberman, D. (2015). Sex differences in preferences for humor: A replication, modification, and extension. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 167-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491501300110
Google Scholar

Hornowska, E., & Charytonik, J. (2011). Polska adaptacja Kwestionariusza Stylów Humoru (HSQ) R. Martina, P. Puhlik-Doris, G. Larsena, J. Gray i K. Weir [Polish adaptation of the Humor Styles Questionnaire (HSQ) by R. Martin, P. Puhlik-Doris, G. Larsen, J. Gray, and K. Weir]. Studia Psychologiczne, 49, 5-22.
Google Scholar

Howrigan, D.P., & MacDonald, K.B. (2008). Humor as a Mental Fitness Indicator. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 652-666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600411
Google Scholar

Hunter, S.C., Fox, C.L., & Jones, S.E. (2016). Humor style similarity and difference in friendship dyads. Journal of Adolescence, 46, 30-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.015
Google Scholar

Hurley, M.M., Dennett, D.C., Adams, R.B. (2011). Inside Jokes: Using Humor to Reverse-Engineer the Mind. The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9027.001.0001
Google Scholar

Jach, Ł., Kubicius, D., & Jonason, P.K. (2022). Do they fit together like the Joker and Harley Quinn?”: Joking, laughing, humor styles, and dyadic adjustment among people in long-term romantic relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 199, 111859. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111859
Google Scholar

Janes, L.M., & Olson, J.M. (2000). Jeer pressure: the behavioral effects of observing ridicule of others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 474–485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266006
Google Scholar

Jonason, P.K., & Webster, G.D. (2012). A protean approach to social influence: Dark Triad personalities and social influence tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 521-526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.11.023
Google Scholar

Kenrick, D.T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S.L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 292-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610369469
Google Scholar

Kfrerer, M.L., Schermer, J.A. (2020). Humor styles and the ten personality dimensions from the Supernumerary Personality Inventory. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8, 352-360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2020.101187
Google Scholar

Kim, M. (2014). Why self-deprecating? Achieving ‘oneness’ in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 69, 82-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.03.004
Google Scholar

Kuiper, N.A., Martin R.A., & Olinger, L.J. (1993). Coping humor, stress, and cognitive appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science,25, 81-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078791
Google Scholar

Laursen, B. (2017). Making and keeping friends: The importance of being similar. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 282–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12246
Google Scholar

Leary, M.R. (1996). Self-Presentation: Impression Management and Interpersonal Behavior (1st ed.). Routledge.
Google Scholar

Leary, M.R., & Kowalski, R.M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34
Google Scholar

Li, N.P., Griskevicius, V., Durante, K.M., Jonason, P.K., Pasisz, D.J., & Aumer, K. (2009). An evolutionary perspective on humor: sexual selection or interest indication?. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 923-936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209334786
Google Scholar

Martin, R.A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(1), 48–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00534-2
Google Scholar

Maxwell, S.E., & Cole, D.A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12, 23-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23
Google Scholar

Neel, R., Kenrick, D.T., White, A.E., & Neuberg, S.L. (2016). Individual differences in fundamental social motives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 887907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/t51742-000
Google Scholar

Ozyesil, Z. (2012). The Prediction Level of Self-Esteem on Humor Style and Positive-Negative Affect. Psychology, 3, 638-641. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.38098
Google Scholar

Pick, C.M., Ko, A., Kenrick, D.T., Wiezel, A., Wormley, A.S., Awad, E., Al-Shawaf, L., Barry, O., Bereby-Meyer, Y., Boonyasiriwat, W., Brandstätter, E., Ceylan-Batur, S., Choy, B.K.C., Crispim, A.C., Cruz, J. E., David, D., David, O. A., Defelipe, R.P., Elmas, P., Espinosa, A., … Varnum, M.E.W. (2022). Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves. Scientific Data, 9, 499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01579-w
Google Scholar

Speer, S.A. (2019). Reconsidering self-deprecation as a communication practice. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 806-828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12329
Google Scholar

Sprecher, S., & Regan, P.C. (2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407502019004048
Google Scholar

Stewart, P.A. (2011). The influence of self-and other-deprecatory humor on presidential candidate evaluation during the 2008 US election. Social Science Information, 50, 201-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0539018410396616
Google Scholar

Stieger, S., Formann, A.K, & Burger, C. (2011). Humor styles and their relationship to explicit and implicit self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 747-750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.11.025
Google Scholar

Stopa, L., Brown, M.A., Hirsch, C.R. (2012). The effects of repeated imagery practice on self-concept, anxiety and performance in socially anxious participants. Journal of Experimental Psychopathology, 3, 223-242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5127/jep.021511
Google Scholar

Van Vugt, M. (2006). Evolutionary origins of leadership and followership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 354-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_5
Google Scholar

Van Vugt, M., Hogan, R., & Kaiser, R.B. (2008). Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past. American Psychologist, 63, 182-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.182
Google Scholar

Von Rueden, C., Gurven, M., & Kaplan, H. (2011). Why do men seek status?; Fitness payoffs to dominance and prestige. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278, 2223-2232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.2145
Google Scholar

Wilbur, C.J., & Campbell, L. (2011). Humor in romantic contexts: Do men participate and women evaluate? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 918-929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405343
Google Scholar

Wojciszke, B., (2002). Autopromocja i autodeprecjacja: Kwestionariusz Stylów Autoprezentacji [Self-promotion and self-depreciation: Self-presentation Styles Questionnaire]. Psychologia Jakości Życia, 1, 145-171.
Google Scholar

Zeigler‐Hill, V., Besser, A., & Jett, S.E. (2013). Laughing at the looking glass: Does humor style serve as an interpersonal signal? Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 201-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100118
Google Scholar

Zhang, H., Xin, S. & Liu, G. (2022). The effect of the perception of group members’ identity diversity on intragroup trust. Current Psychology, 41, 2686–2696 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00720-5
Google Scholar

Łukasz Jach

lukasz.jach@us.edu.pl

Affiliation:

University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland Poland

Gabriela Pietrzak

Affiliation:

University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland Poland