Who uses Tinder?: The Dark Triad traits, attachment, and mate value

Peter Jonason; Rachel Bulyk

doi:10.21697/sp.2019.19.1.01

Published: 2019-01-01

Vol. 19 No. 1 (2019)

Who uses Tinder?: The Dark Triad traits, attachment, and mate value

Peter Jonason

, Rachel Bulyk

Studia Psychologica: Theoria et praxis

Section: Commentaries

https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2019.19.1.01

Abstract

Modern dating life has been changed with the advent of smartphone-based applications like Tinder. One way to identify who uses these applications is to compare the personality traits of users to non-users. In two brief studies (N = 581) we compared Tinder-users to non-users in individual differences associated with short-term mating (i.e., psychopathy, Machiavellianism, narcissism [the Dark Triad traits], and anxious attachment) and mate value. We revealed that the men who were Tinder users were especially high in psychopathy and narcissism and women who were Tinder users were especially high in anxious attachment and rated themselves as unsuccessful in finding relationship partners. While exploratory in nature, we suggest that men who are characterized by antisocial traits may use Tinder for opportunistic mating goals whereas women who have struggled to find relationships may use Tinder as a compensatory mating tactic.

Keywords:

tinder, psychopathy, narcissism, machiavellianism, attachment, mate value, sex differences

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Jonason, P., & Bulyk, R. (2019). Who uses Tinder?: The Dark Triad traits, attachment, and mate value. Studia Psychologica: Theoria Et Praxis, 19(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2019.19.1.01

Cited by / Share

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: Assessed in the strange situation and at home. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Aretz, W., Demuth, I., Schmidt, K., & Vierlein, J. (2010). Partner search in the digital age. Psychological characteristics of online-dating-service-users and its contribution to the explanation of different patterns of utilization. Journal of Business and Media Psychology, 1, 8–16.
Google Scholar

Batholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.
Google Scholar

Botnen, E. O., Bendixen, M., Grøntvedt, T. V., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2018). Individual differences in sociosexuality predicts picture-based mobile dating app use. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 67–73.
Google Scholar

Brennan, K. A., & Shaver, P. R. (1995). Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 21(3), 267–283.
Google Scholar

Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232.
Google Scholar

Carpenter, C. J., & McEwan, B. (2016). The players of micro-dating: Individual and gender differences in goal orientations toward micro-dating apps. First Monday, 21(5). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i5.6187
Google Scholar

Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Handbook of attachment. New York, NY: Guilford.
Google Scholar

Clemens, C., Atkins, D., & Krishnan, A. (2015). The influence of biological and personality traits on gratifications obtained through online dating websites. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 120–129.
Google Scholar

Daneback, K., Månsson, S. A., & Ross, M. (2007). Using the internet to find offline sex partners. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 100–107.
Google Scholar

Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2014, January). Social media update 2013. Retrieved March 12, 2019, from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/12/30/social-media-update-2013/
Google Scholar

Duguay, S. (2016). Dressing up Tinderella: Interrogating authenticity claims on the mobile dating app Tinder. Information, Communication & Society, 20(3), 1–17.
Google Scholar

Duncan, Z., & March, E. (2019). Using Tinder® to start a fire: Predicting antisocial use of Tinder® with gender and the Dark Tetrad. Personality and Individual Differences, 145, 9–14.
Google Scholar

Edlund, J. E., & Sagarin, B. J. (2010). Mate value and mate preferences: An investigation into decisions made with and without constraints. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(8), 835–839.
Google Scholar

Fisher, M., Cox, A., Bennett, S., & Gavric, D. (2008). Components of self-perceived mate value. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(4), 156–168.
Google Scholar

Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365.
Google Scholar

Gatter, K., & Hodkinson, K. (2016). On the differences between Tinder™ and online dating agencies: Questioning a myth. An exploratory study. Cogent Psychology, 3(1), 1–12.
Google Scholar

Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524.
Google Scholar

Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83.
Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., Betes, S. L., & Li, N. P. (in press). Solving mate shortages: Lowering standards, traveling farther, and abstaining. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences.
Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., Foster, J. D., McCain, J., & Campbell, W. K. (2015). Where birds flock to get together: The who, what, where, and why of mate searching. Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 76–84.
Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., Foster, J. D., Oshio, A., Sitnikova, M., Birkas, B., & Gouveia, V. (2017). Self-construals and the Dark Triad traits in six countries. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 120–124.
Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., Garcia, J., Webster, G. D., Li, N. P., & Fisher, H. (2015). Relationship dealbreakers: Traits people avoid in potential mates?. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 41(12), 1697–1711.
Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. W., Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The Dark Triad: Facilitating short-term mating in men. European Journal of Personality, 23(1), 5–18.
Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., Lyons, M., & Bethell, E. (2014). The making of Darth Vader: Parent-child care and the Dark Triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 30–34.
Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., Marsh, K., Dib, O., Plush, D., Doszpot, M., Fung, E., Crimmins, K., Drapski, M., & Di Pietro, K. (2019). Is smart sexy?: Examining the role of relative intelligence in mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 53–59.
Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., Valentine, K. A., Li, N. P., & Harbeson, C. L. (2011). Mate-selection and the Dark Triad: Facilitating a short-term mating strategy and creating a volatile environment. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6), 759–763.
Google Scholar

Jonason, P. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2018). The fundamental social motives that characterize dark personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 132, 98–107.
Google Scholar

Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41.
Google Scholar

Kim, M., Kwon, K., & Lee, M. (2009). Psychological characteristics of Internet dating service users: The effect of self-esteem, involvement, and sociability on the use of Internet dating services. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 445–449.
Google Scholar

Koehn, M. A., Okan, C., & Jonason, P. K. (2019). A primer on the Dark Triad traits. Australian Journal of Psychology, 71(1), 7–15.
Google Scholar

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49–74.
Google Scholar

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.
Google Scholar

Kruger, D. J., & Fisher, M. L. (2008). Women’s life history attributes are associated with preferences in mating relationships. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 289–302.
Google Scholar

Li, N. P. (2017). A multidimensional measure of self-reported mate-value [Unpublished manuscript]. Singapore Management University.
Google Scholar

March, E., Grieve, R., Marrington, J., & Jonason, P. K. (2017). Trolling on Tinder (and other dating apps): Examining the role of the Dark Tetrad and impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 139–143.
Google Scholar

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral activation system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Regan, P. C. (1998). What if you can’t get what you want?: Willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(12), 1294–1303.
Google Scholar

Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., Jr., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363.
Google Scholar

Sales, N. J. (2015, September). Tinder and the dawn of the “dating apocalypse”. Vanity Fair. Retrieved March 12, 2019, from http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2015/08/tinder-hook-up-culture-end-of-dating
Google Scholar

Schachner, D. A., & Shaver, P. R. (2004). Attachment dimensions and sexual motives. Personal Relationships, 11(2), 179–195.
Google Scholar

Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612.
Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P., & Jonason, P. K. (2015). Attachment and sexual permissiveness: Exploring differential associations across genders, cultures, and facets of short-term mating. Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 46, 119–133.
Google Scholar

Sevi, B. (2018). Tinder users are risk takers and have low sexual disgust sensitivity. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 104–108.
Google Scholar

Sevi, B. (2019). The dark side of Tinder: The Dark Triad of personality as correlates of Tinder use. Journal of Individual Differences. Advance online publication.
Google Scholar

Sevi, B., Aral, T., & Eskenazi, T. (2018). Exploring the hook-up app: Low sexual disgust and high sociosexuality predict motivation to use Tinder for casual sex. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 17–20.
Google Scholar

Shaver, P. R., & Brennan, K. A. (1992). Attachment styles and the ”Big Five” personality traits: Their connections with each other and with romantic relationship outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 536–545.
Google Scholar

Sprecher, S. (2013). Attachment style and sexual permissiveness: The moderating role of gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 55, 428–432.
Google Scholar

Sumter, S. R., Vandenbosch, L., & Ligtenberg, L. (2017). Love me Tinder: Untangling emerging adults’ motivations for using the dating application Tinder. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 67–78.
Google Scholar

Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017a). To Tinder or not to Tinder, that’s the question: An individual differences perspective to Tinder use and motives. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 74–79.
Google Scholar

Timmermans, E., & De Caluwé, E. (2017b). Development and validation of the Tinder Motives Scale (TMS). Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 341–350.
Google Scholar

Timmermans, E., De Caluwé, E., & Alexopoulos, C. (2018). Why are you cheating on Tinder?: Exploring users’ motives and (dark) personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 129–139.
Google Scholar

Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2007). Who visits online dating sites? Exploring some characteristics of online daters. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 849–852.
Google Scholar

Whitty, M. T., & Buchanan, T. (2009). Looking for love in so many places: Characteristics of online daters and speed daters. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 3, 63–86.
Google Scholar