Obrazkowy pomiar cech osobowości dzieci – prezentacja metody

Marta Rogoza

doi:10.21697/sp.2019.19.2.02

Published: 2019-08-01

Vol. 19 No. 2 (2019)

The Pictorial Personality Traits Quesionnaire – presentation of the questionnaire

Marta Rogoza

Studia Psychologica: Theoria et praxis

Section: Commentaries

https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2019.19.2.02

Abstract

Currently, it is assumed that the personality structure, including the period of the childhood, could be described through the means of the Big Five traits. A big challenge, however, is to select such a measure, which would take into account the development of reading, concentration, and other cognitive aspects, which are still developing in younger children. Therefore, the aim of the current study if to demonstrate that the Pictorial Personality Traits Questionnaire for Children (PPTQ-C), which is a questionnaire designed to capture five basic personality traits, that is: extraversion, neuroticism, openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness during the late childhood period. The PPTQ-C could be deemed as a valid and reliable tool, which covers the existing lack in such tools, especially for children aged between 7 and 10 years. The PPTQ-C combines the best features of questionnaire and non-questionnaire methods of assessment and is adjusted to the cognitive development of children.

Keywords:

personality traits, Big Five, childhood, PPTQ-C

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Rogoza, M. (2019). The Pictorial Personality Traits Quesionnaire – presentation of the questionnaire . Studia Psychologica: Theoria Et Praxis, 19(2), 25–54. https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2019.19.2.02

Cited by / Share

References

Ablow, J. C., Measelle, J. R. (1993). Berkeley Puppet Interview: administration and scoring system manuals. Berkeley: University of California. Pobrane z https://hostingfasr838.weebly.com/berkeley-puppet-interview-manual.html
Google Scholar

Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G., Rabasca, A., Pastorelli, C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 645–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00051-X
Google Scholar

Borgers, N., de Leeuw, E., Hox, J. J. (2000). Children as respondents in survey research: cognitive development and response quality. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology (BMS), 66, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/075910630006600106
Google Scholar

Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Google Scholar

Caspi, A., Roberts, B. W., Shiner, R. L. (2005). Personality development: stability and change. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 453–484. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141913
Google Scholar

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
Google Scholar

Chan, W., McCrae, R. R., De Fruyt, F., Jussim, L., Löckenhoff, C. E., De Bolle, M., …, Terracciano, A. (2012). Stereotypes of age differences in personality traits: Universal and accurate? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029712
Google Scholar

Cieciuch, J. (2010). Pięcioczynnikowa struktura osobowości we wczesnej adolescencji. Studia Psychologica, 10, 251–271.
Google Scholar

Cieciuch, J., Harasimczuk, J., Döring, A. K. (2010). Struktura wartości w późnym dzieciństwie. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 15(2), 33–45.
Google Scholar

Costa, P. T., Jr., McCrae, R. (1976). Age differences in personality structure: a cluster analytic approach. Journal of Gerontology, 31, 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/31.5.564
Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Google Scholar

Damon, W., Hart, D. (1982). The development of self-understanding from infancy through adolescence. Child Development, 53, 841–864. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129122
Google Scholar

De Bolle, M., De Fruyt, F., McCrae, R. R., Löckenhoff, C. E., Costa, P. T., Jr., Aguilar-Vafaie, M. E., …, Terracciano, A. (2015). The emergence of sex differences in personality traits in early adolescence: a cross-sectional, cross-cultural study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108, 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038497
Google Scholar

De Fruyt, F., Mervielde, I., Hoekstra, H., Rolland, J. (2000). Assessing adolescents’ personality with the NEO PI-R. Assessment, 7, 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319110000700403
Google Scholar

del Barrio, V., Carrasco, M. A., Holgado, F. P. (2006). Factor structure invariance in the children’s Big Five Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.3.158
Google Scholar

Döring, A. K., Blauensteiner, A., Aryus, K., Drögekamp, L., Bilsky, W. (2010). Assessing values at an early age: The Picture-Based Value Survey for Children. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.497423
Google Scholar

Hendriks, J., Perugini, M., Angleitner, A., Ostendorf, F., Johnson, J., De Fruyt, F.,… Ruisel, I. (2003). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory: crosscultural generalizability across 13 countries. European Journal of Personality, 17, 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.491
Google Scholar

Hershey, M., Hill, D. (1976). Positional response set in pre-adult socialization surveys. Social Science Quarterly, 56, 707–714. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42860424
Google Scholar

Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in. factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
Google Scholar

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computer to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
Google Scholar

Kielar-Turska, M., Białecka-Pikul, M., Skórska, A. (2006). Rozwój zdolności mentalizacji. Z badań nad związkiem teorii umysłu, sprawności językowych i funkcji zarządzającej. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 11(2), 35–47.
Google Scholar

Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Nowy Jork: The Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

Kohnstamm, G. A., Halverson, C. F., Mervielde, I., Avilla, V. (red.). (1998). The LEA Series in Personality and Clinical Psychology. Parental descriptions of child personality: developmental antecendents of the Big Five? Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar

Kołodziejczyk, A. (2011). Późne dzieciństwo – młodszy wiek szkolny. W: J. Trempała (red.), Psychologia rozwoju człowieka. Podręcznik akademicki (s. 235–258). Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Maćkiewicz, M., Cieciuch, J. (2012). Jak mierzyć cechy Wielkiej Piątki u dzieci? Prace nad Obrazkowym pomiarem cech osobowości dzieci (OPCO-D). Psychologia Rozwojowa, 17(3), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843879PR.12.019.0638
Google Scholar

Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big-Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019227
Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (2001). Trait psychology and culture: exploring intercultural comparisons. Journal of Personality, 69, 819–846. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.696166
Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R. (2002). Cross-cultural research on the five-factor model of personality cross-cultural research on the five-factor model of personality. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 4, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1038
Google Scholar

McCrae, R., Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509
Google Scholar

McCrae, R., Costa, P. T., Jr. (2005). Osobowość dorosłego człowieka. Perspektywa teorii pięcioczynnikowej. Kraków: WAM .
Google Scholar

McCrae, R., Terracciano, A., 78 współpacowników Personality Profiles of Cultures Project (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the
Google Scholar

observer’s perspective: data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547
Google Scholar

Measelle, J. R., Ablow, J. A., Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P. (1998). Assessing young children’s views of their academic, social, and emotional lives: an evaluation of the Berkeley Puppet Interview. Child Development, 69, 1556–1576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06177.x
Google Scholar

Measelle, J. R., John, O. P., Ablow, J. C., Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P. (2005). Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the Big Five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.90
Google Scholar

Mervielde, I., Asendorpf, J. B. (2000). Variable-centred and person-centred approaches to childhood personality. W: S. E. Hampson (red.), Advances in personality psychology (t. 1, s. 37–76). Londyn: Psychology Press.
Google Scholar

Mervielde, I., De Fruyt, F. (1999). Construction of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPICS). W: I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, F. Ostendorf (red.), Personality psychology in Europe. Proceedings of the Eight European Conference on Personality Psychology (s. 107–127). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
Google Scholar

Mervielde, I., De Fruyt, F. (2000). The Big Five personality factors as a model for the structure of children’s peer nominations. European Journal of Personality, 14, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(200003/04)14:2<91::AID-PER356>3.0.CO;2-Z Muris, P., Meesters, C.,
Google Scholar

Diederen, R. (2005). Psychometric properties of the Big Five Questionnaire for Children (BFQ-C) in a Dutch sample of young adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1757–1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.018
Google Scholar

Muthén, L., Muthén, B. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (Sixth edition). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Google Scholar

Piaget, J. (1960). The psychology of intelligence. Paterson: Littlefield, Adams.
Google Scholar

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Google Scholar

Ruscio, J., Roche, B. (2012). Determining the number of factors to retain in an exploratory factor analysis using comparison data of a known factorial structure. Psychological Assessment, 24, 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025697
Google Scholar

Saris, W. E., Gallhofer, I. N. (2007). Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Hoboken: Willey.
Google Scholar

Shiner, R., Caspi, A. (2003). Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: Measurement, development, and consequences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00101
Google Scholar

Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
Google Scholar

Stefańska-Klar, R. (2005). Późne dzieciństwo. Młodszy wiek szkolny. W: B. Harwas-Napierała, J. Trempała (red.), Psychologia rozwoju człowieka. Charakterystyka okresów życia człowieka (t. 2, s. 130–162). Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J., Szczepaniak, P., Śliwińska, M. (1998). Inwentarz Osobowości NEO-FFI Costy i McCrae: Adaptacja polska. Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych PTP.
Google Scholar