Barkan, S. E. (2014). Gender and abortion attitudes: Religiosity as a suppressor variable. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(4), 940–950. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu047
Google Scholar

Battista, S. D., Pivetti, M., & Berti, C. (2018). Moral Foundations, Political Orientation and Religiosity in Italy. The Open Psychology Journal, 11, 46-58. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101811010046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101811010046
Google Scholar

Biggs, M.A., Gould, H. & Foster, D.G. (2013) Understanding why women seek abortions in the U.S. BMC Women's Health 13, 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-13-29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-13-29
Google Scholar

Brown, M., Chua, K. J., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (2021). Formidability and socioeconomic status uniquely predict militancy and political moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 110284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110284
Google Scholar

Cheng, J., Xu, P. & Thostenson, C. (2024). Psychological traits and public attitudes towards abortion: the role of empathy, locus of control, and need for cognition. Humanities and Social Science Communications, 11, 23. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02487-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02487-z
Google Scholar

Conly, S. (2024). Utilitarisanism and reproductive rights. In Law 2024 (pp. 274-286). Edward Elgar Publising. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901726.00021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789901726.00021
Google Scholar

Crawford, B.L., Jozkowski, K.N., Turner, R.C. et al. (2022). Examining the Relationship Between Roe v. Wade Knowledge and Sentiment Across Political Party and Abortion Identity. Sex Res Soc Policy 19, 837–848. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00597-4
Google Scholar

Douglas, B. D., Ewell, P. J., & Brauer, M. (2023). Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. PloS one, 18(3), e0279720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279720 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279720
Google Scholar

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Google Scholar

Glick, P., Lameiras, M., & Castro, Y. R. (2002). Education and Catholic religiosity as predictors of hostile and benevolent sexism toward women and men. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 47(9-10), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021696209949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021696209949
Google Scholar

Graham, J., Haidt, J., Motyl, M., Meindl, P., Iskiwitch, C., & Mooijman, M. (2018). Moral foundations theory: On the advantages of moral pluralism over moral monism. In K. Gray & J. Graham (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology (pp. 211–222). The Guilford Press
Google Scholar

Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
Google Scholar

Greene, J. D. (2007b). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends Cognitive Science. 11, 322–323. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004
Google Scholar

Guttmacher Institute (2022). State Policy Trends 2022: In a Devastating Year, U.S. Supreme Court's Decision to Overturn Roe Leads to Bans, Confusion and Chaos. (2023, March 9). Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/2022/12/state-policy-trends-2022-devastating-year-us-supreme-courts-decision-overturn-roe-leads
Google Scholar

Guttmacher Institute (2024). Interactive map: US abortion policies and access after Roe. (2024, August 26) Guttmacher Institute. https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/hawaii/abortion-policies
Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to Benevolent Sexism and Complementary Gender Stereotypes: Consequences for Specific and Diffuse Forms of System Justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
Google Scholar

Jost, J. T., Nosek, B. A., & Gosling, S. D. (2008). Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00070.x
Google Scholar

Jozkowski, K.N., Crawford, B.L. & Hunt, M.E. (2018). Complexity in Attitudes Toward Abortion Access: Results from Two Studies. Sex Res Soc Policy 15, 464–482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0322-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-018-0322-4
Google Scholar

Kortsmit, K., Nguyen, A. T., Mandel, M. G., Clark, E., Hollier, L. M., Rodenhizer, J., & Whiteman, M. K. (2022). Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2020. Morbidity And Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries, 71(10), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7110a1
Google Scholar

Loll, D., & Hall, K. S. (2019). Differences in abortion attitudes by policy context and between men and women in the World Values Survey. Women & health, 59(5), 465–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2018.1508539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2018.1508539
Google Scholar

Osborne, D., Huang, Y., Overall, N.C., Sutton, R.M., Petterson, A., Douglas, K.M., Davies, P.G. and Sibley, C.G. (2022), Abortion Attitudes: An Overview of Demographic and Ideological Differences. Political Psychology, 43, 29-76. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12803 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12803
Google Scholar

Osborne, D., & Davies, P. G. (2009). Social dominance orientation, ambivalent sexism, and abortion: Explaining pro-choice and pro-life attitudes. Personality assessment: New research, 309-320.
Google Scholar

Paruzel-Czachura, M., Domurat, A., & Nowak, M. (2023). Moral foundations of pro-choice and pro-life women. Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 1–11. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04800-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/bcm75
Google Scholar

Pew Research Center. (2022). Public opinion on abortion. Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project. Retrieved April 10, 2023, from https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion
Google Scholar

Piazza, J., & Sousa, P. (2014). Religiosity, political orientation, and consequentialist moral thinking. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(3), 334-342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613492826
Google Scholar

Plante, T. G. (2021). The Santa Clara Strength of Religious Faith Questionnaire (SCSRFQ): A brief, nondenominational, and multicultural assessment tool. Assessing spirituality in a diverse world, 445-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52140-0_18
Google Scholar

Prolific. (2024). Researcher help center. What are the advantages and limitations of an online sample? https://researcher-help.prolific.com/en/article/a061d5
Google Scholar

Ruppanner, L., Mikołajczak, G., Kretschmer, K., & Stout, C. T. (2019). Gender linked fate explains lower legal abortion support among white married women. PloS one, 14(10), e0223271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223271 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223271
Google Scholar

Shariff, A. F. (2015). Does religion increase moral behavior? Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.07.009
Google Scholar

Stewart, B. D., & Morris, D. S. M. (2021). Moving morality beyond the in-group: Liberals and conservatives show differences on group-framed moral foundations and these differences mediate the relationships to perceived bias and threat. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 579908. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.579908
Google Scholar

Theofanidis, D., Fountouki, A., & Pediaditaki, O. (2013). To abort or not? A Greek dilemma--case study. Nurse education today, 33(6), 644–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.01.003
Google Scholar

Watts M. G. (2020). Investigating Moral Underpinnings of Attitudes About Abortion [Unpublished bachelor’s thesis]. Appalachian State University.
Google Scholar

Wetstein, M. E., & Albritton, R. B. (1995). Effects of public opinion on abortion policies and use in the American states. Publius, 25(4), 91–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3330814
Google Scholar