Polska adaptacja kwestionariusza CSIE Locke'a do pomiaru poczucia skuteczności interpersonalnej i jego osobowościowe korelaty

Krzysztof Stanisławski; Włodzimierz Strus; Jan Cieciuch

doi:10.21697/sp.2017.17.2.05

Published: 2017-12-21

Vol. 17 No. 2 (2017)

THE POLISH ADAPTATION OF LOCKE’S CSIE QUESTIONNAIRE MEASURING INTER PER SONAL SELF-EFFICACY AND ITS PERSONALITY CORRELATES

Krzysztof Stanisławski , Włodzimierz Strus , Jan Cieciuch

Studia Psychologica: Theoria et praxis

Section: Commentaries

https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2017.17.2.05

Abstract

The aim of the article is to present the Polish version of Locke’s Circumplex Scales for Interpersonal Efficacy (CSIE) as well as to elucidate the personality correlates of interpersonal circumplex constructs and the scope of the repertoire of interpersonal behaviors. The CSIE is based on Wiggins’ interpersonal circumplex model (Wiggins, Trapnell, & Phillips, 1988) and enables the measurement of the eight facets of interpersonal self-efficacy: Dominant, Dominant & Distant, Distant, Yielding & Distant, Yielding, Yielding & Friendly, Friendly, Dominant & Friendly. The study was conducted on a sample of N = 306. The reliability of one scale (FG – Yielding & Distant) was low, and the reliabilities of the remaining scales were acceptable. The internal structure and construct validity of the instrument were satisfactory. Interpersonal self-efficacy was found to be most strongly associated with the Beta / Plasticity metatrait. This fact was discussed in the context of DeYoung’s (2015) Cybernetic Big Five Theory (CB5 . As indicators of the scope of the interpersonal repertoire two measures were used: interpersonal flexibility (profile elevation) and interpersonal rigidity (vector length). The flexibility of interpersonal self-efficacy and interpersonal traits were associated with extraversion, agreeableness, emotional stability, intellect, Alfa / Stability, Beta / Plasticity, and General Factor of Personality. In turn, the rigidity of interpersonal values and interpersonal traits correlated with extraversion, agreeableness, emotional stability, intellect, Alfa / Stability, Beta / Plasticity, and General Factor of Personality.

Keywords:

CSIE questionnaire, interpersonal self-efficacy, circumplex, interpersonal flexibility, interpersonal rigidity

Download files

PDF (Język Polski) PDF

Citation rules

Stanisławski, K., Strus, W., & Cieciuch, J. (2017). THE POLISH ADAPTATION OF LOCKE’S CSIE QUESTIONNAIRE MEASURING INTER PER SONAL SELF-EFFICACY AND ITS PERSONALITY CORRELATES. Studia Psychologica: Theoria Et Praxis, 17(2), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2017.17.2.05

Cited by / Share

References

Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., Pincus, A. L. (1990). Construction of Circumplex Scales for the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521–536. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa5503&4_10
Google Scholar

Ambwani, S., Berenson, K. R., Simms, L., Li, A., Corfield, F., Treasure, J. (2016). Seeing things differently: An experimental investigation of social cognition and interpersonal behavior in anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49, 499–506. DOI:10.1002/eat.22498
Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148. DOI:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. DOI:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. W: T. C. Urdan, F. Pajares (red.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents (s. 307–337). Greenwich: Information Age.
Google Scholar

Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., Vecchione, M. (2007). BFQ-2: manuale. Florencja: Organizzazioni Speciali.
Google Scholar

Carson, R. C. (1969). Interaction concepts of personality. Chicago: Aldine.
Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five Theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33–58. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004
Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 533–552. DOI:10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00171-4
Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G., Weisberg, Y. J., Quilty, L. C., Peterson, J. B. (2013). Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation. Journal of Personality, 81, 465–475. DOI:10.1111/jopy.12020
Google Scholar

Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.73.6.1246
Google Scholar

Erickson, T. M., Newman, M. G., Pincus, A. L. (2009). Predicting unpredictability: Domeasures of interpersonal rigidity/flexibility and distress predict intraindividual variability in social perceptions and behavior? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 893–912. DOI:10.1037/a0016515
Google Scholar

Foa, U. G. (1961). Convergences in the analysis of the structure of interpersonal behavior. Psychological Review, 68, 341–355. DOI:10.1037/h0039638
Google Scholar

Gurtman, M. B. (2011). Circular reasoning about circular assessment. W: L. M. Horowitz, S. Strack (red.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment and therapeutic interventions (s. 299–312). Hoboken: Wiley. DOI:10.1002/9781118001868.ch18
Google Scholar

Gurtman, M. B., Balakrishnan, J. D. (1998). Circular measurement redux: The analysis and interpretation of interpersonal circle profiles. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 344–360. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00154.x
Google Scholar

Gurtman, M. B., Pincus, A. L. (2003). The circumplex model: Methods and research applications. W: J. Shinka, W. F. Velicer (red.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2: Research methods (s. 407–428). Nowy Jork: Wiley. DOI:10.1002/0471264385.wei0216
Google Scholar

Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureno, G., Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems: Psychometric Properties and Clinical Applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885–892. DOI:10.1037//0022-006x.56.6.885
Google Scholar

Kammrath, L. K., McCarthy, M. H., Cortes, K., Friesen, C. (2015). Picking one’s battles: How assertiveness and unassertiveness abilities are associated with extraversion and agreeableness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 622–629. DOI:10.1177/1948550615572635
Google Scholar

Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185–214. DOI:10.1037//0033-295x.90.3.185
Google Scholar

Klinkosz, W. (2004). Interpersonalne Skale Przymiotnikowe (IAS-R). Polskie tłumaczenie kwestionariusza Jerrego S. Wigginsa. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 47, 379–393.
Google Scholar

Kruskal, J. B., Wish, M. (1978). Multidimensional scaling. Newbury Park: Sage. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality; a functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.
Google Scholar

Locke, K. D. (2000). Circumplex Scales of Interpersonal Values: Reliability, validity, and applicability to interpersonal problems and personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 75, 249–267. DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa7502_6
Google Scholar

Locke, K. D., Adamic, E. J. (2012). Interpersonal circumplex vector length and interpersonal decision making. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 764–769. DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.001
Google Scholar

Locke, K. D., Mitchell, G. E. (2016). Self-perceptions, parent-perceptions, and metaperceptions of the interpersonal efficacy of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 31, 19–29. DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2016.07.006
Google Scholar

Locke, K. D., Sadler, P. (2007). Self-efficacy, values, and complementarity in dyadic interactions: Integrating interpersonal and social-cognitive theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 94–109. DOI:10.1177/0146167206293375
Google Scholar

Markey, P. M., Markey, C. N. (2009). A brief assessment of the Interpersonal Circumplex: The IPIP-IPC. Assessment, 16, 352–361. DOI:10.1177/1073191109340382
Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins’s circumplex and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 586–595. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.56.4.586
Google Scholar

Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: Evidence of the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003
Google Scholar

O’Connor, B. P., Dyce, J. A. (2001). Rigid and extreme: A geometric representation of personality disorders in five-factor model space. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1119–1130. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1119
Google Scholar

Ojanen, T., Gronroos, M., Salmivalli, C. (2005). An Interpersonal Circumplex model of children’s social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41, 699–710. DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.699
Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., John, O. P. (1998). Egoistic and moralistic biases in self-perception: The interplay of self-deceptive styles with basic traits and motives. Journal of Personality, 66, 1025–1060. DOI:10.1111/1467-6494.00041
Google Scholar

Paulhus, D. L., Martin, C. L. (1988). Functional flexibility: A new conceptualization of interpersonal flexibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 88–101. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.55.1.88
Google Scholar

De Raad, B. (1995). The psycholexical approach to the structure of interpersonal traits. European Journal of Personality, 9, 89–102. DOI:10.1002/per.2410090203
Google Scholar

Rushton, J. P., Irwing, P. (2011). The General Factor of Personality: Normal and abnormal. W: T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, A. Furnham (red.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (s. 132–163). Londyn: Blackwell. DOI:10.1002/9781444343120.ch5
Google Scholar

Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 304–321. DOI:10.1177/0734282911406653
Google Scholar

Sękowski, A., Klinkosz, W. (2003, lipiec). Analiza psychometryczna polskiej wersji Interpersonalnych Skal Przymiotnikowych J. S. Wigginsa. Plakat prezentowany na 11. Spotkaniu Międzynarodowego Stowarzyszenia Psychologii Różnic indywidualnych. Graz, Austria.
Google Scholar

Sękowski, A., Klinkosz, W. (2016). IAS Interpersonalne Skale Przymiotnikowe Jerry’ego S. Wigginsa. Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
Google Scholar

Sibley, C. G., Duckitt, J. (2008). Personality and prejudice: A meta-analysis and theoretical review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 248–279. DOI:10.1177/1088868308319226
Google Scholar

Stanisławski, K. (2012). Prace nad polską adaptacją kwestionariusza kompetencji interpersonalnych CSIE Locke’a. W: E. Drop, M. Maćkiewicz (red.), Młoda psychologia, t. 1 (s. 133–147). Warszawa: Liberi Libri.
Google Scholar

Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. (2014). Poza Wielką Piątkę – przegląd nowych modeli struktury osobowości. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 19, 17–49. DOI:10.14656/PFP20140102
Google Scholar

Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. (2017). Towards a synthesis of personality, temperament, motivation, emotion and mental health models within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 70–95. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.002
Google Scholar

Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Rowiński, T. (2014). The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: A synthesizing model of personality based on the Big Five. Review of General Psychology, 18, 273–286. DOI:10.1037/gpr0000017
Google Scholar

Topolewska, E., Skimina, E., Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Rowiński, T. (2014). Krótki kwestionariusz do pomiaru Wielkiej Piątki IPIP-BFM-20. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17, 367–384.
Google Scholar

Tracey, T. J. G. (1997). RANDALL: A Microsoft FORTRAN program for a randomization test of hypothesized order relations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 164–168. DOI:10.1177/0013164497057001012
Google Scholar

Tracey, T. J. G. (2005). Interpersonal rigidity and complementarity. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 592–614. DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.12.001
Google Scholar

Tracey, T. J. G., Rohlfing, J. E. (2010). Variations in the understanding of interpersonal behavior: Adherence to the interpersonal circle as a moderator of the rigidity psychological well-being relation. Journal of Personality, 18, 711–746. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00631.x
Google Scholar

Trapnell, P. D., Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781–790. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.59.4.781
Google Scholar

Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A Psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395–412. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.37.3.395
Google Scholar

Wiggins, J. S., Broughton, R. (1991). A geometric taxonomy of personality scales. European Journal of Personality, 5, 343–365. DOI:10.1002/per.2410050503
Google Scholar

Wiggins, J. S., Phillips, N., Trapnell, P. (1989). Circular reasoning about interpersonal behavior: Evidence concerning some untested assumptions underlying diagnostic classification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 296–305. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.56.2.296
Google Scholar

Wiggins, J. S., Trapnell, P., Phillips, N. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517–530. DOI:10.1207/s15327906mbr2304_8
Google Scholar

Krzysztof Stanisławski

stanislawski.kris@gmail.com

Affiliation:

Wydział Filozofii Chrześcijańskiej Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie

Włodzimierz Strus

Affiliation:

Wydział Filozofii Chrześcijańskiej Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie

Jan Cieciuch

Affiliation:

Wydział Filozofii Chrześcijańskiej Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie