Polska adaptacja narzędzia do badania subiektywnej witalności w ujęciu Ryana i Frederick

Karolina Mudło-Głagolska

doi:10.21697/sp.2020.20.1.02

Published: 2020-01-01

Vol. 20 No. 1 (2020)

Polish adaptation of the subjective vitality scale by Ryan and Frederick

Karolina Mudło-Głagolska

Studia Psychologica: Theoria et praxis

Section: Commentaries

https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2020.20.1.02

Abstract

In recent years, attention has been paid to the phenomenological quality of vitality. The construct of subjective vitality as a marker of psychological well-being has the advantage over it that it is more accessible in phenomenological experience, is independent of external well-being criteria, such as objective success, health, support or achievements, and goes beyond the semantically known constructs known in Poland, such as affect positive, commitment to work, flow or life satisfaction. Until now, the possibility of assessing subjective vitality was limited, so to fill this gap, the validity and reliability of the Polish version of the Subjective Vitality Scale was tested, which allows the assessment of subjective vitality at the trait level. In a sample of 709 respondents, the factor accuracy of three versions: 7-, 6- and 5-position in Polish was assessed. The 5-position version had the best fit of the model to the data. Analysis of the value of Cronbach,s α coefficient and the discriminatory power of the position showed that the scale can be considered reliable. The validity in the convergent and divergent aspect was tested on the basis of the relationship between subjective vitality and the dimensions of chronic fatigue, negative and positive affect, somatic symptoms, anxiety, functional disorders, symptoms of depression, life satisfaction and vitality in a different conceptualization and the number of hours devoted to recreational activities. The predictive value of satisfaction with meeting psychological needs in general and with regard to work was partially confirmed. The analysis of intergroup differences carried out in a sample of 40 people suffering from discopathy and a selected control group showed that the sick and somatically healthy people differed significantly in the result of subjective vitality. The Subjective Vitality Scale can be regarded as an accurate and reliable tool. The 5-item version of the Subjective Vitality Scale is recommended.

Keywords:

energy, subjective vitality, scale adaptation, vitality, well-being

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Mudło-Głagolska, K. (2020). Polish adaptation of the subjective vitality scale by Ryan and Frederick. Studia Psychologica: Theoria Et Praxis, 20(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.21697/sp.2020.20.1.02

Cited by / Share

References

Adie, J. W., Duda, J. L., Ntoumanis, N. (2012). Perceived coach-autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well-and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: A longitudinal investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(1), 51–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.07.008
Google Scholar

Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52, 317–332. DOI: 10.1007/BF02294359
Google Scholar

Arkes, H. R., Herren, L. T., Isen, A. M. (1988). The role of potential loss in the influence of affect on risk-taking behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42(2), 181–193. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(88)90011-8
Google Scholar

Benyamini, Y., Idler, E. L., Leventhal, H., Leventhal, E. A. (2000). Positive affect and function as influences on self-assessments of health: expanding our view beyond illness and disability. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55, 107–116. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/55.2.P107
Google Scholar

Bertrams, A., Dyllick, T. H., Englert, C., Krispenz, A. (2020). German adaptation of the Subjective Vitality Scales (SVS-G). Open Psychology, 2, 57–75. DOI: 10.1515/psych-2020-0005
Google Scholar

Bostic, T. J., Rubio, D. M., Hood, M. (2000). A validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling. Social Indicators Research, 52, 313–324. DOI: 10.1023/A:1007136110218
Google Scholar

Brzozowski, P., Watson, D. B., Clark, L. A. (2010). Skala uczuć pozytywnych i negatywnych SUPIN. Polska adaptacja skali PANAS Davida Watsona i Lee Ann Clark. Podręcznik. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
Google Scholar

Cohen, S., Alper, C. M., Doyle, W. J., Treanor, J. J., Turner, R. B. (2006). Positive emotional style predicts resistance to illness after experimental exposure to rhinovirus or influenza a virus. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68, 809–815. DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000245867.92364.3c
Google Scholar

Chen, F., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., Paxton, P. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the use of fixed cutoff points in RMSEA test statistic in structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 36, 462–494. DOI: 10.1177/0049124108314720
Google Scholar

Dawes, H., Collett, J., Meaney, A., Duda, J., Sackley, C., Wade, D., … Izadi, H. (2014). Delayed recovery of leg fatigue symptoms following a maximal exercise session in people with multiple sclerosis. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28, 139–148. DOI: 10.1177/1545968313503218
Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134. DOI:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2000). The „What” and „Why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. DOI:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Google Scholar

Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185. DOI:10.1037/a0012801
Google Scholar

Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223. DOI:10.1023/A:1025007614869
Google Scholar

Goldbeck, F., Hautzinger, M., Wolkenstein, L. (2019). Validation of the german version of the Subjective Vitality Scale – a cross-sectional study and a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Well-Being Assessment, 3, 17–37. DOI: 10.1007/s41543-019-00019-8
Google Scholar

Gumz, A., Kästner, D., Raczka, K. A., Weigel, A., Osen, B., Rose, M., … Karacic, M. (2015). Aggregating factors of the change process in the treatment of anorexia nervosa. Eating Behaviors, 19, 81–85. DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.06.002
Google Scholar

Gunnell, K. E., Crocker, P. R., Mack, D. E., Wilson, P. M., Zumbo, B. D. (2014). Goal contents, motivation, psychological need satisfaction, well-being and physical activity: A test of self-determination theory over 6 months. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 15, 19–29. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.08.005
Google Scholar

Huta, V. (2015). The complementary roles of eudaimonia and hedonia and how they can be pursued in practice. W: S. Joseph (red.), Positive psychology in practice: Promoting human flourishing in work, health, education, and everyday life (s. 159–182). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons. DOI: 10.1002/9781118996874.ch10
Google Scholar

Huta, V., Waterman, A. S. (2014). Eudaimonia and its distinction from hedonia: developing a classification and terminology for understanding conceptual and operational definitions. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1425–1456. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-013-9485-0
Google Scholar

Iso-Ahola, S. E. (1980). The social psychology of leisure and recreation. Dubuque, Iowa: William C Brown.
Google Scholar

Juczyński, Z. (2001). Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia. Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.
Google Scholar

Kasser, T., Cohn, S., Kanner, A. D., Ryan, R. M. (2007). Some costs of American corporate capitalism: a psychological exploration of value and goal conflicts. Psychological Inquiry, 18, 1–22. DOI: 10.1080/10478400701386579
Google Scholar

Kawabata, M., Yamazaki, F., Guo, D. W., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2017). Advancement of the Subjective Vitality Scale: examination of alternative measurement models for Japanese and Singaporeans. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 27, 1793–1800. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12760
Google Scholar

Kenyon, M., Young, F., Mufti, G. J., Pagliuca, A., Lim, Z., Ream, E. (2015). Life coaching following haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a mixed‐method investigation of feasibility and acceptability. European Journal of Cancer Care, 24, 531–541. DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12297
Google Scholar

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (Methodology in the social sciences, wyd. 2). NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

Makowiec-Dąbrowska, T., Koszada-Włodarczyk, W. (2006). Przydatność kwestionariusza CIS20R do badania zmęczenia przewlekłego. Medycyna Pracy, 57, 335–345.
Google Scholar

Makowska, Z., Merecz, D. (2001). Polska adaptacja kwestionariuszy ogólnego stanu zdrowia Davida Goldberga: GHQ-12 i GHQ-28. W: B. Dudek (red.), Ocena zdrowia psychicznego na podstawie badań kwestionariuszami Davida Goldberga. Podręcznik dla użytkowników kwestionariuszy GHQ-12 i GHQ-28 (s. 191–264). Łódź: IMP.
Google Scholar

Martela, F., DeHaan, C. R., Ryan, R. M. (2016). On enhancing and diminishing energy through psychological means: Research on vitality and depletion from self-determination theory. W: E. R. Hirt, J. Clarkson, L. Jia (red.), Self-regulation and ego control (s. 67–85). Saint Louis: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Martela, F., Ryan, R. M. (2016). Prosocial behavior increases well-being and vitality even without contact with the beneficiary: Causal and behavioral evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 351–357. DOI: 10.1007/s11031-016-9552-z
Google Scholar

Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2017). Assessing the size of model misfit in structural equation models. Psychometrika, 82, 533–558. DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9552-7
Google Scholar

Nix, G. A., Ryan, R. M., Manly, J. B., Deci, E. L. (1999). Revitalization through self-regulation: the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on happiness and vitality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(3), 266–284. DOI: 10.1006/jesp.1999.1382
Google Scholar

Polk, D. E., Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Kirschbaum, C. (2005). State and trait affect as predictors of salivary cortisol in healthy adults. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(3), 261–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2004.08.004
Google Scholar

Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: the role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419–435. DOI: 10.1177/0146167200266002
Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., Sinigaglia, C. (2016). The mirror mechanism: a basic principle of brain function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 757–765. DOI: 10.1038/nrn.2016.135
Google Scholar

Rouse, P. C., Veldhuijzen van Zanten, J. J. C. S., Ntoumanis, N., Metsios, G. S., Yu, C., Kitas, G. D., Duda, J. L. (2015). Measuring the positive psychological well-being of people with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional validation of the subjective vitality scale. Arthritis Research & Therapy, 17(312), 1–7. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-015-0827-7
Google Scholar

Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., Davidson, K. W., Saab, P. G., Kubzansky, L. (2005). The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice: the emerging field of behavioral cardiology. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45, 637–651. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.005
Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00501.x
Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., Bernstein, J. H., Brown, K. W. (2010). Weekends, work, and well-being: psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 29, 95–122. DOI: 10.1521/jscp.2010.29.1.95
Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2006). Self‐regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self‐determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2008). From ego depletion to vitality: theory and findings concerning the facilitation of energy available to the self. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 702–717. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00098.x
Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, NY: Guilford Press. DOI:10.7202/1041847ar
Google Scholar

Ryan, R. M., Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x
Google Scholar

Salama-Younes, M. (2011). Positive mental health, subjective vitality and satisfaction with life for French physical education students. World Journal of Sport Sciences, 4, 90–97.
Google Scholar

Savalei, V. (2012). The relationship between root mean square error of approximation and model misspecification in confirmatory factor analysis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72, 910–932. DOI: 10.1177/0013164412452564
Google Scholar

Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar

Sheldon, K. M., Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 531–543. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.3.531
Google Scholar

Sheldon, K. M., Ryan, R., Reis, H. T. (1996). What makes for a good day? Competence and autonomy in the day and in the person. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1270–1279. DOI: 10.1177/01461672962212007
Google Scholar

Shi, D., Lee, T., Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2019). Understanding the model size effect on SEM fit indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 310–334. DOI: 10.1177/0013164418783530
Google Scholar

Souza, L. A. S. de, Torres, A. R. R., Barbosa,G. A., Lima, T. J. S. de, Souza, L. E. C. de. (2015). Bem-estar subjetivo e burnout em cadetes militares: o papel mediador da autoeficácia. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28, 744–752. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7153.201528412
Google Scholar

Tylka, J., Piotrowicz, R. (2009). Kwestionariusz oceny jakości życia SF-36 – wersja polska (Quality of life SF-36 questionnaire – the Polish version). Kardiologia Polska (Polish Heart Journal), 67, 1166–1169.
Google Scholar

Uchnast, Z. (2007). Skala Podstawowych Potrzeb Psychologicznych, E. L. Deci, R. M. Ryan. Tekst niepublikowany. Lublin: KUL.
Google Scholar

Uysal, R., Satici, S. A., Satici, B., Akin, A. (2014). Subjective vitality as mediator and moderator of the relationship between life satisfaction and subjective happiness. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(2), 489–497. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2014.2.1828
Google Scholar

Wang, W. C., Chen, H. F., Jin, K. Y. (2015). Item response theory models for wording effects in mixed-format scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 75,157–178. DOI: 10.1177/0013164414528209
Google Scholar