Abstrakt

"e anthropological upheaval in theology is connected with certain changes in the
way of practising philosophy in the (/ and ) centuries. Of course, Kant’s revolution
was of fundamental importance. With regard to the theological anthropology
of K. Rahner’s situation, it can be described as follows: “…this is a critical
reflection, which does not pass to the agenda over Kant’s ‘Copernican revolution,’
but draws attention to the creative role of the subject in the process of cognition.
A phenomenological reflection leN its mark on Rahner, from which he took over
the conviction that we perceive existence only through consciousness, more precisely:
we learn about the structures of existence through the analysis of the given
consciousness. So here is the source of the transcendental character of Rahnerian
anthropology. It is simply a reflection on man at the level of a priori conditions,
anticipating external experience. "is is not necessarily a chronological order,
but certainly a logical one, since every philosophical question about the external
existence contains a hidden question about the sense of human existence.”