John D. Caputo’s Concept of Divinity

Karol Jasiński

doi:10.21697/ct.96.1.07

Published: 2026-02-17

Vol. 96 No. 1 (2026)

John D. Caputo’s Concept of Divinity

Karol Jasiński

Collectanea Theologica

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.96.1.07

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the concept of Divinity developed by American philosopher and theologian John D. Caputo. It is worth noting that, for Caputo, Divinity is not so much a personal God as a Mystery that appears as a spectre. Caputo emphasises the pluralism of approaches to the divine Mystery and encourages openness to its various manifestations. The path to understanding it is not through metaphysics, but through phenomenology and hermeneutics. In each case, it is narrowed down to the intra-world dimension. Divinity is thus considered in terms of event, the depth of being, call and promise. These four fundamental aspects are the subject of the analyses, determining also their structure. The specific object of the promise is a new moral order of the world. Its expression is an ideal social order, identified with perfect democracy. Divinity would be its symbol.

Keywords:

Divinity, event, depth of being, call, promise

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Karol Jasiński, The Internal Secularisation of Religion , Collectanea Theologica: Vol. 91 No. 4 (2021)
Karol Jasiński, The Salvific Function of Religion , Collectanea Theologica: Vol. 95 No. 1 (2025)
Karol Jasiński, Tomáš Halík’s Concept of God as the Depth of Reality , Collectanea Theologica: Vol. 93 No. 3 (2023)

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Jasiński, K. (2026). John D. Caputo’s Concept of Divinity. Collectanea Theologica, 96(1), 163–186. https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.96.1.07

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Arendt, Hannah. 2016. Życie umysłu. Translated by Hanna Buczyńska-Garewicz, Robert Piłat, and Bogdan Baran. Warszawa: Aletheia.
Google Scholar

Bocheński, Józef M. 1993. Logika i filozofia. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 1982, Heidegger and Aquinas: And Essay on Overcoming Metaphysics. New York: Fordham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday19822639
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 1986. The Mystical Element in Heidegger’s Thought. New York: Fordham University Press.
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 1987. Radical Hermeneutics: Repetition, Deconstruction and the Hermeneutic Project. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/2735.0
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 1993. Against Ethics: Contributions to a Poetics of Obligation with Constant Reference to Deconstruction. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv15d7z9r
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 1997a. Deconstruction in a Nutshell: A Conversation with Jacques Derrida. New York: Fordham University Press.
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 1997b. The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida. Religion without Religion. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2005rjr
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2001. On Religion. London: Routledge Press.
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2003. “Without Sovereignty, Without Being: Unconditionality, the Coming God and Derrida’s Democracy to Come.” Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 3:9–26.
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2005. “The Experience of God and the Axiology of the Impossible.” In The Experience of God. A Postmodern Response, edited by Kevin Hart and Barbara E. Wall, 20–41. New York: Fordham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fso/9780823225187.003.0002
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2006a. Philosophy and Theology. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2006b. The Weakness of God. A Theology of the Event. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/4159.0
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2007. “Spectral Hermeneutics. On the Weakness of God and the Theology of the Event.” In After the Death of God, edited by John D. Caputo and Gianni Vattimo, 47–85. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2011a. “Hospitality and the Trouble with God.” In Phenomenologies of the Stranger. Between Hostility and Hospitality, edited by Richard Kearney and Kascha Semonovitch, 83–97. New York: Fordham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823234615.003.0006
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2011b. “The Return of Anti-Religion: From Radical Atheism to Radical Theology.” Journal for Cultural and Religious Theory 2:32–125.
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2013. “Theopoetics as Radical Theology.” In Theopoetic Folds. Philosophizing Multifariousness, edited by Roland Faber and Jeremy Fackenthal, 125–41. New York: Fordham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823251551.003.0009
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2016. The Folly of God. A Theology of the Unconditional. Salem, OR: Polebridge Press.
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2019. Cross and Cosmos. A Theology of Difficult Glory. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvm20330
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2020. In Search of Radical Theology: Expositions, Explorations, Exhortations. New York: Fordham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823289219
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2021a. “Do Radical Theologians Pray? A Spirituality of the Event.” Religions 12 (9): 679. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12090679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12090679
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2021b. “Where Is Richard Kearney Coming From? Hospitality, Anatheism, and Ana-deconstruction.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 5:551–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211021929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01914537211021929
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2022a. Specters of God. An Anatomy of the Apophatic Imagination. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2ngx61f
Google Scholar

Caputo, John D. 2022b. “Thinking with Faith, Thinking as Faith: What Comes After Onto-theo-logy?” Open Theology 8:237–47. https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2022-0204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2022-0204
Google Scholar

Caruana, John, and Mark Cauchi. 2016. “The Insistence of Religion in Philosophy: An Interview with John D. Caputo.” Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 1:11–32. https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium20162012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium20162012
Google Scholar

Deleuze, Gilles. 1969. The Logic of Sense. Translated by Mark Lester and Charles Stivale. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 1999. “Wiara i wiedza.” Translated by Piotr Mrówczyński. In Religia: seminarium na Capri prowadzone przez Jacquesa Derridę i Gianniego Vattimo, edited by Jacques Derrida, Gianni Vattimo et al., 7–97. Warszawa: KR.
Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 2005. Rogues: Two Essays on Reason. Translated by Pascale-Anne Brault and Michael Naas. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Derrida, Jacques. 2006. Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning and the New International. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Halík, Tomáš. 2004. Co nie jest chwiejne, jest nietrwałe. Labiryntem świata z wiarą i wątpliwościami. Translated by Juliusz Zychowicz. Kraków: WAM.
Google Scholar

Halík, Tomáš. 2006. Wzywany czy niewzywany, Bóg się tutaj zjawi. Europejskie wykłady z filozofii i socjologii dziejów chrześcijaństwa. Translated by Andrzej Babuchowski. Kraków: WAM.
Google Scholar

Halík, Tomáš. 2007. Noc spowiednika. Paradoksy małej wiary w epoce postoptymistycznej. Translated by Andrzej Babuchowski. Katowice: Księgarnia św. Jacka.
Google Scholar

Halík, Tomáš. 2010. Dotknij ran. Duchowość nieobojętności. Translated by Andrzej Babuchowski. Kraków: Znak.
Google Scholar

Halík, Tomáš. 2017. I Want You to Be: On the God of Love. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Google Scholar

Halík, Tomáš. 2022. Popołudnie chrześcijaństwa. Odwaga do zmiany. Translated by Tomasz Maćkowiak. Kraków: Znak.
Google Scholar

Hanson, Jim. 2015. “Surviving Postmodernism: A New Ontotheology.” American Journal of Sociological Research 5 (A): 13–21. http://article.sapub.org/10.5923.s.sociology.201501.02.html.
Google Scholar

Hart, Kevin. 1989. The Trespass of the Sign. Deconstruction, Theology, Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Jasiński, Karol. 2023. “Tomáš Halík’s Concept of God as the Depth of Reality.” Collectanea Theologica 93 (3): 89–118. https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.2023.93.3.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.2023.93.3.04
Google Scholar

Kearney, Richard. 2001. The God Who May Be: The Hermeneutics of Religion. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2979/1826.0
Google Scholar

Kearney, Richard. 2012. “Ana-theism: God after God.” In Phenomenology and the Theological Turn, edited by Jeffrey McCurry and Angelle Pryor, 8–23. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.
Google Scholar

Kearney, Richard. 2024. Anateizm. Powrót do Boga po Bogu. Translated by Tomasz Sieczkowski. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8331-436-5
Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc. 2002. Being given. Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc. 2016. Givenness and Revelation. Translated by Stephen E. Lewis. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757733.001.0001
Google Scholar

Marion, Jean-Luc. 2017. Believing in Order to See. On the Rationality of Revelation and the Irrationality of Some Believers. Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner. New York: Fordham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823275847.001.0001
Google Scholar

Tarnowski, Karol. 2017. Pragnienie metafizyczne. Kraków: Znak.
Google Scholar

Ullrich, Calvin D. 2020. “Theopoetics to Theopraxis Toward a Critchlean Supplement to Caputo’s Radical Political Theology.” Forum Philosophicum 1:163–82. https://doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2020.2501.10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/forphil.2020.2501.10
Google Scholar