Resolving the Ambiguity in Nahum 1:12: אם שׁלמים [ʾm šlmm] or משׁל מים‎ [mšl mym]

Philip Chia

doi:10.21697/ct.96.1.01

Opublikowane: 2026-02-17

Tom 96 Nr 1 (2026)

Resolving the Ambiguity in Nahum 1:12

אם שׁלמים [ʾm šlmm] or משׁל מים‎ [mšl mym]

Philip Chia

Collectanea Theologica

Dział: Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.96.1.01

Abstrakt

Która fraza: אם שׁלמים czy też משׁל מים‎ znajduje się w Księdze Nahuma 1,12? Tradycja tekstowa jest w tym względzie podzielona. Septuaginta (LXX) i Peszitta popierają lekcję משׁל מים‎ w Na 1,12, podczas gdy Tekst Masorecki, Targum i Wulgata zachowują אם שׁלמים („chociaż są w pełni sił” lub „chociaż są kompletne”). Ta rozbieżność wywołuje istotne pytania dotyczące początkowego sformułowania wersetu, jego interpretacji i pochodzenia różnych lekcji, które pojawiły się w procesie transmisji. Aby zidentyfikować najbardziej prawdopodobny tekst oryginalny i zbadać potencjalne wyjaśnienia rozbieżności między tymi starożytnymi źródłami, w artykule wykorzystano krytykę tekstu jako główne podejście – przeanalizowano dowody rękopisowe, oceniono prawdopodobieństwo zmian transkrypcji i tłumaczenia oraz wzięto pod uwagę elementy kontekstowe i językowe.

Słowa kluczowe:

starożytne teksty, Stary Testament, krytyka tekstu, Księga Nahuma, ʾm šlmm, mšl mym

Inne teksty tego samego autora

Philip Chia, Analysis of אמצים [’mṣîm] in the Hexapla , Collectanea Theologica: Tom 95 Nr 1 (2025)
Philip Chia, Temperature or Nature? , Collectanea Theologica: Tom 95 Nr 3 (2025)

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Chia, P. (2026). Resolving the Ambiguity in Nahum 1:12: אם שׁלמים [ʾm šlmm] or משׁל מים‎ [mšl mym]. Collectanea Theologica, 96(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.96.1.01

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Benoit, Pierre, Józef Tadeusz Milik, and Roland de Vaux. 1961. Les grottes de Murabbaʿât. Discoveries in the Judaean Desert 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Boltzman, Ellis R., and Eric J. Tully. 2016. Old Testament Textual Criticism: A Practical Introduction. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
Google Scholar

Brown, Francis, Samuel R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs. 1996. The Brown–Driver–Briggs Hebrew and English Lexicon: With an Appendix on Biblical Aramaic, Coded with the Numbering System from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers.
Google Scholar

Chia, Philip. 2025. “Analysis of אמצים [’mṣîm] in the Hexapla.” Collectanea Theologica 95 (1): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.2025.95.1.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.2025.95.1.01
Google Scholar

Cross, Frank Moore. 1995. The Ancient Library of Qumran and Modern Biblical Studies. Revised ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Google Scholar

Ehrman, Bart D. 1993. The Orthodox Corruption of Scripture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Elliger, Karl, Wilhelm Rudolph, Hans Peter Rüger, and Adrian Schenker. 1997. Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia Quae Antea Cooperantibus A. Alt, O. Eissfeldt, P. Kahle Ediderat R. Kittel. Editio funditus renovata adjuvantibus H. Bardtke [und weitere], cooperantibus H. P. Rüger et J. Ziegler, ediderunt K. Elliger et W. Rudolph; Textum Masoreticum curavit H. P. Rüger; Masoram elaboravit G. E. Weil; ed. quinta emendata opera. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.
Google Scholar

Epp, Eldon Jay, and Gordon D. Fee. 1993. Studies in the Theory and Method of New Testament Textual Criticism. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Google Scholar

Field, F. 1875. Origenis Hexaplorum quae supersunt, sive veterum interpretum Graecorum in totum Vetus Testamentum fragmenta; post Flaminium Nobilium, Drusium et Montefalconium, adhibita etiam versione syro–hemplari, concinnavit, emendavit, et multis partibus auxit Fridericus Field. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

Fischer, Bonifatius, and Robert Weber. 1994. Biblia Sacra: iuxta vulgatam versionem. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.
Google Scholar

Gelston, Anthony. 2010. Biblia Hebraica Quinta: Twelve Prophets. Durham: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft. (= BHQ).
Google Scholar

Grütter, N. 2016. Das Buch Nahum: eine vergleichende Untersuchung des masoretischen Texts und der Septuagintaübersetzung. Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlagsgesellschaft.
Google Scholar

Haar Romeny, Robert B. ter, W. Th. van Peursen, Rijksuniversiteit te Leiden. Peshitta–Instituut, and International Organization for the Study of the Old Testament, eds. 1972. The Old Testament in Syriac: according to the Peshiṭta Version. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Haupt, Paul. 1907. “Xenophon’s Account of the Fall of Nineveh.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 28:99–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/592761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/592761
Google Scholar

Koehler, Ludwig, and Walter Baumgartner, eds. 2000. The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament. Translated by Mervyn Edwin J. Richardson. Accordance electronic ed., v. 3.0. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Luckenbill, Daniel David. 1927. Ancient Records of Assyria and Babylonia. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar

Metzger, Bruce M. 2005. The Text of the New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Moshe ben Asher, and David Samuel Löwinger. 1971. Codex Cairo of the Bible: From the Karaite Synagogue at Abbasiya – The earliest extant Hebrew manuscript written in 895 by Moshe Ben Asher [Limited facsimile edition of 160 copies]. Jerusalem: Makor Publishing Ltd.
Google Scholar

NET Bible (New English Translation). 2005. Spokane, WA: Biblical Studies Press.
Google Scholar

Olmstead, A. T. 1923. History of Assyria. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Google Scholar

Parker, David C. 2008. An Introduction to the New Testament Manuscripts and Their Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619922
Google Scholar

Rahlfs, Alfred, and Robert Hanhart. 2006. Septuaginta: Id Est Vetus Testamentum Graece Iuxta LXX Interpretes. 2nd ed. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.
Google Scholar

Reade, Julian. 1978a. “Studies in Assyrian Geography: Part I: Sennacherib and the Waters of Nineveh.” Revue d’Assyriologie et d’Archéologie Orientale 72 (1): 47–72.
Google Scholar

Reade, Julian. 1978b. “Studies in Assyrian Geography, Part II: The Northern Canal System.” Revue d’Assyriologie et d’Archéologie Orientale 72 (1): 157–180.
Google Scholar

Thompson, R. Campbell, and R. W. Hutchinson. 1982. A Century of Exploration at Nineveh. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms International.
Google Scholar

Tov, Emanuel. 2012. Textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible. 3rd revised and expanded ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Google Scholar

Tov, Emanuel. 2015. Textual criticism of the Hebrew Bible, Qumran, Septuagint. Leiden: Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004285569
Google Scholar

Tov, Emanuel, Robert A. Kraft, and P. J. Parsons, eds. 1990. The Greek Minor Prophets Scroll from Naḥal Ḥever: 8 ḤEv XII Gr. Discoveries in the Judaean Desert. Oxford – New York: Clarendon Press – Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Ulrich, Eugene. 1997. Qumran Cave 4. X: The Prophets. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Google Scholar

VanderKam, James C., and Peter Flint. 2002. The Meaning of the Dead Sea Scrolls: Their Significance for Understanding the Bible, Judaism, Jesus, and Christianity. San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco.
Google Scholar

Philip Chia

pchia275@students.sbts.edu
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2453-7497

Afiliacja:

University of Pretoria Indonezja

Biogram

Affiliation: Evangelical Theological Seminary of Indonesia, Reformed Theological Seminary of Indonesia, and the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, Bethel Theological Seminary of Indonesia – The Way.

Position: Director of Doctoral Studies at Evangelical Theological Seminary of Indonesia, an adjunct professor of Reformed Theological Seminary of Indonesia and Bethel Theological Seminary of Indonesia – The Way.