Charmtech Labs. (2020). Capti Assess with ETS ReadBasix. https://www.captivoice.com
Google Scholar
Christ, T. J., Monaghen, B. D., Zopluoglu, C., & Van Norman, E. R. (2013). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading: Evaluation of growth estimates derived with pre–post assessment methods. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38(3), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508412456417
Google Scholar
Colón, E. P., & Kranzler, J. H. (2006). Effect of instructions on curriculum-based measurement of reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 24(4), 318–328. http://doi.org/10.1177/0734282906287830
Google Scholar
Cummings, K. D., Biancarosa, G., Schaper, A., & Reed, D. K. (2014). Examiner error in curriculum-based measurement of oral reading. Journal of School Psychology, 52(4), 361-375. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.05.007
Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., Lynam, D. R., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2011). Role of test motivation in intelligence testing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(19), 7716–7720. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018601108
Google Scholar
Erdodi, L. A., Abeare, C. A., Lichtenstein, J. D., Tyson, B. T., Kucharski, B., Zuccato, B. G., & Roth, R. M. (2017). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) processing speed scores as measures of noncredible responding: The third generation of embedded performance validity indicators. Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 148–157. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pas0000319
Google Scholar
Finney, S. J., Sundre, D. L., Swain, M. S., & Williams, L. M. (2016). The validity of value-added estimates from low-stakes testing contexts: The impact of change in test-taking motivation and test consequences. Educational Assessment, 21(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2015.1127753
Google Scholar
Gagnon, J. C., Barber, B. R., VanLoan, C., & Leone, P. E. (2009). Juvenile correctional schools: Characteristics and approaches to curriculum. Education & Treatment of Children, 32(4), 673– 696. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1353/etc.0.0068
Google Scholar
Kilgus, S. P., Methe, S. A., Maggin, D. M., & Tomasula, J. L. (2014). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (R-CBM): A diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis of evidence supporting use in universal screening. Journal of School Psychology, 52(4), 377-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2014.06.002
Google Scholar
Penk, C., & Schipolowski, S. (2015). Is it all about value? Bringing back the expectancy component to the assessment of test-taking motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.002
Google Scholar
Puzzanchera, C., Hockenberry, S., & Sickmund. (2022). Youth and the juvenile justice system: 2022 national report. National Center for Juvenile Justice.
Google Scholar
Reed, D. K. (2018). Education for U.S. youth in secure care: The sum of the parts is not whole. In D. Gallard, K. Evans, & J. Millington (Eds.), Children and their education in secure accommodation: Interdisciplinary perspectives of education, health, and youth justice (pp. 117-127). Routledge Books.
Google Scholar
Reed, D. K., & Petscher, Y. (2012). The influence of testing prompt and condition on middle school students’ retell performance. Reading Psychology, 33(6), 562-585. http://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2011.557333
Google Scholar
Reed, D. K., Cummings, K. D., Schaper, A., *Lynn, D., & Biancarosa, G. (2019). Accuracy and reliability in identifying miscues during oral reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 32, 1009-1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9899-5
Google Scholar
Reed, D. K., & Wexler, J. (2014). “Our teachers…don’t give us no help, no nothin’”: Juvenile offenders’ perceptions of academic support. Residential Treatment for Children and Youth, 31(3), 188-218. http://doi.org/10.1080/0886571X.2014.943568
Google Scholar
Reed, D. K., Wexler, J., & Vaughn, S. (2012). RTI for reading at the secondary level: Recommended literacy practices and remaining questions. Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Rios, J. (2021). Improving test-taking effort in low-stakes group-based educational testing: A meta-analysis of interventions. Applied Measurement in Education, 34(2), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2021.1890741
Google Scholar
Ritchey, K. D., Silverman, R. D., Schatschneider, C., & Speece, D. L. (2015). Prediction and stability of reading problems in middle childhood. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(3), 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219413498116
Google Scholar
Sabatini, J., Weeks, J., O’Reilly, T., Bruce, K., Steinburg, J., & Chao, S-F. (2019). SARA reading components tests, RISE forms: Technical adequacy and test design (3rd ed.). ETS Research Report 19-36. ETS.
Google Scholar
Sanders, S., Jolivette, K., & Harris, C. (2021). Improving the reading comprehension skills of systems-involved youth: A preliminary investigation of an underserved population. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(3), 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12254
Google Scholar
Silm, G., Pedaste, M., & Täht, K. (2020). The relationship between performance and test-taking effort when measured with self-report or time-based instruments: A meta-analytic review. Educational Research Review, 31(100335), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100335
Google Scholar
Soland, J. (2018). The achievement gap or the engagement gap? Investigating the sensitivity of gaps estimates to test motivation. Applied Measurement in Education, 31(4), 312–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2018.1495213
Google Scholar
Van Norman, E. R., & Parker, D. C. (2016). An evaluation of the linearity of curriculum-based measurement of oral reading (CBM-R) progress monitoring data: Idiographic considerations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31(4), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12108
Google Scholar
Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2005). Examinee motivation in low-stakes assessment: Problems and potential solutions. Educational Assessment, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1001_1
Google Scholar
Wise, S. L., & DeMars, C. E. (2010). Examinee non-effort and the validity of program assessment results. Educational Assessment, 15(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627191003673216
Google Scholar