The ability of children aged 6 and 9 years, respectively, to detect errors in a narrative based on incorrect information about evaporation in the water cycle

Jan Jelinek

doi:10.21697/fp.2022.2.26

Published: 2022-12-31

Vol. 12 No. 2 (2022)

The ability of children aged 6 and 9 years, respectively, to detect errors in a narrative based on incorrect information about evaporation in the water cycle

Jan Jelinek

Pedagogical Forum

Section: Colloquia

https://doi.org/10.21697/fp.2022.2.26

Abstract

Children begin to fully understand evaporation at the age of 11 years, but they already have some idea of this phenomenon in preschool age. The paper presents the results of a research exploring the understanding of evaporation by 6- and 9-year-old children. The research used the method of a narrative based on incorrect information in order to verify whether and how well children would discover the errors in that narrative and how they could explain the process of evaporation. The incorrect narrative method is inspired by the science fiction film genre, which uses false assumptions to prove something that is not true. According to the research, half of the children knew that evaporation accompanies the process of cloud formation, but only half of the children who knew that (one-fourth of the respondents) could detect an error in the narrative. The reason for that is believed to be children’s lack of critical thinking and limited structured knowledge of evaporation in the water cycle in nature.

Keywords:

evaporation, cloud formation, pre-school students, primary school students, incorrect narrative

Download files

pdf

Citation rules

Jelinek, J. (2022). The ability of children aged 6 and 9 years, respectively, to detect errors in a narrative based on incorrect information about evaporation in the water cycle. Pedagogical Forum, 12(2), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.21697/fp.2022.2.26

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

Adbo K., Taber K.S. (2009). Learners’ mental models of the particle nature of matter: A study of 16-year-old Swedish science students. International. “Journal of Science Education”, no 6, p. 757–786.
Google Scholar

Ahi B. (2017). The world of plants in children’s drawings: color preferences and the effect of age and gender on these preferences. “Journal of Baltic Science Education”, no 1, p. 32–42.
Google Scholar

Åkerblom A., Součková D., Pramling N. (2019). Preschool children’s conceptions of water, molecule, and chemistry before and after participating in a playfully dramatized early childhood education activity. „Cultural Studies of Science Education”, no 4.
Google Scholar

Arthurs L.A. (2019). Using student conceptions about groundwater as resources for teaching about aquifers. “Journal of Geoscience Education”, no 2, p. 161–173.
Google Scholar

Bar V. (1989). Children’s views about the water cycle. “Science Education”, no 4, p. 149–169.
Google Scholar

Bar V., Galili I. (1994). Stages of children’s views about evaporation. “International Journal of Science Education”, no 2, s. 149–169.
Google Scholar

Barnett M., Wagner H., Gatling A. et al. (2006). The Impact of Science Fiction Film on Student Understanding of Science. “Journal of Science Education and Technology”, no 15, p. 179–191.
Google Scholar

Bryce T., Blown E. (2021). Imagery and Explanation in the Dynamics of Recall of Intuitive and Scientific Knowledge: Insights from Research on Children’s Cosmologies. “Research in Science Education”, no 51.
Google Scholar

Cardak O. (2009). Science student’s misconception of the water cycle according to their drawings. “Journal of Applied Sciences”, no 5, p. 865–873.
Google Scholar

diSessa A.A. (2017). Knowledge in pieces. An Evolving Framework for Understanding Knowing and Learning. In: Converging Perspectives on Conceptual Change: Mapping an Emerging Paradigm in the Learning Sciences. Amin T.G., Levini O. (eds.). Londyn: Routledge, p. 9–16.
Google Scholar

Ellis B.J., Bjorklund D.F. (2005). Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development. New York: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar

Filipiak E. (2008). Uczenie się w klasie szkolnej w perspektywie socjokulturowej. In: Rozwijanie zdolności uczenia się. Wybrane konteksty i problemy. Filipiak E. (eds.). Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
Google Scholar

Fragkiadaki G., Ravanis K. (2015). Preschool children’s mental representations of clouds. “Journal of Baltic Science Education”, no 2, p. 267–274.
Google Scholar

Gelman R. (1980). What young children know about numbers. „Educational Psychologist”, no 1, p. 54–68.
Google Scholar

Gopnik A. (2010). Dziecko filozofem. Trzcińska M. (trans.). Warszawa: Pruszyński i S-ka.
Google Scholar

Grabowski W. (2017), Fizyka chmur – awangarda meteorologii i klimatologii. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMq8Diu5608 (access: 20.11.2021).
Google Scholar

Gruszczyk-Kolczyńska E. (2013). Nauczycielska diagnoza edukacji matematycznej dzieci. Metody, interpretacje i wnioski. Warszawa: Nowa Era.
Google Scholar

Guz S. (1993). Rozumienie zjawisk przyrody nieożywionej przez dzieci sześcioletnie. “Wychowanie w Przedszkolu”, no 6, p. 323–329.
Google Scholar

Hannust T., Kikas E. (2012). Changes in children’s answers to open questions about the earth and gravity. “Child Development Research”, no 1, p. 89–104.
Google Scholar

Henriques L. (2002). Children’s Ideas About Weather: A Review of the Literature. “School Science and Mathematics”, no 102, p. 202–215. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18143.x.
Google Scholar

Jaszczuk I., Chrzanowski M., Zarzycka A. et al. (2018). Wątpliwe zmiany klimatu i straszny wilk. “Edukacja Biologiczna i Środowiskowa”, no 26, p. 16–41.
Google Scholar

Jelinek J.A. (2020). Dziecięca astronomia. Intuicje i zarysy pojęć astronomicznych: mity, wyniki badań i wnioski pedagogiczne. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej.
Google Scholar

Jelinek J.A. (2021). Children’s Astronomy. Development of the Shape of the Earth Concept in Polish Children between 5 and 10 Years of Age. “Education Sciences”, no 2, p. 75.
Google Scholar

Kambouri-Danos M., Ravanis K., Jameau A. et al. (2019). Precursor models and early years science learning: A case study related to the water state changes. „Early Childhood Education Journal”, no 4, s. 475–488.
Google Scholar

Kampeza M., Delserieys A. (2020). Acknowledging drawing as a mediating system for young children’s ideas concerning change of state of matter. “Review of Science, Mathematics and Ict Education”, no 2, p. 105–124.
Google Scholar

Klus-Stańska D. (2002). Narracje w szkole. In: Narracja jako sposób rozumienia świata. Klus-Stańska D. (eds.). Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, p. 189–220.
Google Scholar

Klus-Stańska D. (2019). Wiedza osobista uczniów jako punkt zwrotny w teorii i praktyce dydaktycznej. “Kwartalnik Pedagogiczny”, no 1, p. 7–20.
Google Scholar

Korolko M. (1990). Sztuka retoryki. Przewodnik encyklopedyczny. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Google Scholar

Kos E., Urbaniak-Zając D. (2013). Badania jakościowe w pedagogice. Wywiad narracyjny i obiektywna hermeneutyka. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar

Kulas P. (2014). Narracja jako przedmiot badań oraz kategoria teoretyczna w naukach społecznych. “Kultura i społeczeństwo”, no 4, p. 111–127.
Google Scholar

Lee K., Gjersoe N., O’Neill S. et al. (2020). Youth perceptions of climate change: A narrative synthesis. “WIREs Climate Change”, no 3.
Google Scholar

Lelonek M. (1984). Kształtowanie pojęć z przyrody nieożywionej w nauczaniu początkowym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Szkolne i Pedagogiczne.
Google Scholar

Malleus E., Kikas E., Marken T. (2017). Kindergarten and primary school children’s everyday, synthetic, and scientific concepts of clouds and rainfall. “Research in Science Education”, nr 3, s. 993–1011.
Google Scholar

Moyle R. (1980). Weather. Learning in Science Project. Working Paper No. 21. University of Waikato, Science Education Research Unit, Hamilton: New Zealand.
Google Scholar

Mółka M., Mółka J. (2018). Narracja źródłem wiedzy w pedagogice. “Horyzonty wychowania”, no 17, p. 111–123.
Google Scholar

Nowak-Dziemianowicz M. (2014). Narracja w pedagogice – znaczenie, badania, interpretacje. “Kultura i Edukacja”, no 2, p. 7–44.
Google Scholar

Platten L. (1995). Talking Geography: An investigation into young children’s understanding of geographical terms PART 1. “International Journal of Early Years Education”, no 1, p. 74–92.
Google Scholar

Russell T., Harlen W., Watt D. (1989). Children’s ideas about evaporation. ”International Journal of Science Education”, no 5, p. 566–576.
Google Scholar

Rybska E., Wiśniewska-Kin M. (2020). Świat w optyce dziecka. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
Google Scholar

Saçkes M., Flevares L.M., Trundle K.C. (2010). Four- to six-year-old children’s conceptions of the mechanism of rainfall. “Early Childhood Research Quarterly”, no 4, p. 536–546.
Google Scholar

Savva S. (2014). Year 3 to year 5 children’s conceptual understanding of the mechanism of rainfall: A comparative analysis. “Ikastorratza. e-Revista de Didáctica”, no 14, p. 1–13.
Google Scholar

Taiwo A.A., Ray H., Motswiri M. J. et al. (1999). Perceptions of the water cycle among primary school children in Botswana. “International Journal of Science Education”, no 4, p. 413–429.
Google Scholar

Wiśniewska-Kin M. (2016). Dziecięce rozumienie świata – w poszukiwaniu uzasadnienia postępowania badawczego. “Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji”, no 1, p. 59–70.
Google Scholar

Yang C., Noh T., Scharmann L.C. et al. (2014). A Study on the Elementary School Teachers’ Awareness of Students’ Alternative Conceptions about Change of States and Dissolution. “The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher”, no 3, p. 683–698.
Google Scholar