Werbalne działania nauczyciela wspierające uczenie się uczniów. Artykuł recenzyjny książki Urszuli Dernowskiej "<<Rusztowanie>> w procesie dydaktycznym. Studium nauczycielskiego scaffoldingu"

Aleksandra Tłuściak-Deliowska

doi:10.21697/fp.2023.2.12

Published: 2023-12-25

Vol. 13 No. 2 (2023)

Teacher’s Verbal Actions to Support Students’ Learning: A Review Article of Urszula Dernowska’s book “Scaffolding” in the Teaching Process: A Study of Teacher Scaffolding

Aleksandra Tłuściak-Deliowska

Pedagogical Forum

Section: Articles and essays

https://doi.org/10.21697/fp.2023.2.12

Abstract

The subject of the article is the teacher’s verbal activities supporting students’ learning in the classroom, and thus constituting a scaffold for their development, participation and deeper understanding of the explored topic, and as a result, their independence in thinking. A look at the “scaffolding” in the classroom environment will be achieved by referring to Urszula Dernowska’s book “<<Scaffolding>> in the didactic process. Teacher scaffolding study” (2022). This book deserves attention because it presents a diagnostic approach to actual communication events recorded during the lesson in natural conditions, in which the teacher is perceived as a participant in the lesson discourse. In addition, in the Polish scientific literature there is a noticeable lack of an exhaustive and monographic study directly exposing the issue of scaffolding in the school classroom. The article first considers the contemporary culture of learning and culture of thinking together with students, and then analyzes the cited scientific publication.

Keywords:

teacher, scaffolding, supporting learning, classroom discourse, student autonomy

Download files

pdf (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Tłuściak-Deliowska, A. (2023). Teacher’s Verbal Actions to Support Students’ Learning: A Review Article of Urszula Dernowska’s book “Scaffolding” in the Teaching Process: A Study of Teacher Scaffolding. Pedagogical Forum, 13(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.21697/fp.2023.2.12

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Alexander, R. (2008). Essays on pedagogy. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Amit, M., & Fried, M. N. (2005). Authority and authority relations in mathematics education: A view from an 8th grade classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58(2), 145–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-3618-2
Google Scholar

Anghileri, J. (2006). Scaffolding practices that enhance mathematics learning. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(1), 33–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-006-9005-9
Google Scholar

Baker, A. R., Lin, T., Chen, J., Paul, N., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen-Jahiel, K. (2017). Effects of teacher framing on student engagement during collaborative reasoning discussions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 51, 253–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.08.007
Google Scholar

Bal, M. (2009). Working with concepts. European Journal of English Studies, 13(1), 13–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13825570802708121
Google Scholar

Bleicher, R., Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. (2003). Opportunities to talk science in a high school chemistry classroom. Research in Science Education, 33(3), 319–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025480311414
Google Scholar

Bruner, J.S. (1975). From communication to language: A psychological perspective. Cognition, 3, 255–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(74)90012-2
Google Scholar

Brush, T. & Saye, J. (2001) The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(4), 333–356.
Google Scholar

Burns, C., & Myhill, D. (2004). Interactive or inactive? A consideration of the nature of interaction in whole class teaching. Cambridge Journal of Education, 34(1), 35–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764042000183115
Google Scholar

Buzzelli, C., & Johnston, B. (2001). Authority, power, and morality in classroom discourse. Teaching & Teacher Education, 17(8), 873–884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00037-3
Google Scholar

Davis, E. A. & Miyake, N. (2004) Explorations of scaffolding in complex classroom systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 265–272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1303_1
Google Scholar

De Guerrero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. S. (2000) Activating the ZPD: mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052
Google Scholar

Dernowska, U. (2022). „Rusztowanie” w procesie dydaktycznym. Studium nauczycielskiego scaffoldingu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo APS.
Google Scholar

Fernandez, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N. & Rojas-Drummond, S. (2001) Re-conceptualizing ‘scaffolding’ and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36(2), 40–54.
Google Scholar

Filipiak, E. (2015). Nauczanie rozwijające we wczesnej edukacji według Lwa S. Wygotskiego Od teorii do zmiany w praktyce. Bydgoszcz: Agencja Reklamowo-Wydawnicza ArtStudio.
Google Scholar

Gillies, R. (2016). Dialogic interactions in the cooperative classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 76, 178-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.009
Google Scholar

Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A systematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024
Google Scholar

LaParo, K. M., Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. (2004). The classroom assessment scoring system: Findings from the pre-kindergarten year. The Elementary School Journal, 104, 409–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/499760
Google Scholar

Littleton, K., & Howe, C. (Eds.). (2010). Educational Dialogues: Understanding and Promoting Productive interaction (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203863510
Google Scholar

Macleod, G., MacAllister, J., & Pirrie, A. (2012). Towards a broader understanding of authority in student–teacher relationships. Oxford Review of Education, 38(4), 493–508. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2012.716006
Google Scholar

Maybin, J., Mercer N., Stierer, B. (1992). “Scaffolding”: learning in the classroom. W: K. Norman (red.) Thinking voices: The work of the National Oracy Project (s. 186-195). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Google Scholar

Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.
Google Scholar

Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.137
Google Scholar

Mercer, N. (2008). Developing dialogue. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the C21st: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 141–153). Blackwell. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753545.ch11
Google Scholar

Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203946657
Google Scholar

Meyer, D. K. & Turner, J. C. (2002) Using instructional discourse analysis to study the scaffolding of student self-regulation. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 17–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3701_3
Google Scholar

Mieszalski S. (2007). Odmiany interakcyjności kształcenia. Ruch Pedagogiczny, 1-2, 5-12.
Google Scholar

Myhill, D. (2006). Talk, talk, talk: Teaching and learning in whole class discourse. Research Papers in Education, 21(1), 19–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520500445425
Google Scholar

Myhill, D., Fisher, R. (2005). Informing practice in English: A review of recent research in literacy and the teaching of English. London: Her Majesty’s Inspectorate.
Google Scholar

Nathan, M. J. & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 175–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI2102_03
Google Scholar

Nowak, J. (2013). Edukacyjny potencjał dialogu w przestrzeni klasy szkolnej, [w:] H. Krauze-Sikorska, M. Klichowski, K. Kuszak (red.) Świat małego dziecka (ss. 85-96). Tom II. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.
Google Scholar

Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Keeping the metaphor of scaffolding fresh – A response to C. Addison Stone’s ‘The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities’. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 370–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100406
Google Scholar

Pawan, F. (2008). Content-area teachers and scaffolded instruction for English language learners. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1450–1462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.003
Google Scholar

Pirrie, A., & Rafanell, I. (2020). Re-conceptualising authority relations in education: A micro-situational approach. Critical Studies in Education, 61(1), 101–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2017.1343198
Google Scholar

Puntambekar, S. (2022). Distributed scaffolding: scaffolding students in classroom environments. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 451-472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09636-3
Google Scholar

Reinsvold, L., & Cochran, K. (2012). Power dynamics and questioning in elementary science classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 745–768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-011-9235-2
Google Scholar

Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, R. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Smit, J., van Eerde, H. A. A., & Bakker, A. (2013). A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British Educational Research Journal, 39(5), 817–834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3007
Google Scholar

Sterna, D. (2008). Ocenianie kształtujące w praktyce. Warszawa: Centrum Edukacji Obywatelskiej.
Google Scholar

Stone, C.A. (1998). Should we salvage the scaffolding metaphor? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31(4), 409–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949803100411
Google Scholar

Tobin, K. (2006). Learning to teach through coteaching and cogenerative dialogue. Teaching Education, 17(2), 133–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210600680358
Google Scholar

van de Pol, J., Volman, M. & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar

Wells, G., & Arauz, R. (2006). Dialogue in the classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 379–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1503_3
Google Scholar

Williams, S. & Baxter, J. (1996) Dilemmas of discourse-oriented teaching in one middle school mathematics classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 21–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/461847
Google Scholar

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Google Scholar

Wood, D., Wood, H., & Middleton, D. (1978). An experimental evaluation of four face-to-face teaching strategies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1(2), 131–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016502547800100203
Google Scholar

Aleksandra Tłuściak-Deliowska

adeliowska@aps.edu.pl

Affiliation:

Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. M. Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie Poland

Bio Statement (e.g., department and rank)

Dr hab. Aleksandra Tłuściak-Deliowska – profesor w Akademii Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie. Kieruje Szkołą Doktorską APS oraz Zespołem Badań Kultury Szkoły i Procesu Kształcenia działającym w Instytucie Pedagogiki APS. Autorka ponad osiemdziesięciu prac naukowych, w których koncentruje się na środowisku szkolnym, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem klimatu i kultury szkoły oraz problemu przemocy rówieśniczej. Wielokrotnie brała udział jako prelegentka na krajowych i międzynarodowych konferencjach.