Do the Weak Have a Right to Fight the Strong? Moral Absolutes and the Probability of Success

Stipe Buzar

doi:10.21697/spch.2024.60.A.11

Published: 2024-12-31

Vol. 60 No. 2 (2024)

Do the Weak Have a Right to Fight the Strong? Moral Absolutes and the Probability of Success

Stipe Buzar

Studia Philosophiae Christianae

Section: Papers

https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2024.60.A.11

Abstract

The jus ad bellum requirement of the probability of success can be perceived as an unjust requirement which prohibits the weaker side of a potential or actual military conflict from committing itself to organized violence, even to defend and protect its own survival. This view of the probability of success as an unjust requirement, however, need only be held if: (1) the goal of the weaker state is survival itself. In cases when (1) is true, the requirement should be considered void. On the other hand, if: (2) survival is not considered an overriding factor, then the requirement stands. This paper explores the latter position using the example of the famous Melian Dialogue from Thucydides’ History of the Peloponnesian War, and applies it to the question of Ukraine’s right to war and their government’s possible moral obligation to negotiate in their current defensive war against Russia.

----------------------------------------

Received: 26/04/2024. Reviewed: 12/06/2024. Accepted: 5/11/2024.

Keywords:

jus ad bellum, probability of success, moral absolutes, political goals

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Buzar, S. (2024). Do the Weak Have a Right to Fight the Strong? Moral Absolutes and the Probability of Success. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 60(2), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2024.60.A.11

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Bajt, M., Buzar, S. (2023). The Russian World as a Moral Community and Foreign Policy Doctrine. International Studies, 23(1), 25-42. https://hrcak.srce.hr/304231.
Google Scholar

Buzar, S. (2020). Realizam i teorija pravednog rata. Disput/NZCG.
Google Scholar

Buzar, S. (2023). War Against the ‘Empire of Lies’: The Moral-Eschatological Perspective in Alexandr Dugin’s Geopolitical Thought and Putin’s ‘Special Military Operation’. Annals of the Croatian Political Science Association, 20(1), 205-220. https://hrcak.srce.hr/clanak/434465.
Google Scholar

Carr, E.H. (1946). The Twenty Years Crisis 1919-1939. An Introduction Into the Study of International Relations. MacMillan.
Google Scholar

Clausevitz, K. von. (2007). On War. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Hanson, V.D. (2024). The End of Everything: How Wars Descend into Annihilation. Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Harbour, F. (2011). Reasonable Probability of Success as a Moral Criterion in the Western Just War Tradition. Journal of Military Ethics, 10(3), 230-241. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15027570.2011.608497.
Google Scholar

Kotkin, S. (2024). How Ukraine Can Win Peace: A Conversation. https://www.hoover.org/research/how-ukraine-can-win-peace-conversation-stephen-kotkin.
Google Scholar

Machiavelli, N. (2005). The Prince. Oxford World’s Classics.
Google Scholar

Morgenthau, H.J. (2005). Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. McGraw Hill Higher Education.
Google Scholar

Ramsey, P. (2002). The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility. Rowman and Littlefield.
Google Scholar

Thucydides. (2004). History of the Peloponnesian War. Dover Publications Inc.
Google Scholar

Waltz, K.N. (1988). The Origins of War in Neorealist Theory. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 18(4), 615-628. https://www.jstor.org/stable/204817.
Google Scholar