Why metaphysics matters for the science-theology debate – an incarnational case study

Finley I. Lawson

doi:10.21697/spch.2020.56.3.06

Published: 2020-06-30

Vol. 56 No. 3 (2020)

Why metaphysics matters for the science-theology debate – an incarnational case study

Finley I. Lawson

Studia Philosophiae Christianae

Section: Papers

https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2020.56.3.06

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between science and theology within a critical realist framework. Focusing on the role of metaphysics as a unifying starting point, especially in consideration of theological issues that are concerned with corporeality and temporality (such as in the incarnation). Some metaphysical challenges that lead to the appearance of “paradox” in the incarnation are highlighted, and the implications of two forms of holistic scientific ontology on the appearance of a paradox in the incarnation are explored. It is concluded that ultimately both science and theology are concerned with the nature of reality, and the search for coherent models that can describe the unseen. Whilst one should maintain a criticality to any realist conception of theological and scientific theories, a shared metaphysics ensures theological doctrine can continue to be interpreted with relevance in a world in which scientific thought is increasingly stretching into the meta-scientific.

-------------

Received: 03/05/2020. Reviewed: 12/06/2020. Accepted: 30/06/2020

Keywords:

critical realism, holism, incarnation, Christology, paradox

Download files

PDF

Citation rules

Lawson, F. I. (2020). Why metaphysics matters for the science-theology debate – an incarnational case study. Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 56(3), 125–155. https://doi.org/10.21697/spch.2020.56.3.06

Cited by / Share

References

Anderson J., Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of Its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status, (Series: Paternoster Theological Monographs), Paternoster, Milton Keynes 2007.
Google Scholar

Barbour I.G., Commentary on Theological Resources from the Physical Sciences, Zygon 1(1966)1, 27-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1966.tb00430.x
Google Scholar

Barbour I.G., Issues in Science and Religion, Harper Collins, London 1971.
Google Scholar

Barbour, I.G, Religion in an Age of Science, SCM Press, London 1990.
Google Scholar

Basinger D., Biblical Paradox: Does Revelation Challenge Logic?, Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 30(1987)2, 205-213.
Google Scholar

Baugus B.P., Paradox and Mystery in Theology, The Heythrop Journal 54(2013)2, 238-251. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.2011.00735.x
Google Scholar

Bhaskar R., The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Kritique of the Contemporary Human Science, Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York 19892.
Google Scholar

Chakravartty A., Scientific Ontology, Oxford University Press 2020.
Google Scholar

Cooper J.W., Body, Soul, and Life Everlasting: Biblical Anthropology and the Monism-Dualism Debate, Eerdmans, Grand Rapids 2000.
Google Scholar

Cross R., The Metaphysics of the Incarnation: Thomas Aquinas to Duns Scotus, Oxford University Press, New York 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244362.001.0001
Google Scholar

Daley B.E., Nature and the “Mode of Union”: Late Patristic Models for the Personal Unity of Christ, in: The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God, eds. S.T. Davis, D. Kendall, G. O’Collins, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004, 164-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248451.003.0008
Google Scholar

Dodds M.J., Science, Causality, and God: Divine Action and Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum 91(2014)1, 13-36.
Google Scholar

Esfeld M., Holism in Philosophy of Mind and Philosophy of Physics, (Synthese Library, Vol. 298), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht – Boston 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1787-8
Google Scholar

Esfeld M., Philosophical Holism, in: UNESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support System, Social Sciences and Humanities, 2013, (http://www.unil.ch/files/live//sites/philo/files/shared/EOLSS-PhilHolism03.pdf), [accessed 10/2015].
Google Scholar

Esfeld M., Philosophical Holism, in: Unity of Knowledge (in Transdisciplinary Research for Sustainability), Vol. 1., ed. G. Hirsch Hardon, Eolss Publishers, Oxford 2009), 110-27
Google Scholar

Esfeld M., Quantum Entanglement and a Metaphysics of Relations, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35(2004)4, 601-617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2004.04.008
Google Scholar

Goetz S., Substance Dualism, in: The Ashgate Research Companion to Theological Anthropology, eds. J.R. Farris, Ch. Taliaferro, Ashgate, Burlington 2015), 125-137.
Google Scholar

Grounds V.C., The Postulate of Paradox, Bulletin of the Evangelical Theological Society 7(1964), 3-21.
Google Scholar

Koons R.C., Bealer G. (eds.), The Waning of Materialism, Oxford University Press, New York 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199556182.001.0001
Google Scholar

Lawson F., ‘Complete in Manhood’ – Understanding Christ’s Humanity in Light of Quantum Holism, in: Studies in Science and Theology: Yearbook of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, eds. by D. Evers, M. Fuller, A. Runnehov, K.-W. Saether, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg 2018, xvi, 127-142.
Google Scholar

Lawson F., Denying the Binary: A Non-Boolean Approach to Queer Bodies in Theology, in: Reforming Practical Theology. The Politics of Body and Space, (International Academy of Practical Theology Conference Series), Index Theologicus, Tübingen 2019, i, 45-52.
Google Scholar

Lawson F. ‘He Who Descended Is Himself Also He Who Ascended’ – Exploring the Identity of the Son of God in Light of Quantum Holism, in: Forty Years of Science and Religion, eds. N. Spurway, L. Hickman, Cambridge Scholars Publishing 2016, 179-186.
Google Scholar

Lawson F., ‘Not Three Gods but One’ – Why Reductionism Doesn’t Serve Our Theological Discourse, Athens Journal of Humanities and Arts 6(2019)1, 85-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30958/ajha.6-1-5
Google Scholar

Le Poidevin R., Incarnation: Metaphysical Issues, Philosophy Compass, 4(2009)4, 703-714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00222.x
Google Scholar

Leftow B., The Humanity of God, in: The Metaphysics of the Incarnation, eds. A. Marmodoro, J. Hill, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2011, 20-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583164.003.0002
Google Scholar

Leidenhag M., Emergence, Realism and the Good Life, in: Issues in Science and Theology: What Is Life?, eds. D. Evers, M. Fuller, A. Jackelén, K.-W. Sæther, European Conference on Science and Theology, and European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, Issues in Science and Religion, Springer, Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London 2015, 87-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17407-5_7
Google Scholar

Losch A., On the Origins of Critical Realism, Theology and Science 7(2009)1, 85-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700802617105
Google Scholar

Maudlin T., Part and Whole in Quantum Mechanics, in: Interpreting Bodies: Classical and Quantum Objects in Modern Physics, ed. E. Castellani Princeton University Press, Princeton 1998, 46-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691222042-006
Google Scholar

Maudlin T., The Metaphysics within Physics, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009.
Google Scholar

McGrath A.E., The Territories of Human Reason: Science and Theology in an Age of Multiple Rationalities, OUP Oxford, New York 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813101.001.0001
Google Scholar

Merricks T., The Word Made Flesh: Dualism, Physicalism, and the Incarnation, in Persons: Human and Divine, eds. P. van Inwagen, D. Zimmerman, Oxford University Press, New York 2007, 281-300.
Google Scholar

Murphy N.C., From Critical Realism to a Methodological Approach: Response to Robbins, Van Huyssteen, and Hefner, Zygon 23(1988)3, 287-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1988.tb00634.x
Google Scholar

Nurnberger K., Dust of the Ground and Breath of Life (Gen2:7): The Notion of “life” in Ancient Israel and Emergence Theory, in: Issues in Science and Theology: What Is Life?, eds. D. Evers, M. Fuller, A. Jackelén, K.-W. Sæther, European Conference on Science and Theology, and European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, Issues in Science and Religion, Springer, Cham – Heidelberg – New York – Dordrecht – London 2015, 101-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17407-5_8
Google Scholar

Primas H., Non-Boolean Descriptions for Mind-Matter Problems, Mind and Matter 5(2007)1, 7-44.
Google Scholar

Robinson H., Substance, in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta, (https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/substance/), [accessed 09/2020].
Google Scholar

Stapp H.P., Quantum Reality and Mind, in: Quantum Physics of Consciousness, eds. S. Kak, R. Penrose, S. Hameroff, Cosmology Science Publishers, Cambridge 2011, 290-470.
Google Scholar

Stump E., Aquinas’ Metaphysics of the Incarnation, in: The Incarnation: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Incarnation of the Son of God, (Proceedings of the Incarnation Summit, Held Apr. 23 – 26, 2000 at Dunwoodie, Yonkers, N.Y.), eds. S.T. Davis, D. Kendall, G. O’Collins, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2004, 197-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248451.003.0009
Google Scholar

Taylor Ch., A Secular Age, Harvard University Press, Cambridge 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvxrpz54
Google Scholar

Tillich P., Relation of Metaphysics and Theology, The Review of Metaphysics 10(1956)1, 57-63.
Google Scholar

Torrance T.F., Theological Science, Vol. 1, Clark, Edinburgh 1996.
Google Scholar

Woodfin Y., Ontological Thresholds and Christological Method, Religious Studies 8(1972)2, 137-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412500005655
Google Scholar