In this paper author addresses the problem of justifying Steven French’s eliminative ontic structural realism by the metaphysical underdetermination argument. Author's main goal is to show that there are underlying strategies in the argument and that they are questionable. He provides arguments for this claim and concludes that while the metaphysical thesis of eliminative ontic structural realism is dismissible, French’s views can be characterized without it – at a very high price, however.
This website uses cookies for proper operation, in order to use the portal fully you must accept cookies.
English
Język Polski