Altruizm w kontekście ekonomicznym – analiza wybranych modeli i badań ekonomii behawioralnej

Magdalena Wasilewska

doi:10.21697/ucs.2022.29.1.06

Published: 2022-06-30

Vol. 29 No. 1 (2022)

Altruism in an economic context – analysis of selected models and research of behavioral economics

Magdalena Wasilewska

Academic Journal of Sociology

Section: Articles

https://doi.org/10.21697/ucs.2022.29.1.06

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to outline the theory, direction, and results of research on altruism and pro-social behaviour in economics. The text presents the basic assumptions of neoclassical economics, which assumes that decision-makers are selfish, rational and maximize their utility, and then behavioural economics, which is an alternative view of the rationality of individuals when faced with economic choices. The methodology and results of research on altruism in experimental economics using the ultimatum game, the dictator game, and the public good game are then discussed. The final part of the paper describes selected forms of the utility function proposed by behavioural economics, taking into account that the utility of economic decisionmakers is not only affected by their own well-being or wealth, but also by the situation and welfare of others.

Keywords:

altruism, behavioural economics, social preferences, inequity aversion

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Wasilewska, M. (2022). Altruism in an economic context – analysis of selected models and research of behavioral economics. Academic Journal of Sociology, 29(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.21697/ucs.2022.29.1.06

Cited by / Share

Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Aggarwal P., O’Brien C.L. (2008), Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. „Journal of Marketing Education” 30(3): 255–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283
Google Scholar

Andreoni J. (1989), Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. „Journal of Political Economy”, 97(6): 1447–1458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/261662
Google Scholar

Andreoni J. (1990), Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. „The Economic Journal”, 100(401): 464–477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2234133
Google Scholar

Andreoni J. (1995), Cooperation in public-goods experiments: kindness or confusion? “The American Economic Review”, Vol. 85, No. 4: 891–904.
Google Scholar

Andreoni J., Miller J. (2002), Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. „Econometrica”, 70(2): 737–753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00302
Google Scholar

Andreoni J., Rao J.M. (2011), The power of asking: How communication affects selfishness, empathy, and altruism. „Journal of Public Economics”, 95(7–8): 513–520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.12.008
Google Scholar

Andreoni J., Rao J.M., Trachtman H. (2017), Avoiding the ask: A field experiment on altruism, empathy, and charitable giving. „Journal of Political Economy”, 125(3): 625–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/691703
Google Scholar

Annett A. (2018), Restoring Ethics to Economics: Modern economics should return to its roots. „Finance & Development”, 55(1): 54–57.
Google Scholar

Atkinson A.B. (2009), Economics as a moral science. „Economica”, 76: 791–804. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2009.00788.x
Google Scholar

Becker G.S. (1981), Altruism in the Family and Selfishness in the Market Place. „Economica”, 48(189): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2552939
Google Scholar

Bekkers R. (2007, December), Measuring altruistic behavior in surveys: The all-or-nothing dictator game. „In Survey Research Methods”, Vol. 1, No. 3: 139–144.
Google Scholar

Blanchard O.J. (1991), Neoclassical synthesis [w:] J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, P. Newman (ed.), In The world of economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 504–510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21315-3_66
Google Scholar

Bohnet I., Frey B.S. (1999), Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment. „American Economic Review”, 89(1): 335–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.335
Google Scholar

Bolton G.E., Katok E., Zwick R. (1998), Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindness. „International Journal of Game Theory”, 27(2): 269–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001820050072
Google Scholar

Brekke K.A., Johansson-Stenman O. (2008), The behavioural economics of climate change. „Oxford Review of Economic Policy”, 24(2): 280–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grn012
Google Scholar

Brethel-Haurwitz K.M., Stoycos S.A., Cardinale E.M., Huebner B., Marsh A.A. (2016), Is costly punishment altruistic? Exploring rejection of unfair offers in the Ultimatum Game in real-world altruists. „Scientific Reports”, 6(1): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18974
Google Scholar

Cappelen A.W., Nielsen U.H., Sørensen E.Ø., Tungodden B., Tyran J.R. (2013), Give and take in dictator games. „Economics Letters”, 118(2): 280–283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.10.030
Google Scholar

Czapiński J. (2012), Ekonomia szczęścia i psychologia bogactwa. „Nauka”, (1): 51–88.
Google Scholar

van Damme E. (1995), Game theory: the next stage. Center for Economic Research, Tilburg University.
Google Scholar

Dhami S. (2020), The Foundations of Behavioral Economic Analysis: Volume VII:, Further Topics in Behavioral Economics (Vol. 7). Oxford University Press, USA.
Google Scholar

Dudek M. (2011), Przedsiębiorczość w perspektywie koncepcji zakorzenienia działania ekonomicznego. „Studia Socjologiczne”, 203(4): 155–176.
Google Scholar

Eckel C.C., Grossman P.J. (1996), Altruism in anonymous dictator games. „Games and Economic Behavior”, 16(2): 181–191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1996.0081
Google Scholar

Edele A., Dziobek I., Keller M. (2013), Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game: The role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity. „Learning and Individual Differences”, 24: 96–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.12.020
Google Scholar

Everett J.A., Faber N.S., Crockett M. (2015), Preferences and beliefs in ingroup favoritism. „Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience”, Vol. 9, Article 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00015
Google Scholar

Evren Ö., Minardi S. (2017), Warm‐glow Giving and Freedom to be Selfish. „The Economic Journal”, 127(603): 1381–1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12351
Google Scholar

Fehr E., Gächter S. (2002), Altruistic punishment in humans. „Nature”, 415(6868): 137–140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/415137a
Google Scholar

Fehr E., Schmidt K.M. (1999), A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. „The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 114(3): 817–868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003355399556151
Google Scholar

Forsythe R., Horowitz J.L., Savin N.E., Sefton M. (1994), Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. „Games and Economic Behavior”, 6(3): 347–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1994.1021
Google Scholar

Gualda E. (2022). Altruism, Solidarity and Responsibility from a Committed Sociology: Contributions to Society. „The American Sociologist”, 53(1): 29–43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09504-1
Google Scholar

Güth W., Schmittberger R., Schwarze B. (1982), An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. „Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization”, 3(4): 367–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
Google Scholar

Harrison G.W., List J.A. (2004), Field experiments. „Journal of Economic Literature”, 42(4): 1009–1055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/0022051043004577
Google Scholar

Harrison G.W., McCabe K.A. (1996), Expectations and fairness in a simple bargaining experiment. „International Journal of Game Theory”, 25(3): 303–327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02425260
Google Scholar

Harsanyi J.C. (1961), On the rationality postulates underlying the theory of cooperative games. „Journal of Conflict Resolution”, 5(2): 179–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276100500205
Google Scholar

Holt C.A., Roth A.E. (2004), The Nash equilibrium: A perspective. „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences”, 101(12): 3999–4002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0308738101
Google Scholar

Jahan S., Mahmud A.S., Papageorgiou C. (2014), Back to Basics: What Is Keynesian Economics? – The central tenet of this school of thought is that government intervention can stabilize the economy. „Finance & Development”, 51(003).
Google Scholar

Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979), Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. „Econometrica”, 47(2): 263–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Google Scholar

Kapteyn A. (1985), Utility and economics. „De Economist”, 133(1): 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01675959
Google Scholar

Levine D.K. (1998). Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. „Review of Economic Dynamics”, 1(3): 593–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/redy.1998.0023
Google Scholar

Li O., Xu F., Wang L. (2018), Advantageous inequity aversion does not always exist: the role of determining allocations modulates preferences for advantageous inequity. „Frontiers in Psychology”, Vol. 9, Article 749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00749
Google Scholar

Lipowski A. (2011), Z metodologii nauk ekonomicznych: struktura logiczna ujęcia pozytywnego i normatywnego. „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 73 (2): 195–217.
Google Scholar

von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1947), Theory of games and economic behavior, 2nd rev., Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar

Noor J. (2009), Hyperbolic discounting and the standard model: Eliciting discount functions. „Journal of Economic Theory”, 144(5): 2077–2083. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2009.03.005
Google Scholar

Osborne M.J. (2004). An introduction to game theory (Vol. 3, No. 3). New York: Oxford University Press, p. 158.
Google Scholar

Palfrey T.R., Prisbrey J.E. (1997), Anomalous behavior in public goods experiments: How much and why?. „The American Economic Review”, Vol. 87, No. 5: 829–846.
Google Scholar

Pawłowski B. (1994), Altruizm jako fenomen biologiczny. „Kosmos”, 43(2): 191–200.
Google Scholar

Pereda M., Tamarit I., Antonioni A., Cuesta J.A., Hernández P., Sánchez A. (2019), Large scale and information effects on cooperation in public good games. „Scientific Reports”, 9(1): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50964-w
Google Scholar

Pillutla M.M., Murnighan J.K. (1996), Unfairness, anger, and spite: Emotional rejections of ultimatum offers. „Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes”, 68(3): 208–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0100
Google Scholar

Podder S., Righi S., Pancotto F. (2021), Reputation and punishment sustain cooperation in the optional public goods game. „Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B”, 376(1838): 20200293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0293
Google Scholar

Pūce L. (2019), Criticism of Behavioral Economics: Attacks towards ideology, Evidence and Practical Application. „Journal of WEI Business and Economics”, 8(1): 32–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36739/jweibe.2019.v8.i1.3
Google Scholar

Randall A. (2013), Environmental ethics for environmental economists [w:] J. Shogren, J. Shortle, (eds.), Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, pp. 25–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375067-9.00144-3
Google Scholar

Rushton J.P. (1982), Altruism and society: A social learning perspective. „Ethics”, 92(3): 425–446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/292353
Google Scholar

Samuelson P.A. (1937), A note on measurement of utility. „The Review of Economic Studies”, 4(2): 155–161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2967612
Google Scholar

Schilizzi S. (2000), The economics of ethical behaviour and environmental management. AARES 2000 Sydney 44th Annual Conference of the AARES, January 23–25, 2000.
Google Scholar

Serra D. (2012), The Experimental method in economics: old issues and new challenges. „Revue de philosophie économique”, 13(1): 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/rpec.131.0003
Google Scholar

Silk J.B., House B.R. (2016), The evolution of altruistic social preferences in human groups. „Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences”, 371(1687): 20150097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0097
Google Scholar

Slantchev B.L. (2009), Game Theory: Elements of Basic Models. University of California, San.
Google Scholar

Slonim R., Roth, A.E. (1998), Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak Republic. „Econometrica”, Vol. 66, No. 3: 569–596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2998575
Google Scholar

Szyszka A. (2009), Behawioralne aspekty kryzysu finansowego. „Bank i Kredyt”, 40(4): 5–30.
Google Scholar

Taylor T. (2014), Economics and morality. „Finance & Development”, 51(002).
Google Scholar

Thaler R.H. (2000), From homo economicus to homo sapiens. „Journal of Economic Perspectives”, 14(1): 133–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.1.133
Google Scholar

Varian H.R. (1992) Microeconomic Analysis. Third Edition, W.W. Norton and Company, Inc., New York, 1–22, p. 95.
Google Scholar

Veblen T. (1900), The preconceptions of economic science. „The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 14(2): 240–269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1883770
Google Scholar

Wang Y., Ge J., Zhang H., Wang H., Xie X. (2020), Altruistic behaviors relieve physical pain. „Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences”, 117(2): 950–958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911861117
Google Scholar

Weintraub E.R. (2007), Neoclassical Economics. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/NeoclassicalEconomics.html [dostęp 29.04.2022].
Google Scholar

Weiß M., Rodrigues J., Paelecke M., Hewig J. (2020), We, Them, and It: Dictator Game Offers Depend on Hierarchical Social Status, Artificial Intelligence, and Social Dominance. „Frontiers in Psychology”, Vol. 11, Article 541756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.541756
Google Scholar

Winking J., Mizer N. (2013), Natural-field dictator game shows no altruistic giving. „Evolution and Human Behavior”, 34(4): 288–293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.04.002
Google Scholar

Włodarczyk J. (2012), Współczesna ekonomia heterodoksyjna – wybrane zagadnienia [w:] S. Czaja, A. Becla, J. Włodarczyk, T. Poskrobko, Wyzwania współczesnej ekonomii. Wybrane problemy. Warszawa: Difin: 138–147.
Google Scholar

Zaleśkiewicz T. (2011), Psychologia ekonomiczna. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Google Scholar