JAK RELIGIJNI? WNIOSKI Z WYWIADÓW KOGNITYWNYCH DLA BADANIA RELIGIJNOŚCI POLAKÓW

Marta Bożewicz

Published: 2018-11-26

Vol. 17 No. 4 (2016)

How religious? Conclusions of cognitive interviews for research about religiosity of Poles

Marta Bożewicz

Abstract

The transformation of religion, described both from the theoretical perspective, as well as in the literaturebased on the results of empirical research, there is much harder to capture using a survey. Perhaps thestatistics – inherently conservative – are not able to illustrate the change, of the meaning of the conceptscontained in the survey questions.Cognitive interview methods have been developed since 1980s, to pre-test questionnaires to identifypotential sources of response error and to ensure clarity and relevance (Willis 1999, Collins 2003, Drennan2003, Tourangeau 1984). They can also be used to assess the coherence and problems with wording andframing of existing questions, images and information. Utilizing cognitive interviewing techniques leads tounderstanding how the questions or tasks are perceived and interpreted from the respondent’s perspective.In this paper I present the results of the study of using cognitive interviews on questions about the religiosity.The paper presents the diversity of religious Poles, discovers understanding of terms used in survey questionsabout the religiosity from the WVS, CBOS or ISKK polls and the way of arriving at an answer. It alsomentions the consequences for the interpretation of the change of religiosity in Poland.

Keywords:

religiosity, survey, cognitive interview, understanding concepts, interpreting questionnaires

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Bożewicz, M. (2018). How religious? Conclusions of cognitive interviews for research about religiosity of Poles. Academic Journal of Sociology, 17(4). Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/ucs/article/view/2907

Cited by / Share

References

Beatty P., Willis G. (2007), Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing. „Public Opinion Quarterly”: 71, s. 287–311.
Google Scholar

Boeije H.R., Willis G. (2011), Introducing the CIRF: A framework for reporting cognitive interviewing studies. Paper presented at the European Survey Research Association, Lausanne, Swiss.
Google Scholar

Buers C., Triemstra M., Bloemendala E., Zwijnenberga N.C., Hendriksa M., Delnoijc D.M. (2014), The value of cognitive interviewing for optimizing a patient experience survey. „International Journal of Social Research Methodology”: 17(4), s. 325–340.
Google Scholar

CBOS (2012), Metoda i znaczenie. Problematyka rozumienia w badaniach sondażowych, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

CBOS (2015), Kanon wiary Polaków. Komunikat z badań (oprac. R. Boguszewski). Warszawa.
Google Scholar

CBOS (2015), Zmiany w zakresie podstawowych wskaźników religijności Polaków po śmierci Jana Pawła II. Komunikat z badań (oprac. R. Boguszewski). Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Collins D. (2003), Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. „Quality of Life Research”: 12, s. 229–238.
Google Scholar

Drennan J. (2003), Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. „Journal of Advanced Nursing”: 42(1), s. 57–63.
Google Scholar

Ericsson K.A., Simon H.A. (1980), Verbal reports as data. „Psychological Review”: 87, s. 215–250.
Google Scholar

Grabowska M., Szawiel T. (red.) (2005), Religijność społeczeństwa polskiego lat 80. Warszawa, pierwsze wydanie: 1989, na prawach rękopisu.
Google Scholar

Grzeszkiewicz-Radulska K. (2012), Metody badań pilotażowych. „Acta Universitatis Lodziensis Folia Sociologica”: 42, s. 113–141.
Google Scholar

Hofmeyer A., Sheingold B. H., Taylor R. (2015), Do You Understand What I Mean? How Cognitive Interviewing Can Strengthen Valid, Reliable Study Instruments And Dissemination Products. „Journal of International Education Research”: 11 (4), s. 261–267.
Google Scholar

Knafl K., Deatrick J., Gallo A., Holcombe G., Bakitas M., Dixon J. (2007), The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. „Research in Nursing & Health”: 30, s. 224–234.
Google Scholar

Levine R., Fowler F. Jr., Brown J. (2005), Role of cognitive testing in the development of the CAHPS hospital survey. „Health Research and Educational Trust”: 40, s. 2037–2056.
Google Scholar

Loftus E. (1984), Protocol Analysis of Responses to Survey Recall Questions. [w:] T. Jabine, M. Straf, J. Tanur, R. Tourangeau (red.), Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Google Scholar

Mariański J., Zaręba S.H. (2002), Metodologiczne problemy badań nad religijnością. Ząbki: Apostolicum.
Google Scholar

Presser S., Couper M., Lessler J., Martin E., Rothgeb J., Singer E. (2004), Methods for testing and evaluating survey questions. „Public Opinion Quarterly”: 68, s. 109–130.
Google Scholar

Priede C., Farral S. (2011), Comparing results from different styles of cognitive interviewing: ‘Verbal probing’ vs. ‘thinking aloud’. „International Journal of Social Research Methodology”: 14, s. 271–287.
Google Scholar

Tourangeau R. (1984), Cognitive sciences and survey methods. [w:] T. Jabine, M. Straf, J. Tanur, R. Tourangeau (red.), Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Google Scholar

Tyrała R. (2014), Bez Boga na co dzień. Socjologia ateizmu i niewiary. Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy Nomos.
Google Scholar

Van Someren M.W., Bernard Y.F., Sanberg A.C. (1994), The think aloud method. A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. London: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Willis G. (1999), Cognitive interviewing a ‘how to guide’. Reducing survey error through research on the cognitive and design processes in surveys. Short course presented at the 1999 meeting of the American Statistical Association. Rockville, MD: Research Triangle Institute.
Google Scholar

Willis G. (2004), Cognitive Interviewing Revisited: A Useful Technique, in Theory? [w:] S. Presser, M. Couper, J. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Rothgeb, E. Singer (red.), Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires. New York: Wiley.
Google Scholar