Spirituality in the cognitive process and the regulation of digital behaviour: human ethics and machine learning

Nadezhda Nikolaevna Pokrovskaia; Albina Ahmetovna Beschasnaya; Stanislav Vladimirovich Boiko

doi:10.21697/ucs.2019.25.2.03

Opublikowane: 2019-12-31

Tom 25 Nr 2 (2019)

Spirituality in the cognitive process and the regulation of digital behaviour: human ethics and machine learning

Nadezhda Nikolaevna Pokrovskaia , Albina Ahmetovna Beschasnaya , Stanislav Vladimirovich Boiko

Uniwersyteckie Czasopismo Socjologiczne

Dział: Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/ucs.2019.25.2.03

Abstrakt

Regulation models based on the human cognitive systems and ethics are embodied in social institutions. Among the issues of the processes of urbanization, secularization, anti-war speeches, the fight against poverty and discrimination, spirituality became an important subject of research especially in the Post-Soviet sociological space, where the common elements of the social development were widely represented in different kinds of research, but the impact of religion and spiritual activity was underappreciated and was almost not studied. Some of the approaches and terms were borrowed from the Western sociology, as well as the liberal approach of market economy was initially studied on the basis of materials copied from American and European textbooks. Very soon scholars discovered that the notion of spirituality had different connotations on the territory of the former Soviet republics, where the hunger for spirituality was inherited (Mariański 2009: 149-179) since the omnipresent and ubiquitous communist ideology concerned the social life, including the religious activity of the populations of the former Soviet Union regions. Spirituality also began to awaken interest of social science as the knowledge of the organization of social life. Since the USSR collapse, the concepts of, spirituality as well as new spirituality become an important novelty for the sociological science, sociological reviews and conferences. At the same time, spirituality started to be used as an argument in the political and economic discussions that provoked the critics of this concept among scholars as well as inspired scepticism in society. The presented paper deals with the cognitive approach and combines the sociological approach with analysis of spirituality and the economic analysis of the intellectual systems and computing machines, especially, the “cognitive” processes of machine learning with the use of software for human beings to determine the requirements for the regulation mechanisms of the behavior human beings and machines in the digital era.

Pobierz pliki

PDF (English)

Zasady cytowania

Nikolaevna Pokrovskaia, N., Ahmetovna Beschasnaya, A., & Vladimirovich Boiko, S. (2019). Spirituality in the cognitive process and the regulation of digital behaviour: human ethics and machine learning. Uniwersyteckie Czasopismo Socjologiczne, 25(2), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.21697/ucs.2019.25.2.03

Cited by / Share

Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.

Bibliografia

Ababkova M.U., Pokrovskaia N.N. (2016), Communication policies and intellectual property transfer: efficiency and security in the post-modern information society. Conference Security issues in the modern societies. Yerevan: YSU publishing, pp. 93-99.
Google Scholar

Ababkova M.U., Kostin G.A., Pokrovskaia N.N. (2017), Master-chain as an intellectual governing system for producing and transfer of knowledge. Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Control in Technical Systems, CTS 2017. – IEEE Explore, pp. 71-74.
Google Scholar

Ababkova M.Yu., Pokrovskaia N.N., Trostinskaya I.R. (2018), Neuro-Technologies For Knowledge Transfer And Experience Communication. “The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences” (EpSBS), no. XXXV, pp. 10-18.
Google Scholar

Banafa A. (2016), The Internet of Everything (IoE). OpenMind, 29 August 2016. – URL: https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/en/the-internet-of-everything-ioe (retrieved 12.11. 2018).
Google Scholar

Belk R.W., Wallendorf M., Sherry J.F., Jr. (1989), The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey. „Journal of Consumer Research”, 16 (1), pp. 1- 38.
Google Scholar

Chen Y.M., Chiu Y.-P. (2014), Business Intelligence and Analytics to Prediction of Going Concern using NeuroFuzzy Approach. Asian Conference on Technology, Information & Society Proceedings.
Google Scholar

Comi M. (2018), Is Artificial Intelligence Racist? (And Other Concerns). Towards Data Science, 11 Nov 2018. – URL: https://towardsdatascience.com/is-artificial-intelligence-racist-and-other-concerns-817fa60d75e9 (retrieved 22.11.2018).
Google Scholar

Giddens A. (1990), The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Giddens A. (1991), Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar

Golohvastov D.V., Pokrovskaia N.N., Snisarenko S.O. (2016), Institutional Confidence and Economic Intelligence for the Performance at Macro and Micro Networks. 4th Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance ICMLG 2016, Reading: Academic Conferences and Publishing, pp. 255-263.
Google Scholar

Huntington S.P. (1993), The Clash of Civilizations? “Foreign Affairs”, pp. 22-49.
Google Scholar

Huntington S.P. (1996), Clash of Civilizations? The debates. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar

Huntington S.P. (1996) The Clashes of Civilisations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar

Jouret G. (2013), Mobilizing The Internet of Everything. Cisco Blogs, February 11.2013., source: https://blogs.cisco.com/wireless/mobilizing-the-internet-of-everything?dtid=osscdc000283 (retrieved 12.11.2018).
Google Scholar

Leary T. (1994), Chaos & Cyber Culture . Berkeley: Ronin Publishing, Inc.
Google Scholar

Mariański J. (2009) Nowe formy religijności i duchowości – od socjologii religii do socjologii duchowości? [in:] Z. Drozdowicz (ed.), O wielowymiarowości badań religioznawczych. Poznań 2009, pp. 149-179.
Google Scholar

Mariański J. (2010), Religia w społeczeństwie ponowoczesnym. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Google Scholar

Mariański J., Wargacki S. (2012), New Spirituality as a new social and cultural mega- tendency. Anglojęzyczny Suplement – “Przegląd Religioznawczy”, p. 26.
Google Scholar

Motak D. (2012), Georg Simmel`s Concept of Religion and Religiosity. “Studia Religiologica”, 45 (2): 109-115.
Google Scholar

Pokrovskaia N.N. (2012), Global and Local Regulating Approach for Sustainable Development. Sustainable Manufacturing – Shaping Global Value Creation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 287-292.
Google Scholar

Pokrovskaia N.N. (2014), Leisure and entertainment as a creative space-time manifold in a post-modern world. [in:] R. Ozturk (ed.), Handbook of Research on the Impact of Culture and Society on the Entertainment Industry. Hershey, pp. 21-38.
Google Scholar

Pokrovskaia N.N. (2016), Neuro-communication and reverse rule of payment in the digital economy: the monetary evaluation of experience. 2nd Conference Technological perspective within the Eurasian space, new markets and economic growth points. St- Petersburg: Asterion, pp. 271-275.
Google Scholar

Aupers S. (2010), (ed.), Religions of Modernity Relocating the Sacred to the Self and the Digital. Leiden: Brill.
Google Scholar

Rinallo D., Scott L., Maclaran P. (2013), (eds.), Spirituality and Consumption. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar

Sigov V.I., Uvarov S.A., Pokrovskaia N.N. (2017), Neuro-fuzzy tools in studying social management. Proceedings of 2017 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Control in Technical Systems, CTS 2017. IEEE Explore, pp. 216-219.
Google Scholar

Toffler A. (1990), Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century. New York: Bantam.
Google Scholar

Ülgen F. (2013), Coordination in Economy: An Essay on Money. [in:] F. Ülgen (ed.), New Contributions to Monetary Analysis: The Foundations of an Alternative Economic Paradigm. London: Routledge, pp. 172-187.
Google Scholar

Ülgen F. (2014), Schumpeterian Economic Development and Financial Innovations: A Conflicting Evolution. “Journal of Institutional Economics”, vol. 10, is. 2: 257-277.
Google Scholar

Ülgen F. (2017), Financialization and Vested Interests: Self-Regulation vs. Financial Stability as a Public Good. “Journal of Economic Issues”, 51 (2): 332-340.
Google Scholar

Van der Meulen R. (2013), Gartner says personal worlds and the internet of everything are colliding to create new markets. Gartner, 11.11.2013, source: https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2621015 (retrieved 22.11.2018).
Google Scholar

Varga I. (2007), Georg Simmel: Religion and Spirituality. [in:] K. Flanagan, P.C. Jupp (eds.), A Sociology of Spirituality. London: Routledge, pp. 145-160.
Google Scholar

Wargacki S.A. (2008), Ruch New Age a innowacje religijne i społeczno-kulturowe. [in:] I. Borowik, J. Doktór, M. Libiszowska-Żółtkowska (eds.), Oblicza religii i religijności. Kraków: Zakład Wydawniczy Nomos, pp. 290-304.
Google Scholar

Wargacki S.A. (2000), New Age. [in:] H. Zimoń (ed.), Religia w świecie współczesnym. Zarys problematyki religiologicznej, Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL, pp. 451-486.
Google Scholar

Weber M. (1946), Science as Vocation. From Max Weber. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Zandbergen D. (2012), Fulfilling the Sacred Potential of Technology: New Edge Technophilia, Consumerism, and Spirituality in Silicon Valley. Things: Religion and the Question of Materiality.
Google Scholar

Nadezhda Nikolaevna Pokrovskaia

wydawnictwo@uksw.edu.pl

Afiliacja:

Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg State Electrotechnical University LETI Federacja Rosyjska

Albina Ahmetovna Beschasnaya

Afiliacja:

Emperor Alexander I St. Petersburg State Transport University, North-West Institute of Management of the Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration Federacja Rosyjska

Stanislav Vladimirovich Boiko

Afiliacja:

Cherepovets University of Radio Electronics Federacja Rosyjska