The The Great Fire of London as a Memory Site (Lieu de Mémoire)

Anna Maria Tomczak

doi:10.21697/zk.2019.6.01

Pubblicato il: 2019-12-31

N. 6 (2019)

The The Great Fire of London as a Memory Site (Lieu de Mémoire)

Anna Maria Tomczak

Załącznik Kulturoznawczy

Sezione: Artykuły

https://doi.org/10.21697/zk.2019.6.01

Abstract

The author approaches the Great Fire of London of 1666 as a memory site, using Pierre Nora’s concept to analyse various forms and acts of remembrance of this historic event. Special attention is paid to John Dryden’s poem Annus Mirabilis, fragments of Samuel Pepys’s Diary, the architectural Monument of the Great Fire in the City of London, and the celebrations of the 350th anniversary with its spectacular London’s Burning festival. Nora’s idea of lieu de mémoire, when used as a conceptual tool, makes it possible to link collective memory and identity, not through a linear historic narration of a society’s past but through specific individual events and their symbolic impact. As a social construct, collective memory is an important constitutive element of national identity. The memory of the Great Fire – in its material, symbolic and functional aspects – fosters cultural identity of the British and the feeling of belonging.

Scarica file

PDF (English)

Regole di citazione

Tomczak, A. M. (2019). The The Great Fire of London as a Memory Site (Lieu de Mémoire). Załącznik Kulturoznawczy, (6), 11–40. https://doi.org/10.21697/zk.2019.6.01

##plugins.themes.libcom.share##

Licenza

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Peter Ackroyd, Londyn: biografia, transl. T. Bieroń, Zysk i S-ka, Poznań 2011.
Google Scholar

Mark Brown, Museum of London to mark the Great Fire of London, „Guardian”, 2nd Sept. 2015, https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2015/sep/02/museum-of-london-to-mark-great-fire-of-london.
Google Scholar

Paul Connerton, How Societies Remember, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1989.
Google Scholar

David Daiches, A Critical History of English Literature (2nd edition), Vol. 3: The Restoration to 1800, Secker & Warburg, London 1968.
Google Scholar

John Dryden, Annus Mirabilis, in The Poems of John Dryden, London 1914, https://www.bartleby.com/204/5.html.
Google Scholar

George Ferguson, Signs and Symbols in Christian Art, Oxford University Press, London – New York 1961.
Google Scholar

Jacob F. Field, London, Londoners and the Great Fire of 1666: Disaster and Recovery, Routledge, London 2017.
Google Scholar

Philip Glanville, The City of London, [in:] The Cambridge Cultural History of Britain, Vol. 4: Seventeenth-Century Britain, ed. B. Ford, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1992.
Google Scholar

Christoph Heyl, A Miserable Sight. The Great Fire of London (1666), [in:] Fiasko – Scheitern in der Frühen Neuzeit: Beitraege zur Kulturgeschichte des Misserfolgs, eds. S. Brakensiek, C. Claridge, Transcript, Bielefeld 2015.
Google Scholar

Edward N. Hooker, The purpose of Dryden’s Annus Mirabilis, „Huntington Library Quarterly” 1946, Vol. 10, No 1.
Google Scholar

Andreas Huyssen, Present Pasts: Media, Politics, Amnesia, „Public Culture” 2000, Vol. 12, No. 1.
Google Scholar

Andreas Huyssen, Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory, Stanford University Press, Stanford 2003.
Google Scholar

David Lowenthal, The Past is a Foreign Country, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2003.
Google Scholar

Charlotte Lytton, Tom Ough, London’s Burning. Again, „The Telegraph”, 2nd Sept. 2016, telegraph.co.uk/graphics/projects/london-great-fire-burning-art/index.html.
Google Scholar

Jon McKenzie, Perform or Else: From Discipline to Performance, Routledge, London – New York 2001.
Google Scholar

Robert S. Nelson, Margaret Olin, Introduction, [in:] Monuments and Memory, Made and Unmade, eds. R. S. Nelson and M. Olin, University of Chicago Press, Chicago – London 2003.
Google Scholar

Pierre Nora, Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire, transl. M. Roudebush, „Representations” 1989, No. 26, Special Issue: Memory and Counter-Memory.
Google Scholar

Jeremy Paxman, The English. A Portrait of a People, Penguin Group, London 1999.
Google Scholar

Samuel Pepys, Diary, https://www.pepysdiary.com/diary/.
Google Scholar

Edward Rutherfurd, London, Arrow Books, New York 1998.
Google Scholar

Thereon Schmidt, Unsettling Representation: Monuments, Theatre and Relational Space, „Contemporary Theatre Review” 2010, Vol. 20, No. 3.
Google Scholar

Bill Schwarz, Memory, Temporality, Modernity. Les Lieux de memoire, [in:] Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates, eds. S. Radstone and B. Schwarz, Fordham University, New York 2010.
Google Scholar

Peter Sherlock, The Reformation of Memory in Early Modern Europe, [in:] Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates, eds. S. Radstone and B. Schwarz, Fordham University, New York 2010.
Google Scholar

Andrzej Szpociński, Sites and Non-Sites of Memory, transl. A. Warso, „Teksty Drugie” 2016, Vol. 1, Special Issue – English Edition.
Google Scholar

Diana Taylor, The Archive and the Repertoire. Performing Cultural Memory in Americas, Duke University Press, Durham – London 2007.
Google Scholar

Adrian Tinniswood, By Permission of Heaven: the Story of the Great Fire of London,
Google Scholar

Riverhead Books, London 2004.
Google Scholar

Anna Maria Tomczak, Cultural Memory and Food: South Asian Diasporic Fiction, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku, Białystok 2012.
Google Scholar

Anne Whitehead, Memory, Routledge, London – New York 2009.
Google Scholar

Jay Winter, The Memory Boom in Contemporary Historical Studies, „Raritan” 2001, Vol. 21, No. 1.
Google Scholar

Jay Winter, Sites of Memory, [in:] Memory: Histories, Theories, Debates, eds. S. Radstone and B. Schwarz, Fordham University, New York 2010.
Google Scholar