Abrahamsen, A.A. (1987). Bridging boundaries versus breaking boundaries: Psycholinguistics in perspective. Synthese, 3(72), 355-388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413752
Google Scholar

Ballantyne, N. (2019). Epistemic trespassing. Mind, 128(510). DOI10.1093/mind/fzx042. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx042
Google Scholar

Barsalou, L.W. (2010). Introduction to 30th anniversary perspectives on cognitive science: Past, present, and future. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 322-327. DOI10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01104.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01104.x
Google Scholar

Bermúdez, J.L. (2014). Cognitive science: An introduction to the science of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107279889
Google Scholar

Boden, M.A. (1999). What is interdisciplinarity?. In: R. Cunningham (ed.), Interdisciplinarity and the organization of knowledge in Europe, 13-24. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Google Scholar

Boon, M. (2020). The role of disciplinary perspectives in an epistemology of scientific models. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(10), 1-34. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00295-9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00295-9
Google Scholar

Cohen-Cole, J. (2007). Instituting the science of mind: intellectual economies and disciplinary exchange at Harvard’s Center for Cognitive Studies. The British Journal for the History of Science, 4(40), 567-597. (https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087407000283). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087407000283
Google Scholar

Freeth, R., Caniglia, G. (2020). Learning to collaborate while collaborating: advancing interdisciplinary sustainability research. Sustainability Science, 1(15), 247-261. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00701-z). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00701-z
Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1985). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Gentner, D. (2010). Psychology in cognitive science: 1978-2038. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(3), 328-344. (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01103.x). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01103.x
Google Scholar

Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2016). Interdisciplinary success without integration. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(6), 343-360. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-016-0139-z). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-016-0139-z
Google Scholar

Keyser, S.J., Miller, G.A., Walker, E. (1978). Cognitive science, 1978: Report of the state of the art committee to the advisors of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. Retrieved from http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/misc/Cognitive-Science1978_OCR.pdf.
Google Scholar

Mäki, U. (2016). Philosophy of interdisciplinarity. What? Why? How?. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(6), 327-342. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-016-0162-0). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-016-0162-0
Google Scholar

Mäki, U., Walsh, A., Pinto, M.F. (eds.). (2017). Scientific imperialism: Exploring the boundaries of interdisciplinarity. London – New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315163673
Google Scholar

Miller, G.A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(7), 141-144. (https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9
Google Scholar

Nowakowski, P.R. (2019). Epistemic Challenges: Engaging Philosophically in Cognitive Science. Ruch Filozoficzny, 2(75), 237-255. (https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2019.032). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12775/RF.2019.032
Google Scholar

Núñez, R., Allen, M., Gao, R., Miller Rigoli, C., Relaford-Doyle, J., Semenuks, A. (2019). What happened to cognitive science?. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(8), 782-791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0626-2
Google Scholar

Porcelli, A.M., Teller, A.S. (2019). Asymmetric Epistemology: Field Notes from Training in Two Disciplines. Perspectives on Science, 2(27), 187-213. (https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00305). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00305
Google Scholar

Schmidt, J.C. (2011). What is a problem? On problem-oriented interdisciplinarity. Poiesis and Praxis, 4(7), 249-274. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0091-0). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-011-0091-0
Google Scholar

Thompson Klein, J. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In: R. Frodeman, J. Thompson Klein, and C. Mitcham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, 15-30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar

Van den Besselaar, P., Heimeriks, G. (2001). Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary: Concepts and indicators. In: Paper for the 8th conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics – ISSI2001, Sydney. Australia, July 16-20, 2001, 705-716.
Google Scholar