KONTYNUACJA SPORU O METODĘ W FILOZOFII REALISTYCZNEJ  I REALIZMIE KRYTYCZNYM

Marcin Zarzecki

Published: 2018-11-26

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2015)

Continuation of the dispute over the method of realistic philosophyand critical realism

Marcin Zarzecki

Abstract

Realistic philosophy by questioning realistic idealism, rationalism, constructivism or solipsistic relativism makes an autonomy of the world with respect to its social constructs fundamental issue. Therefore Margaret Archer interprets the weberian concept of historical religious systems impact on the constitution of capitalism as an example morphogenetic cycle. She consequently eliminates the methodological individualism and methodological collectivism of social sciences, and unequivocally rejects weberian constructivist inclusions.Margaret Archer’s metatheory is part of a classic dispute over the methods of knowledge in the social sciences (Methodenstreit) and to a large extent is a contemporary variation, or a development of fundamental conflict in the understanding of relation of social sciences (or humanistic "sciences of the spirit" -Geisteswissenschaften), to natural sciences ( Naturwissenschaften).Referringto the dilemmas of her predecessors, Margaret Archer affirms elements of their theories leading to the opinion of irreducibility of perceived world. At the same time she accepts the neo-Kantian, phenomenological, hermeneutic, etnometodological and interpretive doubt with respect to the objectivity of the cognitive tools enabling to catch aspects of reality. In the morphogenetic approach of Margaret Archer popperian perspective is revealed which emphasizes analytical function of the cultural level in causal perceiving. Archer transforms the popperian conception in the spirit of Marxist functionalist approach of David Lockwood seeking to integrate social systems with the idea of social conflict.

Keywords:

methodology, morphogenesis, Margaret Archer, John Searle

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Zarzecki, M. (2018). Continuation of the dispute over the method of realistic philosophyand critical realism. Academic Journal of Sociology, 10(1). Retrieved from https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/ucs/article/view/2913

Cited by / Share

References

Amsterdamski, S., (1983), Między historią a metodą, Warszawa: PIW.
Google Scholar

Andreski, S. L., (1992), Maxa Webera olśnienia i pomyłki, Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Archer, M. S., (1979), Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage.
Google Scholar

Archer, M. S., (2007), Making our Way through the World: Human Reflexivity and Social Mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar

Gadamer, H. G., (1993), Prawda i metoda. Zarys hermeneutyki filozoficznej, Kraków: Inter Esse.
Google Scholar

Garfinkel, H., (2007), Studia z etnometodologii, Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Giddens, A., (2009), Nowe zasady metody socjologicznej, Kraków: NOMOS.
Google Scholar

Goffman, E., (1978), The Presentation of Self to Others, [in.] J. G. Manis, B. Meltzer (eds.), Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology, Allyn and Bacon: Boston, London, Sydney, Toronto, s. 171–177.
Google Scholar

Gouldner, A. W., (1984), Anty-Minotaur, czyli mit socjologii wolnej od wartości, [w:] E. Mokrzycki (red.), Kryzys i schizma. Antyscjentyczne tendencje w socjologii współczesnej, t. I, Warszawa: PIW, s. 13–43.
Google Scholar

Gurwitsch, A., (1962), The Common-Sense World as Social Reality, „Social Research”, no. 29, s. 50– 53.
Google Scholar

Hałas, E., (2001), Symbole w interakcji, Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Google Scholar

Hałas, E., (2006), Interakcjonizm symboliczny. Społeczny kontekst znaczeń, Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Hałas, E., (2007), Symbole i społeczeństwo. Szkice z socjologii interpretacyjnej, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UW.
Google Scholar

Handel, W., (1979), Normative Expectations and the Emergence of Meaning as Solutions to Problems: Convergence of Structural and Interactionis Views, “American Journal of Sociology”, no. 8, s. 855–881.
Google Scholar

Hempel, C. G., (2001), Filozofia nauk przyrodniczych, Warszawa: Aletheia.
Google Scholar

Hodges, H. A., (1952), The Philosophy of Wilhelm Dilthey, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
Google Scholar

Hughes, H. S., (1958), Consciousness and Society, New York: Vintage Books.
Google Scholar

Kemeny, J. G., (1967), Nauka w oczach filozofa, Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Kmita, J., Nowak, L., (1968), Studia nad teoretycznymi podstawami humanistyki, Poznań: Wydawnictwo UAM.
Google Scholar

Krasnodębski, Z., (1999), M. Weber, Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Google Scholar

Krawczak, E., (2003), Antropologia kulturowa, Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.
Google Scholar

Kuderowicz, Z., (1967), Dilthey, Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Google Scholar

Levitt, C., (1972), The Sociology of Knowledge and its Influence on George Lukacs, Anthropology Department University Press: University of Waterloo.
Google Scholar

Marshall G., (red.), (2005), Słownik socjologii i nauk społecznych, Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Meltzer, B. N., Petras, J. W. , Reynolds, L. T., (1978), Varieties of Symbolic Interactionism, [in.] J. G. Manis, B. Meltzer (eds.), Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology, Allyn and Bacon: Boston, London, Sydney, Toronto, s. 41–57.
Google Scholar

Parsons, T., (1949), The Structure of Social Action, New York: The Free Press at Glencoe.
Google Scholar

Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., Jefferson, G., (1974), A Simplest Systematics for the Analysis of Tutn-Taking in Conversation, “Language”, no. 50, s. 696–735.
Google Scholar

Schutz, A., (1967), The Phenomenology of the Social World, Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar

Searle, J. (1995), The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar

Sojak, R., (2004), Paradoks antropologiczny. Socjologia wiedzy jako perspektywa ogólnej teorii społeczeństwa, Wrocław: Wydawnictwo UWr.
Google Scholar

Szacki, J., (2002), Historia myśli socjologicznej, Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Tsekeris, Ch., Lydaki A., (2011), The Micro-Macro Dilemma in Sociology: perplexities and perspectives, „SOCIOLOGIJA”, Vol. LIII, No. 1, s. 67–82.
Google Scholar

Turner, J. H., (2004), Struktura teorii socjologicznej, Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Wilson, T. P., (1970), Conceptions of Interaction and Forms of Sociological Explanation, “American Sociological Review”, no. 4, s. 697–710.
Google Scholar

Wrong, D., (1961), The Oversocialized Conception of Man in Modern Sociology, “American Sociological Review”, no. 2, s. 183–193.
Google Scholar

Zeuner, L., (1999), Margaret Archer on Structural and Cultural Morphogenesis, „Acta Sociologica”, Vol. 42, s. 79–86.
Google Scholar