Mechanizm i obszary wsparcia rozwoju współpracy transgranicznej oraz ochrony dziedzictwa i krajobrazu kulturowego w ramach programu „Interreg Polska – Słowacja” : Mechanism and Areas of Support for the Development of Cross-Border Cooperation and the Protection of Heritage and Cultural Landscape Under the Interreg Poland – Slovakia Program

Jan Pochwała

doi:10.21852/sem.2020.3.06

Published: 2022-09-21

Vol. 41 No. 3 (2020)

Mechanizm i obszary wsparcia rozwoju współpracy transgranicznej oraz ochrony dziedzictwa i krajobrazu kulturowego w ramach programu „Interreg Polska – Słowacja”

Mechanism and Areas of Support for the Development of Cross-Border Cooperation and the Protection of Heritage and Cultural Landscape Under the Interreg Poland – Slovakia Program

Jan Pochwała

Seminare. Learned Investigations

Section: Socio-pedagogical sciences

https://doi.org/10.21852/sem.2020.3.06

Abstract

In order to support the development of Polish and Slovak border regions, after the accession of both countries to the EU, the “Interreg Poland – Slovakia” Program was implemented. One of the priorities of the Program is the protection and use of the common Polish-Slovak cultural and natural heritage for the development of cross-border cooperation. As part of Interreg since 2004, EU-Structural Funds have co-financed joint Polish-Slovak projects implemented in selected counties/poviat located in the following voivodeships/provinces: Śląskie, Małopolskie, Podkarpackie (on the Polish side) and Žilinskom kraji, Prešovskom kraji and Košickým kraji (on the Slovak side). The next editions of Interreg are becoming increasingly popular in Poland and Slovakia including its recognition by experts as well as the implementation of a cross-border effect.

Keywords:

European Union, cohesion policy, cross-border cooperation, Interreg Polska-Slovakia, cultural heritage, natural heritage

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Pochwała , J. (2022). Mechanizm i obszary wsparcia rozwoju współpracy transgranicznej oraz ochrony dziedzictwa i krajobrazu kulturowego w ramach programu „Interreg Polska – Słowacja” : Mechanism and Areas of Support for the Development of Cross-Border Cooperation and the Protection of Heritage and Cultural Landscape Under the Interreg Poland – Slovakia Program . Seminare. Learned Investigations, 41(3), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.21852/sem.2020.3.06

Cited by / Share

References

Allen, Kawika i Paul Heppner. 2011. Religiosity, coping & psychological well-being among Latter Day Saint Polynesians in the United States. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 2, 13-24.
Google Scholar

Berry, John. 2005. Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 697-712.
Google Scholar

Cardemil, Esteban, Kim Saeromi i Tatiana Davidson. 2005. Developing a culturally appropriate depression prevention program: the family coping skills program. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority, 11, 99-112.
Google Scholar

Chol Yoo, Hyung i Richard Lee. 2005. Ethnic identity and approach-type coping as moderators of the racial discrimination/wellbeing relation in Asian Americans. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 497-506.
Google Scholar

Compas, Bruce. 1987. Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 393-403.
Google Scholar

Constantine, Madonna et al. 2005a. A qualitative investigation of the cultural adjustment experiences of Asian international college women. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority, 11, 162-175.
Google Scholar

Constantine, Madonna et al. 2005b. Coping responses of Asians, Black, Latino/Latina New York residents following the September 11th terrorists’ attacks against the United States. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority, 11, 293-308.
Google Scholar

Erard, Robert. 2009. The paradox of indiscriminate multiculturalism. American Psychologist, 64, 564-575.
Google Scholar

Folkman, Suzan i Judith Tedlie Moskowitz. 2004. Coping: pitfalls and promise. Annual Review and Psychology, 55, 745-774.
Google Scholar

Heppner, Paul et al. 2006. Development & validation of Collectivistic Coping Styles Inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 107-125.
Google Scholar

Holmes, Thomas i Richard Rahe. 1967. The Social Readjustment Rating Scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218.
Google Scholar

Lazarus, Richard i Suzan Folkman. 1984. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar

Neto, Felix. 2019. Acculturation, adaptation and saudade among Portugese migrants. Journal of Psychology, 7, 667-697.
Google Scholar

Nilsson, Jenny i Nihad Bunar. 2016. Educational responses to newly arrived students in Sweden: understanding the structure and influence of post migration ecology. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 4, 399-416.
Google Scholar

Schaffer, Rudolph. 2000. Psychologia dziecka, tłum. Aleksander Wojciechowski. Warszawa: PWN.
Google Scholar

Torres, Lucas. 2010. Predicting levels of Latino depression: acculturation, acculturative stress and coping. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority, 16, 256-263.
Google Scholar

Triandis, Harry. 1994. Culture and Social Behaviour. New York: McGraw-Hil.
Google Scholar

Mapa „Aktualne dokumenty (liczba cudzoziemców posiadających aktualnie ważne dokumenty uprawniające do pobytu w Polsce)”. 2020. Dostęp: 4.04.2020. https://migracje.gov.pl/statystyki/zakres/polska/typ/dokumenty/widok/mapa/rok/2020/?x=0.6079&y=1.1422&level=1.
Google Scholar

Yeh, Christine et al. 2006. Asian American Families Collectivistic Coping. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority, 12, 134-148.
Google Scholar

Yeh, Christine i Mary M. Hwang. 2000. Interdependence in ethnic identity and self: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78, 420-429.
Google Scholar