Czy tylko apokaliptyka? ΠΑΣΧΩ i ΠΑΘΗΜΑ w kontekście Rz 8 oraz Ga 3

Dariusz Sztuk

doi:10.21852/sem.2016.1.02

Published: 2022-12-16

Vol. 37 No. 1 (2016)

Is it only Apokalyptic ΠΑΣΧΩ and ΠΑΘΗΜΑ in the Context of Romans 8 and Gal 3

Dariusz Sztuk

Seminare. Learned Investigations

Section: Theology

https://doi.org/10.21852/sem.2016.1.02

Abstract

In the long history of interpreting Pauline epistolarium and, in particular, the Letters to the Galatians and Romans, some authors have discovered that both texts contain apocalyptic motives, or they have postulated their apocalyptic reading. As it has been contended, the main arguments in support of such an interpretation comprise, among other things, the linguistic style as well as imagery drawing on the apocalyptic writings associated with the traditions of the Old Testament. The author of the present article points to the use of terms πάσχω and πάθημα in the letters to the Galatians and Romans and puts forward a hypothesis that in the context of these texts, St. Paul used the theological topos of the Exodus and the means of expression characteristic of apocalyptic which was at the time a popular method of presenting both the meaning of past events and the imperatives arising from the truth about reconciliation with God.

Keywords:

suffering, apocalyptic, the Exodus, St. Paul, biblical theology, ethics NT, Letter to the Galatians, Letter to the Romans

Download files

PDF (Język Polski)

Citation rules

Sztuk, D. (2022). Is it only Apokalyptic ΠΑΣΧΩ and ΠΑΘΗΜΑ in the Context of Romans 8 and Gal 3 . Seminare. Learned Investigations, 37(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.21852/sem.2016.1.02

Cited by / Share

References

Achtemeier, Paul J. 1983. “An Apocalyptic Shift in Early Christian Tradition”. CBQ 45:231-248.
Google Scholar

Adinolfi, Marco. 1977. “La dialettica indicativo-imperativo nelle lettere paoline”. Antonianum 52:626-646.
Google Scholar

Aune, David E. 2010. “Apokaliptyka”. in: Słownik Teologii św. Pawła. G. F. Hawthorne – R. P. Martin – D. G. Reid (ed.). Warszawa: Vocatio. 21-30.
Google Scholar

Baumgarten, Jörg. Paulus und die Apokalyptik. Die Auslegung apokalyptischer Überlieferungen in den echten Paulusbriefen. WMANT 44. Neukirken-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag.
Google Scholar

Beker, Johann Ch. 1982. Paul's apocalyptic gospel: the coming triumph of God. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
Google Scholar

Bindemann, Walther. 1983. Die Hoffnung der Schöpfung. Römer 8,18-27 und die Frage einer Theologie der Befreiung von Mensch und Natur. Neukirchener Studien 14. Neukirken-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag.
Google Scholar

Branick, Vincent P. 1985, “Apocalyptic Paul?”. CBQ 47(4):664-675.
Google Scholar

Buscemi, Alfio M. 2004. Lettera ai Galati. Commentario esegetico. SBF Analecta 63. Jerusalem: Franciscan Printing Press.
Google Scholar

Cranfield, Charles E. B. 1975 The Epistle to the Romans. ICC. vol. I. Edinburgh: T & T Clark.
Google Scholar

De Boer, Martinus C. 1989. “Paul and Jewish Apocalyptic Eschatology”, in: J. Marcus – M. L. Soards (ed.), Apocalyptic and the New Testament. Essays in Honor of J. Louis Martyn. JSNT Suppl. 24. Sheffield: 169-190.
Google Scholar

Dunne, John A. 2013. “Suffering in Vain: A Study of the Interpretation of ΠΑΣΧΩ in Galatians 3,4”. JSNT 36(1):3-16.
Google Scholar

Dunne, John A. 2015. “Suffering and covenantal hope in Galatians: a critique of the ‘apocalyptic reading’ and its proponents”. Scottish Journal of Theology 68(1):1-15.
Google Scholar

Fretheim Terrence. 1991. “The Reclamation of Creation: Redemtion and Law in Exodus”. Interpretation 45:356.
Google Scholar

Gaventa, Beverly R.(ed.). 2013. Apocalyptic Paul: cosmos and anthropos in Romans 5-8, Waco: Baylor University Press.
Google Scholar

Hahne, Harry A. 2006. The Corruption and Redemption of Creation: Nature in Romans 8:19-22 and Jewish Apocalyptic Literature. The Library of New Testament Studies 336. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Google Scholar

Herman, Zvonomir I. 1987. “Saggio esegetico sul 'già e non ancora' soteriologico in Rm 8”. Antonianum 62:26-84.
Google Scholar

Käsemann, Ernest. 1969. On the Subject of Primitive Christian Apocalyptic, in: Idem, New Testament Questions of Today, Philadelphia: Fortress Press.
Google Scholar

Martyn, J. Louis. 1997. Galatians. The Anchor Bible. New York: Doubleday.
Google Scholar

Martyn, J. Louis. 2000. “The Apocalyptic Gospel in Galatians”. Interpretation 54(3): 246-266.
Google Scholar

Matlock, R. Barry. 1996. Unveiling the Apocalyptic Paul. Paul's Interpreters and the Rhetoric of Criticism. JSNTSuppl. 127. Sheffield: Academic Press.
Google Scholar

Mycielski, Ludwik. 1972. “Apokaliptyczna szata literacka opisów paruzji Chrystusa z listów do Tesaloniczan. Analecta Cracoviensia 4:147-179.
Google Scholar

Parchem, Marek. 2010. “Wprowadzenie”, in: Idem (ed.), Pisma apokaliptyczne i testamenty. Apokryfy Starego Testamentu 2. Kraków – Mogilany: The Enigma Press: 21-115.
Google Scholar

Penna, Romano. 2006. Lettera ai Romani. II. Rm 6 – 11. Scritti delle origini cristiane 6/2. Bologna: Dehoniane.
Google Scholar

Pikor, Wojciech. 2014. “Prorocka interpretacja exodusu. I. Amos, Ozeasz”. Biblica et Patristica Thoruniensia 7:41-53.
Google Scholar

Popowski, Roman. 1985. Imperatiwus na tle indikatiwu w listach Pawła z Tarsu. Studium językowo-egzegetyczne. Lublin: RW KUL.
Google Scholar

Rossi, Benedetto. 1992. La creazione tra il gemito e la gloria. Studio esegetico e teologico di Rm 8,18-25.Roma: Edizioni Dehoniane.
Google Scholar

Sailors, Timothy B. 2009. “Der Römerbrief und die 2. (syrische) Baruch-Apokalypse : Gemeinsamkeiten und Unterschiede“. in: U. Schnelle (ed.), The Letter to the Romans. Bibliotheca ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 226. Leuven: 563-594.
Google Scholar

Schnackenburg, Roman. 1981. Messaggio morale del Nuovo Testamento, Roma.
Google Scholar

Schweitzer, Albert. 1931. The Mysticism of Paul the Apostle, London: A. & C. Black.
Google Scholar

Scott, James M. 1992. Adoption as Sons of God: An Exegetical Investigation into the Background of UIOTHESIA in the Pauline Corpus. WUNT 2/48. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Google Scholar

Stockhausen, Carol K. 1993. 2 Cor. 3 and the Principles of Pauline Exegesis. in: C. A. Evans – J. A. Sanders (ed.), Paul and the Scriptures of Israel. JSNTSuppl. 83. Sheffield: Academic Press: 143-64.
Google Scholar

Strecker, Georg. 1987. “Indicative and Imperative according to Paul”. Australian Biblical Review 35:60-72.
Google Scholar

Wanamaker, Charles A. “Apocalyptic discourse, paraenesis and identity maintenance in 1 Thessalonians”. Neotestamentica 36:131-145.
Google Scholar